No, not entirely it is an amazing game but has clearly aged and has been passed by its successors Wind Waker and Twilight Princess.
it was deffinatly better on the origional console, the origional platform outclassed any emulators because it was built for thatAverageJoe said:Perhaps at it's time, I only played it a few years ago on an emulator and couldn't get into it. Maybe just not my type of game.
How did WW and TP surpass OoC? I'm truly curious to know.LeonLethality said:No, not entirely it is an amazing game but has clearly aged and has been passed by its successors Wind Waker and Twilight Princess.
Wait... What? Did you just agree with me? I'm confusedMonkeyman8 said:art assets yes (but who really cares?) Core game-play of course (it's the same engine and back then engines worked in a very different way) story, awesomeness, puzzles, far better.8-Bit_Jack said:In some ways, yes. In many ways even. But Majora's Mask is still just half of the same game housed in a different box.Monkeyman8 said:No, Majora's Mask was way better.
I can't see how that makes it any different. Not for old games, old games are better on emulators than they can be on the original platform. It played smoothly, full screen, looked prettier, (not that it really matters for such an old game) and I used my gamepad. The only thing missing is not using the weird-ass N64 controller which in my eyes is a good thing.thepj said:it was deffinatly better on the origional console, the origional platform outclassed any emulators because it was built for thatAverageJoe said:Perhaps at it's time, I only played it a few years ago on an emulator and couldn't get into it. Maybe just not my type of game.
I hear a challenge!Boneasse said:We've gotta have some people voting who's never played it!!
I DARE YOU TO COME FORWARD!
well the gameplay was decent and deffinatly not to be sniffed at, it was the traditional zelda fromat of: find-first-set-of-magufins master sword find-second-set-of-maguffins final boss fight. which whilst not really being a bad thing in itself is the archetype for all zelda games and like repeted things feels kinda grinded and a little overdone. the hyrule feild sections and all the wandering around with it's (back then) rather nice looking landscapes being played out endlessly sucked as did the way in which half the items and fairy given powers were either unuseable or redundant by the end of the game.SamuelT said:Is it really that sweet-messiah-freaking good?
well it prbably has to do with how i started gaming at an early age and by a fabulous coincidence was born the year the n64 came out, so i grew up with it and least on that controler, i guess it's like doing boring school work, i'm good with modern controllers because the weirder n64 made them seem easyAverageJoe said:I can't see how that makes it any different. Not for old games, old games are better on emulators than they can be on the original platform. It played smoothly, full screen, looked prettier, (not that it really matters for such an old game) and I used my gamepad. The only thing missing is not using the weird-ass N64 controller which in my eyes is a good thing.thepj said:it was deffinatly better on the origional console, the origional platform outclassed any emulators because it was built for thatAverageJoe said:Perhaps at it's time, I only played it a few years ago on an emulator and couldn't get into it. Maybe just not my type of game.