Phoenixlight said:
Well if P.E.T.A. kills an animal it is to prevent it from suffering any longer.
While at the same time you have protesters standing outside animal shelters chastising the staff working at animal shelters for doing THE EXACT SAME FUCKING THING.
Seriously, how did you miss the hypocrisy of the exact same organisation which you praise so dearly? Oh I guess it's the standard human behaviour of people seeing only what they want to see.
Phoenixlight said:
On the whole though, P.E.T.A. is a very good organisation that shows people just how wrong eating meat is.
No they haven't. Stop making false claims please, it doesn't further your argument in the slightest.
All PETA has done is to demonstrate certain abuse occuring within the more shifty areas of the meat industry, something which PETA aren't alone in thinking is wrong, because most countries even have laws against cruelty towards animals, even in the meat industry.
That still doesn't mean that it's inherently "wrong" to eat meat, only that sanctimonious members of PETA BELIEVES it to be "wrong" to eat meat.
Phoenixlight said:
The majority of people who eat meat don't go out hunting themselves they just go to the supermarket and buy factory farmed meat.
So? It still doesn't prove your point that the practice of eating meat is "wrong" or that it makes you "morally superior" because you yourself refuse to.
Phoenixlight said:
I still don't agree with taking the life of a wild animal just so that you can have a snack; there are plenty of other things that you could eat instead which don't involve something dying.
Plants die all the time in order to provide for your vego-diet but for some reason you don't see fit to complain about the death of plants. What makes an animals deaths so "wrong" in comparison to the death of a plant?
Still, im not trying to prevent you from disagreeing. You're welcome to live with a belief that it's wrong to eat animals. The issue I have with you is the fact that you make claims to titles you have no evidence to actually deserve. Calling yourself "morally superior" in comparison to others being one of them. So when you make such obviously false and yet to be proven claims, you have a burden of evidence on you to prove exactly WHY it is inherently wrong to eat meat and why your stance is inherently "morally superior" in comparison to others.
Phoenixlight said:
Eating another living animal is a very primordial thing to do and in today's modern society there?s simply no need to eat meat because food is so easily accessible.
So? Fucking is also a pretty primordial thing to do, yet somehow you don't seem to take offense of that good old practice, now do you?
So if the primordial nature of any practice can't really measure how said practice is inherently wrong, what does?
Like I said, you're the one claiming a moral high ground here, hence you're the one having the burden of proof to actually show why you are rightfully entitled to calling yourself "morally superior".
Phoenixlight said:
And no my mother didn?t say anything like that.
Im not surprised. You might want to read up on the subject of "morality" before you claim to be "morally superior". Just a friendly tip.
Also, about PETA, here's a few clips of relevance (seriously, these should be mandatory in any thread dealing with any "morally superior" vegetarians):
That's PETA for ya... Still convinced of their "greatness"?