What you said was sexist I'm afraid "not letting a bunch of girls pay" gives the feeling that the girls are some what inferior to you as it sounds as if you dont want them to buy the tickets purely based on their gender. As for being chivalrous? nope the idea is there but the wording is all wrong.TeragRunner said:"I'm not letting a bunch of girls pay my admit ion." That was a mistake. Now I have three angry girls riding my ass about how sexist I am.
I tried to inform them that I was only trying to be polite,
a "normal" person.............hehcomet5002 said:What you intended wasn't. What you said was.
Although I guess it depends on who you're talking to. A feminist would say that it was 100% sexist and that you shouldn't base who you let pay something for you on gender alone.
A normal person would say that you were being chivalrous, but the way you handled it was poor (which was basically what I said).
A chauvinist would have said you weren't being sexist at all.
So, it all depends on your point of view, really. But I'm just rambling.
Sure it wasn't sexist (best when it comes intentions and all), however: you could've phrased yourself differently. Say: "Don't worry about that, I'll pay for my ticket." etc.TeragRunner said:"I'm not letting a bunch of girls pay my admit ion."
This. The wording was sexist because it implied that it is somehow degrading for a man to have something paid for buy a woman.Milkatron said:The statement kind of was, but sexism to me is more intent than content, so if you didn't really mean it to be sexist, then I can't really say it was with full conviction.