Housebroken Lunatic said:
Kenjitsuka said:
Actually, commiting succesful suicide is really hard. Only three percent of people succeed the first time.
Why? Because it's usually a spur of the moment thing. In my case for your examples of sure fire ways: I can't get a hold of a gun because I live in the Netherlands, not the USA. And I couldn't get to a high building at 4 at night, because they where mysteriously all closed. I don't even live near any, plus I don't have a car to drive to one. Also, tall buildings are notoriously suicide proof; the windows are unbreakable and roof access is prevented by locks.
Anyway, back to my attempt, which in your opinion was appearantly just for show.
I took all of the pills I had, which was a hundred times the normal dose.
Turned out the most killing effect was blowing up your heart or causing your blood pressure to rise high enough for say a stroke.
Not a problem per se, so far. But I had severe hypotension and a very slow heartrate because of anorexia. So that was one problem. The other was that I suddendly launched al lot of half digested pills in a heavy emetic reaction (i.e. the pills make you vomit uncontrollably in a high dose). So, with an unknown amount of pills on the floor and not being dead after half an hour I decided to call an ambulance, because the only thing worse than the shame of failing at suicide is getting something like brain damage because you failed.
In many cases permanent disability is a result of unsuccesfull suicide. Not cool, especially when you already didn't want to continue to live...
A last note; "failsafe methods" do not exist. A shot to the head, jumping in front of a train... I know people who've survived that.
... Then there's tall bridges, railway tracks (just lie your head on the track and let the train sever it clean off when it arrives), electrical outlets (just bend a fork and hold on to one end), electrical wiring, there's drowning yourself etc. etc.
Several method statistically safer to kill you rather than swallowing pills.
Just out of curiosity: are you a man or a woman? (the answer would explain a thing or two)
I've taken the liberty of going to the only source I know as very much reliable for statistics: the book called "SUICIDE AND ATTEMPTED SUICIDE - METHODS AND CONSEQUENCES" by Geo Stone, published by Carroll & Graf Publishers, Inc. New York.
Electrocution by way of high voltage (NOT house current)
LETHAL INTENT: High
MORTALITY: 40 to 90 percent
Drowning:
Percent lethal: 76%.
LETHAL INTENT IN DRUG OVERDOSE: Highly variable, from nil to very high.
And for your last question, I am male, suffering from a myriad of mental ilnesses and handicaps.
PERMANENT INJURIES: Moderately likely.
Fourty to ninety percent, and that's ONLY from really high currents. So I'd have to break into an electric box on the street and cause a whole neighbourhood a day or so without power?
Jumping
LETHAL INTENT: High
FATALITIES: 40 to 60 percent
PERMANENT INJURIES: Frequent
Note from me; any bridges around here are above water and are not very high. I don't live in a town like yours I bet.
There is no specific information on train tracks, but how about this quote?
"Similarly, ten-year follow-up on ninety-four people who survived the usually lethal procedure of jumping in front of a train found no higher suicide rates than those who had sur-
vived less lethal methods". That's 94 VERY unhappy people. Also, at the time (4 AM) there where no trains running.