Poll: Paedophile sentenced to be beheaded then crucified

[Amnestic]

The crucifixion of the corpse could just be the serve as an example to others. Like shoving the heads of your fallen enemies on wooden pikes. Though I could easily be wrong. I don't know much about the Islamic faith.

Psh. They're behind the times. Back when we had people we wanted to make an example of we would hang, draw and quarter them.

Wikiquote of what that entails exactly:

1. Dragged on a hurdle (a wooden frame) to the place of execution. This is one possible meaning of drawn.
2. Hanged by the neck for a short time or until almost dead (hanged).
3. Disembowelled and emasculated and the genitalia and entrails burned before the condemned's eyes (this is another meaning of drawn?see the reference to the Oxford English Dictionary below)
4. The body divided into four parts, then beheaded (quartered).

Typically, the resulting five parts (i.e., the four quarters of the body and the head) were gibbeted (put on public display) in different parts of the city, town, or, in famous cases, in the country, to deter would-be traitors who had not seen the execution. After 1814, the convict would be hanged until dead and the mutilation would be performed post-mortem. Gibbeting was later abolished in England in 1843, while drawing and quartering was abolished in 1870.

We British knew how to punish!

 

[NIHILHATE]

Anyone who says "No, it's inhumane" is a ****. It's "inhumane" to rape kids. That is literally the worst thing someone can do, apart from torturing cats.
And no, they shouldn't crucify him, that's far too dignified. I say, cut his cock off, tattoo "nonce" on his face repeatedly, and release him into society. The people will find a fitting punishment to compliment the mutilation...

 

[chickenlord]

in my opinion i don't think the guy deserves being crucified... that's what the jew did to Jesus...that's like saying hes a like Jesus and i would have to disagree with that strongly! i say re-kill him another way after you behead him =P

 

[lSHaDoW-FoXl]

Anyone who says "No, it's inhumane" is a ****. It's "inhumane" to rape kids. That is literally the worst thing someone can do, apart from torturing cats.
And no, they shouldn't crucify him, that's far too dignified. I say, cut his cock off, tattoo "nonce" on his face repeatedly, and release him into society. The people will find a fitting punishment to compliment the mutilation...

Agreed.

 

[NoDamnNames]

Sou

Awesome. Sounds good to me.

Gets my approval as well. A shame they don't do it more often to these guys. I have better things to spend my tax money on than them rotting away in the prison system.

 

[Trivun]

I don't see how chopping off someones head and then crucifying them is humane. Though I guess that I'm biased since I'm against killing people for any reason.

A lot of people on this website have said that pedophiles should be horribly punished, so they should like this.

I think paedophiles should be horribly punished, I think they should be forcibly castrated with no anaesthetic. However, even I think this is overkill. I'm all for the death penalty for the most serious crimes (i.e. murder, and the like), and then, only in cases where there is no doubt present. For example, irrefutable DNA evidence, or similar cases.

However, for paedophilia, this is completely unjust, and the method of killing is overkill anyway. If it sets an example then I can see the reasoning, but I sure as hell can't see the general sense in this.

 

[ICantBelieveItGoesBoom]

This guy clearly has mental health issues, he should be sent to an asylum not the chopping block (or whatever they have). Then again I'm against the death penalty in all situations. Although I guess it's a good thing that they aren't crucifying him first because that's being tortured to death pretty much.

 

[danosaurus]

Child Rape is a disgusting crime but I feel that mankind should be above this kind of barbarianism by now.
I've always felt that chemical castration and a HEAVY sentence would be a more suitable punishment...

Just quietly though, if I had a child and someone raped him//her I would take the law into my own hands, Rorschach style.

 

[Vanguard_Ex]

Wait, so they're going to behead him then crucify him?

That seems a bit unnecessary. Not because it's inhumane or anything, but because he's already dead after the whole beheading.

Beat me to it. I thought the whole objective of crucifiction was a slow and painful death. If they're doing it just for show or the principle then don't crucify him, put his head on a pike. It's adding insult to death and it's an effective detterent!

 

[trelloskilos]

Just castration should be fine. Takes the cause & the instrument away, provides a suitable punishment, & sufficient humiliation & sends a message to other potential offenders. Killing him will only shorten his life, whereas a REAL & FITTING punishment would be to destroy the remainder of his life by chopping off his willy.

As he had raped 5 kids, I think it suitable to use a rusty blunt saw & no anasthetic.

 

[Nmil-ek]

Its friking Saudi Arabia we are talking about the people who stone women to death for provokative looks, commit genatalia mutilation on the streets, rape, beat, cut of hands for theft, behead in the name of a legal system. How is this any suprise we know they treat their peole like shit and have for generations, we know they do this and yet we go and carpet bomb other middle eastern countries while that bronze age hellhole continues to violate human rights hourly.

As for the guy who gives a toss would rather see him tried/injected but hes dead either way so whatever.

 

[Internet Kraken]

I don't see how chopping off someones head and then crucifying them is humane. Though I guess that I'm biased since I'm against killing people for any reason.

A lot of people on this website have said that pedophiles should be horribly punished, so they should like this.

I think paedophiles should be horribly punished, I think they should be forcibly castrated with no anaesthetic. However, even I think this is overkill. I'm all for the death penalty for the most serious crimes (i.e. murder, and the like), and then, only in cases where there is no doubt present. For example, irrefutable DNA evidence, or similar cases.

However, for paedophilia, this is completely unjust, and the method of killing is overkill anyway. If it sets an example then I can see the reasoning, but I sure as hell can't see the general sense in this.

How exactly is castrating a pedophile without anesthetic any better than beheading them? That will just lead to them having a slow, painful death as a result of infection.

Also punishing someone to set an example is not a good thing, simply because it never works. Like Amnestic said, people used to receive far more horrible punishments. But there was still crime.

 

[Doktor Merkwurdigliebe]

Why crucify? Beheading is enough.

 

[Hurr Durr Derp]

While child rape and murder certainly does deserve to be punsihed harshly, I'm personally not a huge fan of the death penalty. Especially carried out in such a barbaric way, and especially when the person being punished is mentally unstable.

I do however support forced chemical castration for sex offenders. Mentally unstable or not.

 

[Aqualung]

Odd that I should be listening to this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5Iyua1o5AU&feature=related] when I click on this topic, huh?

Anyway. Let them do their thang. The bloke asked for it.

 

[Guitarmasterx7]

Beheaded, THEN crucified? That's just ridiculous, I just can't stand for this. If he doesn't have his head he won't feel the pain of the crucifixion! I demand that they crucify him, THEN behead him right before the crucifixion kills him.