Poll: Modern Warfare Three Is Better Than Battlefield 3

[Smooth Operator]

The story, seriously? People need to go read some books and see what actual stories look like :S

Anyway for me it's all about the gameplay, while MW3 will be good it is CoD4 repacked yet again, Battlefield however is stepping it up so if I get anything it will be that.

 

[MadBlueWinnie]

How about instead of making useless biased polls, you wait and then buy the game of your choosing.

Unless of course there is that nagging little doubt in the back of your mind that you will be wasting your money on your choice and no matter how hard you try to convince yourself that the sequel to the games you have played in the past won't be as fun the third time around, that little nagging feeling won't go away and so you look for other people's opinions and then thus bias your poll hoping that you will at least have some sort of group support and your ego can hold up for one more day?

Hmm?

 

[Lord Penney]

Already read MW3's story online, and it's not worth it. I'll be buying B3 this year, as well as Skyrim.

Oh, and you're poll gave me a lol, thanks!

 

[Kevlar Eater]

That's all I have to say. Of course, this is a joke.

 

[NickCooley]

I'll end up getting both, what's the point in limiting yourself to one game? The cult like following of certain brands and games as well as the vitriol that spews forth to their competitors is a constant source of confusion to me.

 

[Treblaine]

Personally I think Modern Warfare Three is going to be a much more fulfilling experience than Battlefield Three, mainly due to the story which will finally see its conclusion.
However I seem to be in the vast minority on this opinion, everyone seems to think Battlefield Three will be an epic experience of jesus proportions!
Thoughts below.

Well your attempt at a Biased poll blatantly backfired.

I think it would have been more effective to use reverse psychology.

MW3 will add another slight change to the same CoD4 formula which quite frankly everyone has played TO DEATH. They want something new, DESPERATELY. Not a few tweaks, something fundamentally different.

 

[Fenreil]

Well considering the fact that I ragequit BC2 because of the horrible user-interface (right bumper to switch weapons? What happened to Y?),

Uhhhhh, Y is switch weapons in BC2. The bumpers and throw grenades and melee. The bumpers were used to switch weapons in BC1.

Wow, that poll got curbstomped. As it is, BF3 is looking much better than MW3. It's something that comes when a developer spends time making a new engine and more than a year in development. Oh and for all the "it's gonna look like shit on consoles" people, if you watched the e3 footage, you saw console gameplay.

 

[CommanderKirov]

I like it how there are three yes options that OP thought everyone will be picking. And 93% of votes are on that one "...no" option

 

[SammiYin]

Having not played EITHER [Like 99.999% of the world] making prejudgements is stupid as hell.
But I voted no, to piss you off.

 

[surg3n]

Hehe, COD fanboys stitched up and sent to bed with that post .

Bit rough on snipers though.... I'm a sniper in BFP4F, but at least I use an SVD, so I can still mix it up in the mid range. But, at least Battlefield gives us the option, personally I'd rather play MAG, or Killzone3 than COD - because COD is only ever about close quarters and camping.
In BFP4F, 10 kills is a good score, if I get a 7:1 or 7:2 then that's my idea of a damn good game - you see people in COD with 20+ kill streaks, it's rediculous. It's that unbalanced, but the thing is that it's usually fine - because by the time their XP catches up and forces them into more challenging matches, there'll be a new COD game out, so they can go shoot some more 8 year olds in the face.

Give me BF with it's crusty old, but loyal fan base any day.

 

[GrizzlerBorno]

Hey OP, Fox News called

They want their "obvious Bias" back.

 

[Juk3n]

Right well, Thanks for bringing quickscopers into Black ops, I guess I was having too much fun without those no skill c**ts around to ruin the game.

Black Ops has a different developer from Modern Warfare.

The AK74u is NOT over powered, it is simply over used. People get the two confused when they keep getting pwned by the same weapon on multiple enemies.

Quickscoping takes skill, and it's not even a factor, have you seen the KD'S of quickscopers? Even Optic "pros" go through multiple trash gameplays before they get a Youtube worthy one. Know why? Because if you're even HALF competent at FPSs a quickscoper rushing spawn shouldn't get anywhere near you before you've mowed him down.

People don't play MW for the "realism" we play for the thrills.

And even though you're only 14 years old, you shouldnt really need this stuff explained to you.

