Poll: So I found this "feminist" site

[TeletubbiesGolfGun]

snip

but you had said it before, therefore, it was of your belief, and it was fair game for them to call you out on it.

once again, "crazy pills", i must be eating a whole bottle of them...

it wasn't the fact that they "assumed" as such, it was the fact that you do have that belief, which is why they were calling you out on it.

next point?

 

[TeletubbiesGolfGun]

Babe, give 'em hell. I'll rejoin this hateboner gangrape attempt when I get back home.

oh how dominating of you.

I'll leave you a spot open on the side here, perfect 50 yard line seat.

 

[iTeamKill]

heh, if sucking a dick does all that to a women, I wonder what it does to a man. :3

 

[EstrogenicMuscle]

I don't see it attacking women who have sex with men, I see it attacking the social standard of femsub and maledom as the norm. That isn't attacking sex or female sex or men at all. I don't know where you're getting all of these so called "heterophobic" or "misandrist" accusations here, but the article is spot on.

IT'S NOT ATTACKING MALE SEXUALITY. IT'S ATTACKING MALE DOMINANCE.

Why is it that feminists cannot say something truthful or good or anything without being strawmanned?

 

[Phasmal]

I wonder how the website would interpret that.

Why would you care for the opinion of people who label themselves radfems?
(The word rad will forever just make me think of Fallout).

Radical people will probably find something wrong in what you do no matter what you do.

As an aside, I'm not really attracted to tattoos. Mostly because the only people I really know who have tattoos are my parents. But I do like knowing the stories behind them.