well we all know that SOMEONE out there wants toBadong said:It depends on the occasion really. I won't have sex if I'm really hungry, and I wouldn't go to Burger King if I was horny (unless of course if I want to bugger a greasy sandwich) .
Well I certainly don't. I'd lose my six-pack. Maybe a three-course meal of meat and fruit...Dyp100 said:Sorry, my joke-detection-meter is a little off when I'm hungry.Reenix said:True, but I think you missed the joke that 100.1% of people suggests that some like their food a little TOO much...and thus count for .1 of an another person.Dyp100 said:Why do you say that? Some people like sex, we're designed to.Reenix said:Hmm, 100.1% people have voted. Which is surprising since only 33.8% voted for food - although I suspect most people voted 'sex' for their self-confidence issues.
OP is asking what is better, not what is more essential.
But you're right in that some people (myself included) would rather have a 3-course shag than a 3-course meal![]()
Pfff, who has 3 course meals? Too much food.
I only actually managed to watch Cal Wilson and Fiona O'Loughlin's arguments in between watching Good Game and Sanctuary, but I'd have to have gone with Cal Wilson as having the better argument of the two. O'Loughlin spent a lot of time just talking about food making you fat and then moving into menopause and then some random angel guy came down and started yabbering about god designing the first people, which I didn't catch much of, because it seemed miles away from anything approaching a point and I zoned out towards the beginning. Half the time she seems to be making the other team's point for them.Zeeky_Santos said:I was sourly disappointed by tonight's (well, okay, now last night's) debate ending. The Affirmative had a much better argument, well thought out and funny, the Negative did jack shit to persuade their point and some how they won. The British guy didn't talk about anything relevant, just how he was sick of American porn (and enjoys pelvic thrusts of TV too) and the American guy loved food to the point of insanity and then tried to prove his point with a 2% demographic. For Shame.Andronicus said:There's a sort of annual tradition in Australia where a couple of comedians get together and debate a particular topic in front of a live audience. I don't know if there's anything comparable in other countries, but it's great fun down here and they're about halfway through this year's, the topic being whether or not food is better than sex. I can't watch it all right now, as Sanctuary is about to start on another channel and damned if I'm going to miss that, so I'll finish watching the debate later on the recorder
Anyways, I thought I might ask the Escapist's opinion on the matter: what really is better? Food or sex?
Too minor notes:
1) Search bar approved
2) Let's try and keep it, err, relatively clean. I do hope the topic itself won't get me a probation. My logic is that if it's good enough for Monday night Aussie telly, it's probably good enough for the internet.
Agreed.Jack_Uzi said:Could be both, depends on what's on the menu, really.
In the States there was a show hosted by lewis black called the root of all evil. there would be two topics and comedienne would argue as if it was a trial and see what is the root of all evil. such as Donald trump or viagra.Andronicus said:There's a sort of annual tradition in Australia where a couple of comedians get together and debate a particular topic in front of a live audience.
Being 18 and a virgin doesn't make one pathetic. I, personally, am saving myself for marriage (both willingly and unwillingly.) and find it to be an admirable trait.Harkonnen64 said:My pathetic ass is 18 and still a virgin. Don't know how good sex is, but it'll have to be pretty fucking great to beat a grilled ham-and-cheese with a side of Cool Ranch Doritos...
LOLPurpleSky said:I only experienced one of these. I am really curious how food tastes . HEOOOOOOOO
![]()
I only tried food :'(