Poll: Is food better than sex?

[hurfdurp]

I crave food more frequently, it must be better.

 

[_Cake_]

Sex with who/where/when/why or what kinda food... well guess I haven't ever had food that makes my eyes roll back in my head or causes me to make such ungodly sounds, so smexy time it is!

 

[Harrowdown]

Well i've never had sex, but I have had steak. I'll have to say for food for now.

 

[crotalidian]

Sex for me will always be better. It usually happens less than eating so there is more anticipation for it. I will say that I have had good sex and bad sex, and food is probably better than bad sex but NOTHING is better than good sex with someone you love (or at least respect!)

but c'mon people why stint yourselves Food and Sex combined! Oysters before then chocolate sauce and champagne (possibly also strawberries and cream) during! get those imaginations in gear!

 

[Skarvig]

I can live without sex but not without food, so yeah, food is better than sex.

 

[Firia]

Bad sex is still good sex, but bad food is not good food.

Uh, no. I would take a bland dish of whatever was on the menu over bad sex. You clearly haven't been in a situation where you were thinking to yourself, "this needs to be over with... now." Bad sex is bad.

 

[Kenjitsuka]

Sex is better, unless you spice all your food with crack!

 

[Kron_the_mad wants to be deleted]

the trick is finding fun ways to combine the 2

 

[Exocet]

Both is better than just a single one.
Ladies and gentlemen,whipped cream reunites both of these worlds and makes the result even more incredibly awesome.Scientific studies(source not included) shows it boosts awesomeness by a whopping 142%

I rest my case.

 

[mongolloid]

Well it depends on the quality of the food and the sex

But I'm gonna go with food because it's a rarer occurrence than sex for me

 

[Metal Brother]

It all depends on the food, and on the sex. But typically sex is better than food.

 

[Marmooset]

It's a sliding scale. Good food is better than bad sex, and vice-versa.
And for those who've talked of the two in combination: this ain't Nine and a Half Weeks. That's basically sex with the aid of condiments. As far as food and sex goes, you're either pulling our leg, or - if you actually cannot put down the bucket of chicken long enough for a therapeutic hop in the sack - you've picked food by default.
Oh, and your partner must really love you for your mind.

 

[Sebenko]

Well, I'm content with either sort of pork.

But getting some action is probably better. I don't get much sex, though.

 

[Kevlar Eater]

I've been living my whole life without sex (and it will stay that way until I pay for it). I literally couldn't live without food (even bad food can be made decent if you don't chew too much and/or like to try new things).

 

[Soxafloppin]

No it is not,

however, i'd much rather go without sex, than without food.

 

[Natdaprat]

Having sex and trying to eat a sandwich at the same time. /thread

 

[Rusty pumpkin]

i kinda think you should've phrased this better, every answer so far is either food is needed to live, or something about whip cream. maybe "is ice cream better than..." or something similar.

 

[Super Toast]

No.

Hell, in my opinion, food isn't even better than sex with yourself. Food is severely overrated, I think.

Excluding late night apple pie, of course.

 

[Cheesus333]

I couldn't say. Never slept with a cheesecake.

But you've eaten a woman, right?

As for the topic, food is a lot more readily available, so it has that going for it...