Sexually liberated or devoid of morals?dogstile said:Your options suck. I see people who sleep around as sexually liberated. If they use protection, then theres nothing wrong with it
Well that depends on personal viewpoints. I'd rather look at it from a good point of view. The people I know who sleep around don't exactly hurt anyone, as they talk about not wanting serious relationships and tend to let people know that if they fancy them.TheBelgianGuy said:Sexually liberated or devoid of morals?dogstile said:Your options suck. I see people who sleep around as sexually liberated. If they use protection, then theres nothing wrong with it
I can't help it, I'm a pessimistdogstile said:Well that depends on personal viewpoints. I'd rather look at it from a good point of view. The people I know who sleep around don't exactly hurt anyone, as they talk about not wanting serious relationships and tend to let people know that if they fancy them.TheBelgianGuy said:Sexually liberated or devoid of morals?dogstile said:Your options suck. I see people who sleep around as sexually liberated. If they use protection, then theres nothing wrong with it
Sexually liberated. Unless he was lying? Heck, I'm a self-proclaimed man-whore and I have morals. Just because you don't agree with them doesn't make me devoid of them.TheBelgianGuy said:Sexually liberated or devoid of morals?dogstile said:Your options suck. I see people who sleep around as sexually liberated. If they use protection, then theres nothing wrong with it
Oh, no, the people who sleep with people who have significant others disgust me. The people who cheat also disgust me.TheBelgianGuy said:I can't help it, I'm a pessimistdogstile said:Well that depends on personal viewpoints. I'd rather look at it from a good point of view. The people I know who sleep around don't exactly hurt anyone, as they talk about not wanting serious relationships and tend to let people know that if they fancy them.TheBelgianGuy said:Sexually liberated or devoid of morals?dogstile said:Your options suck. I see people who sleep around as sexually liberated. If they use protection, then theres nothing wrong with it
It's just weird to hear stuff about students sleeping with college professors. You know, people who are married and have kids. Freaks me out when I have class from them!
That's funny because I am a Scotsman (if that's why you brought that up then ignore that sentence).immovablemover said:No it fails 3% of the time, and your point is completely moot. If i'm in a relationship and a condom fails, or if it was a one night stand and the condom fails, or if i've been married 10 years and the condom fails...All of the social and legal responsibilities are, in each scenario, exactly the sameJonabob87 said:If contraception always worked I'd be in complete agreement. But it doesn't always work does it?immovablemover said:Would you like a tissue? Also, [Citation needed]. I know plenty of emotionally fucked up people who had two live in parents and plenty of emotionally healthy people who were raised by single parents.Jonabob87 said:Tell that to the throngs of fatherless children currently growing up emotionally imbalanced.immovablemover said:Curious how all the polling choices are negative and judgmental.
Sex isn't some magic thing which should be seen through rose tinted glasses and held up with reverence. If you want to sleep around, sleep around, its your life, your choices. As long as you're not lying to the people you sleep with, or manipulating them, then you're fine.
I personally find "No sex before marriage" far weirder and far more unhealthy than "Lots of sex please"
Disclaimer: I was a fatherless child myself, grew up emotionally imbalanced but fixed now. I'm not speaking from a lack of experience.
You seem to be mixing up sleeping around with knocking up people and running away. So you may not be speaking from a lack of experience from the latter, but what we're actually talking about is the former.
If someone is safe, courteous and responsible then by all means they can fuck away. There is simply nothing wrong with that.
Once again you're mixing up Being promiscuous to being a Humper'n'dumper who's going to disappear if they get someone pregnant and end up on the Jeremy Kyle show.
You are committing the No True Scotsman Fallacy. Look it up and Stop doing it.