Poll: Is food better than sex?

Recommended Videos

Baldry

New member
Feb 11, 2009
2,412
0
0
But what about food with sex? I believe that's the end of that discussion.
 

Firia

New member
Sep 17, 2007
1,945
0
0
Food is great, but it lacks the satisfaction of a passionate romp with whomever tickles your fancy.

Also, really, this poll needs a "I haven't had sex before, so I can't really say." Because really, if you haven't had sex before, you're just going off of masterbation experience. And masterbation is no sub for sex.
 

Hyzenthlay

New member
Aug 27, 2008
46
0
0
As the question asks "Which is better" and not "Which is most necessary for an individual humans survival" I guess it really depends on the quality of the food or sex. If we are talking a choice between 10/10 of either I'd definitely take the sex. I'm probably not the best person to ask though, I used to be unhealthily obsessed yet terrified of food and now I barely think about it unless I'm really hungry. Also good sex is...well, pretty damn good.
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
Well, seeing how I take mine mixed together I have no valuable thing to add to this.

Let me just say that family dinners are very awkward
 

Boba Frag

New member
Dec 11, 2009
1,288
0
0
Better than the less than fulfilling sex I've been subjected to at any rate.... Yes, it really is that sad.
 

Khomatose

New member
Jan 31, 2009
48
0
0
In my current relationship Imma go ahead and say food. I mean, it was close before, but now it's miles ahead.

Harsh? Perhaps.
 

Talendra

Hail, Ilpalazzo!
Jan 26, 2009
639
0
0
PurpleLeafRave said:
Well...you can combine food and sex. Whipped cream anyone? Banana fritter?
I really do hope you mean Banana Split, Fritter is battered and dipped in boiling oil XD.

That being said, it really depends, sex is not always better than food, and food is not always better than sex. That being said, if you take the absolute best of each, sex would win out.

Better yet, dinner and sex, win win.
 

Burningsok

New member
Jul 23, 2009
1,504
0
0
You need food to survive, you can live for a while without sex. But that's just on the basis of importance.
 

Folio

New member
Jun 11, 2010
851
0
0
Well, food is more useful. It's easier to get. It's a primary survival need.

So sex comes second if you want to keep your sanity together with a full tummy.
 

Leftnt Sharpe

Nick Furry
Apr 2, 2009
560
0
0
Khomatose said:
In my current relationship Imma go ahead and say food. I mean, it was close before, but now it's miles ahead.

Harsh? Perhaps.
Sooooooo what your saying is that your partner is a good cook?
 

Captain Booyah

New member
Apr 19, 2010
318
0
0
Admittedly I'm a virgin so I'm slightly biased here, but I think I'd go for food anyways. I'd sooner live my life without any physical affection but eat the most fantastic food in the world, rather than have all the sex I want but have to live off bread and water for the rest of my days. :p That's just depressing.