No such thing as a good sexist, ha, you are validating my point of PC activistsMaze1125 said:That doesn't mean anything unless you are already segregating men and women.Random Fella said:But do you really think it's wrong to expect my fellow men to respect women, and treat them like ladies
There is no inherent way that a "lady" is "meant" to be treated. A women is just another person, treat them as a human being, not as an arbitrarily defined "lady".
There's no such thing. Perpetuating stereotypes is never good in the end, and there's not a finite supply of politeness. If you're going to be nice to women, why not be nice to men too?but i'd say I'm a sexist in a good way,
Yes you can. It's not going to happen overnight, but it's hardly immutable.I just can't help but feel that way
If, on the other hand, you insist that "I can't change" that's certainly the first step to a self fulfilling prophecy.
Your attempt at twisting words is amusing to me, However. My stance is this if you did not grasp this the first time my good sir.Mortai Gravesend said:Brilliant. You make it clear that opening doors is about satisfying yourself and you display violent tendencies with a sexist flair to them.Kouen said:That is when I would have slapped her and told her to get off her high horse, but that's just meA Raging Emo said:Nope, but I treat everyone in a gentlemanly fashion, not just women.
This has backfired in occasion, though. I was walking into a shop near where I live, and there was a woman behind me with two children. I held the door open for her, just as I would have for anyone, and she then had a huge go at me for being sexist towards her, and that she can do it herself. She claimed that she manages to raise those two by herself, she doesn't need a man to do anything for her; she is completely independent!
I was fourteen years old at the time.
But however don't get me wrong if it was a dude it would have been a knuckle sandwich instead xD
Could you elaborate on why women shouldn't have to do these things which they are in general every bit as capable of doing as a man?Buretsu said:Yeah, see, almost nobody pulls out chairs, or opens doors for a woman because they genuinely believe a woman /can't/ do it. It's more often a case of believing a woman /shouldn't have/ to do it.Mortai Gravesend said:This may be a novel concept, but how about treating people differently is okay when there is in fact a difference that warrants it. See, women have arms so they can pull out their own chairs for instance. They do not need men to do it. Treating them differently there doesn't make sense. Same with doors. Maybe if you open for everyone, sure. But women are capable of opening their own doors, so there's no reason for a difference.MrLumber said:Here is an interesting comparison whenever I see people talking about how treating subset of humanity X, if we treated everyone equally, what would happen to the mentally disabled? If treating people differently is wrong, what happens when different people NEED to be treated differently. Basing decisions off of ones state of being is perfectly acceptable as long as you don't discriminate in a way that results in one party being lessened because of it (see segregation).
It seems like people try to equate this form of sexist behavior with misogyny, which isn't necessarily the case. Sexism isn't inherently evil. Yes, it's not ideal, but it's not always driven by malice.