I'm going to have to agree with you too Monkeyman. Our bodies are held together by nuclear forces so the non-existence of forces like gravity can't make our bodies come apart. We would definitely just suffocate in the zero air enviro.Monkeyman8 said:I'm gonna assume you're serious and point out that a faulty seal wouldn't kill you with explosive decompression, you'd just suffocate to death.GODoftheRIGOVERSE said:The first astronauts to land on the moon died when ther hellmets failed to protect them from rapid decompression and their heads popped like grapes or cherries so the government faked the moon landing and paid off the families to say the actors were thoses dead astronauts so that the US could say we were the first on the moon until technology improved!!!
[http://photobucket.com/images/exploding%20head]
I have not seen their evidence, but my conspiracy theorist friends can site for hours their "proof" of correctness. I do not believe them because their proof is inadequate. As I believe we landed on the moon, I accept that Mythbusters has evidence. However, if I thought that other evidence was good enough to call conspiracy, it is unlikely that evidence offered on a television show would sway me. Possible, but unlikely.Rutawitz said:but they used the scientific method and actually came up with facts and proof2012 Wont Happen said:The confirmation of a TV show made by a company that could be paid by the governments resources easily doesn't mean a lot. I think we landed there due to lack of adequate evidence that we didn't, not because some media outlet told me so.Cimerax said:Yes, we landed on the moon.
Don't you watch Mythbusters??!?!?!?!?!?!?!
They actually confirmed it.
...AjimboB said:Some religious fundamentalists believe that it is impossible for a human to go past "the sky" (atmosphere), because that's where heaven is. Therefore, if it is impossible to go past the sky, it is impossible to reach the moon.Thaius said:Umm... I'm sorry, I have to ask. What on freaking earth does the moon landing have to do with religion? :/AjimboB said:Of course we landed on the moon. Anyone who says we haven't is just a religious nutcase.
I love to ask these kinds of people how satellite TV, and cellphones work. They always give such delightfully moronic answers.
Out of general respect for said insane conspiracy theorists as close personal friends I generally allow them to talk. I'm sure that the evidence Mythbusters provides is compelling, but since I already agree with them and I don't have any compelling reason to see the episode unless it happens to come on when nothing else good is on, I probably won't end up seeing it.Rutawitz said:maybe you should see the mythbusters evidence before writing them off.2012 Wont Happen said:I have not seen their evidence, but my conspiracy theorist friends can site for hours their "proof" of correctness. I do not believe them because their proof is inadequate. As I believe we landed on the moon, I accept that Mythbusters has evidence. However, if I thought that other evidence was good enough to call conspiracy, it is unlikely that evidence offered on a television show would sway me. Possible, but unlikely.Rutawitz said:but they used the scientific method and actually came up with facts and proof2012 Wont Happen said:The confirmation of a TV show made by a company that could be paid by the governments resources easily doesn't mean a lot. I think we landed there due to lack of adequate evidence that we didn't, not because some media outlet told me so.Cimerax said:Yes, we landed on the moon.
Don't you watch Mythbusters??!?!?!?!?!?!?!
They actually confirmed it.
besides, if youre willing to listen to insane conspiracy theorist then why not a television program?