I notice alot are saying MW2 will have better single player, the irony is this is COD how many of ppl who get it will play it. Personally i don't care i think both are meh.
Poll: Modern Warfare Three Is Better Than Battlefield 3
- Thread starter LebbyLegs
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Usually I would agree with the statement that they are too different to be compared, and that you should enjoy both, but I guess you can compare them when BF3 looks beautiful and ready to become the new benchmark, while MW3 looks exactly the fucking same as MW2.
BF3's Frostbite 2 trailer shows some of the best animations I've seen in a game, definately the best in any shooter, while MW3's are no different to 2.
I was excited to see the end of the totally underrated story, but I've been so put off by the insultingly little effort put into it when compared with the clearly huge amount of effort put into BF3, that I won't get it at all.
BF3's Frostbite 2 trailer shows some of the best animations I've seen in a game, definately the best in any shooter, while MW3's are no different to 2.
I was excited to see the end of the totally underrated story, but I've been so put off by the insultingly little effort put into it when compared with the clearly huge amount of effort put into BF3, that I won't get it at all.
Neither of them have been released, you fools. And they look pretty much identical. 'I couldn't pass the fitness test to join the actual armed forces' simulators.
I liked CoD, until MW2 (PC gamer here). I had hopes for BlOps, but the game crashes after 10 minutes on multiplayer, so that's a fail.
Battlefied, on the other hand, is a much better franchise for me, because it was made for the PC. Free updates, balanced multiplayer (IMO), and if the need arises, better communication.
This is my opinion and I'm not declaring that you're wrong, but the poll is in favor of CoD.
PS: 15$ for 5 maps, STEAL.
Battlefied, on the other hand, is a much better franchise for me, because it was made for the PC. Free updates, balanced multiplayer (IMO), and if the need arises, better communication.
This is my opinion and I'm not declaring that you're wrong, but the poll is in favor of CoD.
PS: 15$ for 5 maps, STEAL.
Okay, I haven't played Black Ops online since December, and this is just now becoming an issue? Because, just before I quit I had bought the FA-MAS, thought "holy crap this is a bullet hose!" and used it and the Galil (for longer range) religiously. This also came at a time when the community was collectively blowing its load over the AKS-74u and used flak jacket constantly to avoid hardline/RC car spammers, while incessantly whining about the chopper gunner and gunship streaks.Treblaine said:
Though, I have to admit I have a very hard time taking any "realistic shooter" that has shotguns that do no damage beyond fifteen or so feet seriously. At least BFBC2 got it right with slugs.
Poll sucks, topic seems trollish... Poll also seems biased. Not everyone is going to say yes or no. Somebody may be in the middle, or have an entirely different opinion.
I don't hate MW3, but I neevr played BF before so it may be better, and you sound quite like your a Call of Duty Fanboy and/or biased towards it. Or just widely in favor of it.
I'd say I'll be getting MW3, but that's because I didn't play Battlefield before and don't know whether I'll like it or not. I'll vote no since I'm undecided, and I'm not going to vote yes.
I don't hate MW3, but I neevr played BF before so it may be better, and you sound quite like your a Call of Duty Fanboy and/or biased towards it. Or just widely in favor of it.
I'd say I'll be getting MW3, but that's because I didn't play Battlefield before and don't know whether I'll like it or not. I'll vote no since I'm undecided, and I'm not going to vote yes.
I have to say no, not because of anything that MW3 will do wrong, or what I have been made to expect by it's predecessors, but I prefer the more vehicle based combat, with slightly more emphasis on teamwork (sometimes although sometimes said teamwork falls apart and then it's everyman for themselves)
I played MW3 in CoD4 and MW2. IMO, it should've ended with CoD4. New guns, attachments, and perks do not qualify as innovation, especially when the same game engine is used (TF2 just keeps adding to the game, CoD keeps adding games!). I don't need or want another CoD, especially when it includes things that should've been in the first or second.
On the other hand, BF3 looks like something refreshing to me (I like military shooters). I also like being able to destroy everything I see.
2. MWs story jumped the shark about mid-way through MW2. IDK how it will be more fulfilling when, at this point, there's no going back to plausibility. The story should have ended with CoD4.
3. You've never played a Battlefield game, have you?
4. Also, I'm guessing you're new to shooters, and these forums. We don't tend to like troll and vs threads here, or those who start them...
On the other hand, BF3 looks like something refreshing to me (I like military shooters). I also like being able to destroy everything I see.
1. Have you seen the BF3 campaign trailers?LebbyLegs said:
2. MWs story jumped the shark about mid-way through MW2. IDK how it will be more fulfilling when, at this point, there's no going back to plausibility. The story should have ended with CoD4.
3. You've never played a Battlefield game, have you?
4. Also, I'm guessing you're new to shooters, and these forums. We don't tend to like troll and vs threads here, or those who start them...
Um... The route they are taking is the one they took for 2142. Medic and Assault are the same, not medic and support. In BF2 (Im a BF2 fanboy. Never really played 2142 but a PC battlefield game is a PC battlefield game) One could argue that was essentially the case and that the OP medic class almost made assault redundant if not for the G3.VikingSteve said:
Though I do think that Medic and support lumping together was retarded too, don't you worry. I have higher hopes for BF3 though. It does sadden me that mod tools aren't looking too good though.
