Internet Kraken said:
Onmi said:
My problem is when we have to take classes that will NOT help us in the future.
This is one of the biggest problem with the American education system. Students that can not get out of the mentality that what they are learning will not help them in the future.
Hmmhmm, yes indeed, what riffraff. *turns nose up* Why can't these hooligans just grow up and become scientist engineers who specialize in writing essays about historical figures like the rest of us, so that they can be sophisticated enough to write poetry on a day to day basis, because that's so practical. Hmmph! Next they'll be saying that it doesn't require 12 years of History classes to be a construction worker or an auto mechanic. What unreasonable rapscallions.
People like you are what make the American education system inefficient. Does the information taught to you in high school have its benefits? sure. I would even go as far as to say that at some point in your life you will almost definitely use some of it. However, the mandatory criteria is, for the most part, pointless. Why is it that I have to spend 3 months in English class every year analyzing and writing fucking poetry? Unless I want to be a poet, I could probably accomplish more by spending that time with my thumb up my ass. This applies to most of the main subjects. When it all comes down to it, a very small percentage goes on to become historians/politicians, scientists, mathematicians, or authors, and possibly other than very few isolated individuals, noone is all four. In fact I would say the only part of my high school education I will likely use are my elective classes. There is no reason why high school should take four years, and I've yet to find a situation, even in my imagination, where reading "to kill a mockingbird" or Learning about the american revolution for a third time will prove useful.
If noone questions or complains about a faulty system, nothing will change.