Cause its a based on a horror movie from the 80'sSwifteye said:Have you seen the ads for Piranha 3D? if you did you must have noticed that it's one of the dumbest horror films in awhile. Honestly it feels like it's an element of 80s horror shlock which it just might be. Scott pilgrim is an acquired taste. reviews aren't really faithful with being glowing or condemming. But if you look at a few you may see what that you might like it. You can always not go to the movies and wait till they show up on dvd redbox etc.Psychosocial said:Fuck Scott Pilgrim, goddamn hipster shit, and fuck Michael Cera, fuck him and everything he stands for. He's the worst actor on this planet, and I've seen alot of terrible actors. Don't believe me? See Year One, that movie makes me want to kill kittens.
Nothing can be worse than a movie that has Michael Cera in it. Nothing.
Shawn was good but i thought Hot Fuzz missed its mark by quite a bit. But thats just my feelSomeBritishDude said:It's directed by Edgar Wright, director of Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, some of the best comedies in the last 2 decades. If anyone can get an ounce of acting quality out of Michael Cera it's him.Psychosocial said:Fuck Scott Pilgrim, goddamn hipster shit, and fuck Michael Cera, fuck him and everything he stands for. He's the worst actor on this planet, and I've seen alot of terrible actors. Don't believe me? See Year One, that movie makes me want to kill kittens.
Nothing can be worse than a movie that has Michael Cera in it. Nothing.
There seems to be a great devide on the interwebs between those who adore the movie, call it a master piece and the best comic adaption ever, and those who latch on to the current hipster backlash and get into a fit. It especially irrataits me on this forum, partly because I expect better from the people here, but mostly because it's a movie devoted to retro gaming and geekdom in general. Chances are it's designed for you.
Thanks for explaining that a little deeper. While I don't feel the same way about Cera as you do, I do understand what you're getting at. It's also nice to see someone able to articulate their dislike of Cera beyond just "I HATEZ HIM!!1!"Psychosocial said:I found them both to be awful in that movie, I don't deny that. But there's something about Michael Cera that simply grinds my gears. The way he acts, if you catch my drift? I can't stand the way he looks, I can't stand the way he talks, I can't stand the way he acts, simply. Year One was simply his worst work, hence why I bring that one up. The movie as a whole sucking was, as you say, not his fault entirely. But in my eyes, he was a majority of the shittiness.StriderShinryu said:Year One is undoubtedly one of the worst movies ever created.. but I fail to see how that's Cera's fault. If you're solely talking actors in it and not the obvious fail of whoever was actually in control of that mess, I'd put Jack Black up for just as much blame as Cera gets if not more since Black was the headliner. (Hmm.. Jack Black. Now there's an "actor" who really can't play more than one role)Psychosocial said:They're both bad movies, but they are nowhere near that bad. Year One beats them both bigtime.
agreed, and i also agree that hese very hit and miss, like i hated youth in revolt, but loved superbad, personal tastes ftwStriderShinryu said:Thanks for explaining that a little deeper. While I don't feel the same way about Cera as you do, I do understand what you're getting at. It's also nice to see someone able to articulate their dislike of Cera beyond just "I HATEZ HIM!!1!"Psychosocial said:I found them both to be awful in that movie, I don't deny that. But there's something about Michael Cera that simply grinds my gears. The way he acts, if you catch my drift? I can't stand the way he looks, I can't stand the way he talks, I can't stand the way he acts, simply. Year One was simply his worst work, hence why I bring that one up. The movie as a whole sucking was, as you say, not his fault entirely. But in my eyes, he was a majority of the shittiness.StriderShinryu said:Year One is undoubtedly one of the worst movies ever created.. but I fail to see how that's Cera's fault. If you're solely talking actors in it and not the obvious fail of whoever was actually in control of that mess, I'd put Jack Black up for just as much blame as Cera gets if not more since Black was the headliner. (Hmm.. Jack Black. Now there's an "actor" who really can't play more than one role)Psychosocial said:They're both bad movies, but they are nowhere near that bad. Year One beats them both bigtime.
Hmm. I did not know that. Although it doesn't surprise me. Although that was more believeable in the 80s. Nowadays people have figured out piranhas are mostly scavengers not exactly the creatures in that movie. But then again they made a horror movie about slugs so it doesn't matter in the big picture.Macheteswordgun said:Cause its a based on a horror movie from the 80'sSwifteye said:Have you seen the ads for Piranha 3D? if you did you must have noticed that it's one of the dumbest horror films in awhile. Honestly it feels like it's an element of 80s horror shlock which it just might be. Scott pilgrim is an acquired taste. reviews aren't really faithful with being glowing or condemming. But if you look at a few you may see what that you might like it. You can always not go to the movies and wait till they show up on dvd redbox etc.Psychosocial said:Fuck Scott Pilgrim, goddamn hipster shit, and fuck Michael Cera, fuck him and everything he stands for. He's the worst actor on this planet, and I've seen alot of terrible actors. Don't believe me? See Year One, that movie makes me want to kill kittens.
Nothing can be worse than a movie that has Michael Cera in it. Nothing.
The whole concept just feels childish and forced to me. I couldn't get into the graphic novel series, and I really dislike Michael Cera, so I see no purpose in it. It just feels like another case of author self-insert Mary Sue-ing.Geekosaurus said:You're a member of a gaming forum and you think Scott Pilgrim looks rubbish? I'm shocked. :/TheMaddestHatter said:Pirahana and Scott Pilgrim both look like crap to me.
I'm glad somebody can see it for what it is. I can pick faults in pretty much aspect of it.jaketheripper said:i hated that movie with a passion, it doesnt deserve a reopen, it fucking sucked
well yes, partly cuz scott pilgrim is also a comic and game, so i thought it would hold up as a better conversation, after all, scott pilgrim is a gaming iconOtakuNinja said:Gaming Discussion?
Small demographic for Scott Pilgrim? The movie is kind of a romantic comedy with awesome videogame inspired fightscenes/boss battles. That's just about the biggest demographic there is!Krion_Vark said:If it was expendables or Piranha he would say go see Piranha.Danzaivar said:Movie Bob will break into your house while you sleep and flay you alive if you choose Pirahna 3D.
(Note: He won't, but still...)
OT: I have to say that if you don't fit into the small demographic for the Scott Target Audience then I would say go see Piranha but since you are on here go see Scott.
Guys, have you even seen the movie? I'm gonna guess no. You're not qualified to judge it if you've never even given it a chance. Trust me, I've never really liked Michael Cera either, but Scott Pilgrim isn't his usual "sweet, sensitive boyfriend" character. He's actually got a surprising amount of depth here.Phoenixlight said:100% agree with this poster the guy is just fucking terrible, don't pay to see a film with him in it so he won't make as much money.Psychosocial said:Fuck Scott Pilgrim, goddamn hipster shit, and fuck Michael Cera, fuck him and everything he stands for. He's the worst actor on this planet, and I've seen alot of terrible actors. Don't believe me? See Year One, that movie makes me want to kill kittens.
Nothing can be worse than a movie that has Michael Cera in it. Nothing.