I actually have to agree with this. Though twice I had strange visual artefacts in Fallout 3, where when I looked around everything shot off to oblivion. But basically, New Vegas is where all the bugs came out to play for me.Scott Guthrie said:i have only ever had bugs in new vegas....
MajWound said:Morrowind only ever gave me problems when I installed graphics mods. Otherwise unblemished performance.
Oblivion on 360 had a couple AI glitches, but nothing game-breaking.
Fallout 3 on 360 was damn near perfectly well behaved.
New Vegas on PC was fucking atrocious.
The pattern seems to point to Bethesda not being as bad as I hear it is.
Too my own knowledge Bethesda is using a new engine "Creation Engine" as they are calling it. They are also using Havok's Behavior Technology for AI and animation on the game. So is it possible that the "creation engine" is a modified version of the Gamebryo? Possible, but from what was said on the information site, it's an engine that has been rewrote from every major system powering the gameplay experience. So I can't really say what that is supposed to mean.008Zulu said:Anyone who is familiar with the works of Bethesda should know by know just how unstable their products have been. Considering that each new game is built upon the reconditioned engine of the previous title, it wouldn't be too far of a stretch to think that Skyrim will be as bad (maybe worse) in the terms of stability.
Morrowind, Oblivion, Fallout 3 and Fallout New Vegas all built off slightly altered versions of the same engine. Since Skyrim is using a further modification of the Gamebryo engine, its a safe bet it will have it's fair share of problems come launch day.
From what I've heard from various hands-on stuff, people actually do stuff rather than wander around and occasionally eat invisible food. woodcutters actually cut wood, for instance. and the wood pile even grows as they add wood!Kizi said:The AI problem, I'm assuming it will be a bit hinky, let alone companion AI.
Off-topic though, I'm more concerned about the fact that they're dropping skills and simplifying the game ever so much.
It's Bethesda. I figured perfect, or at the very least "okay", was a mathematical improbability.theonlyblaze2 said:So...No option for an okay game?
I have never had any problems with any Bethesda game, and I have never once downloaded a patch.
Did you keep the receipt?Tax_Document said:MajWound said:Morrowind only ever gave me problems when I installed graphics mods. Otherwise unblemished performance.
Oblivion on 360 had a couple AI glitches, but nothing game-breaking.
Fallout 3 on 360 was damn near perfectly well behaved.
New Vegas on PC was fucking atrocious.
The pattern seems to point to Bethesda not being as bad as I hear it is.
I agree with you one hundred and ten percent, you receive a gift from me!
The gift of love.