/signed A CoD FanBoy.

if you actually understood real warfare instead of play pretending

no one plays GAMES to experience REAL warfare you numbskull, especially not CoD. And yes, i do try hard, i love trying hard, im competitive, so i try my best when on a team..this is normal for alot of gamers, im not sure why "trying hard" would be a derogatory term? kthx

Besides if you have to try in a game you're probably shit at it anyway.

Now thats just extraordinary..lol, fail less nub.

 

[Treblaine]

Hell Treyarch is putting out patches and updates on a steady stream and yet there are still Famas and ghost assholes.

Well it's no big surprise that Ghost is suddenly a "huge problem" now after they completely removed stopping power.

The ghost-equivalent had usually always been in the same perk slot as stopping-power which almost everyone preferred for how much it increased lethality.

So they removed stopping power, now the "second best" perk takes it's place.

Explosives are so nerfed that Flack-jacket is just not that useful,
Killstreaks are so lame that Hardline is barely worth it
7% faster is so insignificant Lightweight is pointless
3x spare mags means that Scavenger is less useful in Black-op than MW2

To fix Ghost you have to fix the ENTIRE PERK SLOT!

As to FAMAS, well it kills no quicker than the stopping-power weapons in MW2. It's not the FAMAS is too powerful, just all the others are too weak!

Simple solution is to give FAMAS a quicker damage drop-off and a lower-damage of 20 rather than 25. So that the "slow-n-heavy" weapons like AK and Commando have a chance outside close range.

Crazy idea for MW3: bring back stopping-power as an attachment but it cannot be used with warlord. So no silencer, no dot-sight, no grenade launcher, no rapid-fire, no nothing. It's like FMJ but in many ways the opposite, the attachment could be called "soft-point" or "Dum-dum" where echoing real life, there is no penetration and the counter: flack-jacket.

Flack jackets have no effect on pointed-solid bullets but soft-points are slowed down considerably. Flack jacket as well as reducing explosive power also counters stopping power.

Extending this, because soft-points aren't pointed, their damage drops off quicker.

 

[ToxicPiranah]

Surely your thread title should be: Modern Warfare Three will be better Than Battlefield 3? You know what with them not being out yet!!

OT: I couldn't care less about which is best as I'll probably end up playing both.

 

[Fooz]

hahah the poll results are hilarious, Battlefield will crush MW3

 

[Dragunai]

Right well, Thanks for bringing quickscopers into Black ops, I guess I was having too much fun without those no skill c**ts around to ruin the game.

Black Ops has a different developer from Modern Warfare.

The AK74u is NOT over powered, it is simply over used. People get the two confused when they keep getting pwned by the same weapon on multiple enemies.

Quickscoping takes skill, and it's not even a factor, have you seen the KD'S of quickscopers? Even Optic "pros" go through multiple trash gameplays before they get a Youtube worthy one. Know why? Because if you're even HALF competent at FPSs a quickscoper rushing spawn shouldn't get anywhere near you before you've mowed him down.

People don't play MW for the "realism" we play for the thrills.

And even though you're only 14 years old, you shouldnt really need this stuff explained to you.

/signed A CoD FanBoy.

if you actually understood real warfare instead of play pretending

no one plays GAMES to experience REAL warfare you numbskull, especially not CoD. And yes, i do try hard, i love trying hard, im competitive, so i try my best when on a team..this is normal for alot of gamers, im not sure why "trying hard" would be a derogatory term? kthx

Besides if you have to try in a game you're probably shit at it anyway.

Now thats just extraordinary..lol, fail less nub.

Gonna skip making a fool of you again and just say - Take your base Junior, take your base.

 

[Owlslayer]

So which one is better?
Hm...
Well i guess Battlefield, but that's because it has dinosaurs. I mean, come on, dinosaurs are pretty amazing.

But in all seriousnesslessness, i find the topic a bit overdone and silly. Everyone has their preferences and I'm fine with it, i find both games really fun to play for different reasons.
But damn, people here do like to insult stuff that other people like.
I wish i had a picture of a sad panda right now.

 

[Nfritzappa]

Battlefield games tend to be more satisfying than Call of Duty games. The last CoD game I enjoyed a lot was CoD4. MW3 literally looks like the same thing as MW2.