jdun said:
I'm sorry sir, you do realize that culture is a national (not necessarily specific to a country but, simply by definition, specific to a nation [look up the definition of both before you say they're the same thing]) thing that changes through contact with other cultures, but that normally does not completely assimilate into the other culture.
Korea used to be owned by Japan, did their culture change? Yes, drastically.
China currently owns (and has repeatedly owned) Tibet, did Tibetan culture change? Hell yes, their Buddhist temples kind of hierarchically collapsed when a majority of the prominent Buddhist monks were exiled by the communist anti-religion regimes of China.
America has owned Hawaii for quite a long time now... You ever see old journals written by European explorers of Hawaiian culture that include them inviting the explorers to their gigantic 5-star hotels with "authentic Hawaiian food"?
You ever see a McDonald's in a country that wasn't America? If you say no, then you've never been out of America, because that AMERICAN-based food chain is everywhere.
Jeans? No one thought Jeans were cool until American Teenagers started thinking so, then the price of Jeans SKY-ROCKETED in the Soviet Union, because the Soviets said they couldn't have any, because the Americans liked them.
Those are pretty noticeable and relatively recent culture changes that wouldn't have happened without some degree of globalization.
Also, I'd like to point out that "change" and "Replacement" are two different things.