Asking the question "Is it ok to hit a woman?" is far too vague and open to too many unfair or wrong interpretations to be a useful poll.
(assumed) Consensus: Violence should be proportional. Hard blows should only be used if there is a risk of injury or death. Violence should never be a first resort.
(assumed) Consensus: Attacking someone who is physically weaker than oneself is never acceptable.
Personal note: These questions do not consider motivation. People may feel justified in attacking another, but that can't possibly be made a part of the questions at this point.
1: "What level of violence is acceptable when defending yourself from someone who is physically less strong than you, regardless of gender?"
a: Someone should bear the consequences of their own actions, regardless of their physical prowess, so no special consideration should be given to the weaker attacker.
b: The physically stronger person should not use their full strength (as of yet unquantified) against the weaker attacker.
2: "Is it more or less acceptable for one gender to defend themselves from the other gender, regardless of physical strength?"
a: Both genders should be equally accountable for their own actions.
b: Women should be granted (an as of yet unquantified) degree of privilige to attack men without retalliation.
c: Men should be granted (an as of yet unquantified) degree of privilige to attack women without retalliation.
edit:
Of course, the questions should be answered by men and women seperately.
(assumed) Consensus: Violence should be proportional. Hard blows should only be used if there is a risk of injury or death. Violence should never be a first resort.
(assumed) Consensus: Attacking someone who is physically weaker than oneself is never acceptable.
Personal note: These questions do not consider motivation. People may feel justified in attacking another, but that can't possibly be made a part of the questions at this point.
1: "What level of violence is acceptable when defending yourself from someone who is physically less strong than you, regardless of gender?"
a: Someone should bear the consequences of their own actions, regardless of their physical prowess, so no special consideration should be given to the weaker attacker.
b: The physically stronger person should not use their full strength (as of yet unquantified) against the weaker attacker.
2: "Is it more or less acceptable for one gender to defend themselves from the other gender, regardless of physical strength?"
a: Both genders should be equally accountable for their own actions.
b: Women should be granted (an as of yet unquantified) degree of privilige to attack men without retalliation.
c: Men should be granted (an as of yet unquantified) degree of privilige to attack women without retalliation.
edit:
Of course, the questions should be answered by men and women seperately.