Or at least have never had a good blowjob, which is better than any food.silasbufu said:Yeah I bet most of those who voted "yes" are virgins.
Literally speaking, there's three different kinds of sex, and that's before you start throwing positions and fetishes in there. I would bet there's more nerve endings in your cock or clit, as the case may be, than in your tongue, if you want to get into hedonistic equations.Quaxar said:Food! Not because it's necessary to survive but because I actually prefer it (and I'm not overweight, more too slim if anything).
There is only one kind of sex, but millions of tastes.
Look at it this way: The average person is put into a room and given two buttons to push, one which delivers a random restaurant-quality meal and one which delivers an orgasm. Which do you think they'll hit more? The food button would get pushed 3-4 times a day, while the orgasm button would get pushed every minute. It's because orgasms are a known quantity which always feel good. Food's drawback is in its diversity. If you were to ask, as so many women have, is chocolate better than sex, then it would be a much tighter margin.
As for diseases got from either, food poisoning can kill you. The worse STDs, AIDS and syphilis, take years to do that.
When asked whether he would rather forgo food or sex for the rest of his life, some famous French guy, whose name I cannot recall, said "I would forgo food, and live off the bodily secretions of my lovers."
Gross, French, and awesome, all at the same time.