Poll: Watchmen, will it be a Superman Returns, or a Dark Knight?

Recommended Videos

ObadiahBlack

New member
Sep 23, 2008
154
0
0
From what I keep hearing about the Lack of the Giant Alien Squid, then it's changed up way too much. The disaster, specifically that it was a supposed extra-terrestrial threat, was what caused the warring countires in question to STOP: to join forces to repel a greater danger. Changing the disaster from an alien to ANYTHING else, like a nuclear explosion (most logical second-guess for that time) would frame the Russians, leading the U.S. to attack them, to lead them to attack the U.S. and back-and-forth. It wouldn't be resolution by the world's greatest joke, it would be Mutually Agreed Destruction.

But that's just one part of the movie, so . . . finger's crossed!
 

whitemidget

New member
Jun 10, 2008
7
0
0
Crunchy English said:
It'll be a wretched, disgusting failure. Think about Dark Knight. What made Dark Knight awesome? It was original. I know that sounds nuts, I can hear you saying "Uh, Crunchy, I don't know if you know this, but Batman is like, the most prolific modern character in existence." And that's true, which is why it is so much more impressive that the Dark Knight did its own thing. The Dark Knight's Batman is not Burton's Batman, or Schumacher's Batman or even Kane's Batman. The Dark Knight's Joker is a different character than what we've seen in the past. And The Dark Knight's Two-Face was perhaps the finest iteration I've ever seen, but it owes little if anything to the Animated series, or the comics, or, God Help Us, Batman Forever.

Technically, Batman Begins and its sequels are rooted in "The Long Hallowe'en" but I think it's fair to say that the creators of these films broke any and all barriers in the comic they felt they needed too.

Watchman on the other hand, seems to be trying to placate the ravenous Watchmen fans. The Watchmen story has only been told once, and most people agree it was told as well as it ever could be. Snyder will do his shot-for-shot remake to try stop from upsetting the die hards, and ruin his chances at making a decent movie out of it in the process.

Umm, maybe that was too long a post, I think my point is pretty simple though:

"In order for a movie adaptation to be successful, its creators have to be able to tell the difference between vital themes of a story, and useless minutia. Dark Knight had a team that could do that. I'm not confident Watchmen does. And that's probably just because Watchmen deals with more complicated themes."
Ok, first off, I would like to preface this statement by mentioning that I am not trolling. I AM NOT TROLLING. Okay?

Can I please be the person to say this? TAKE THE DARK KNIGHT OFF THE PEDESTAL. This, and unfortunately, so does Watchmen, although it's a fine novel, represent everything that's wrong with Hollywood. I will point out a fine series of films, started out in the late eighties and continued into the mid-nineties, then stopped.

They were the original series of Batman films. They acknowledged what comic books, the source material were -- campy, unbelievable characters, inside an even campier, unbelievable universe. But then, New Millennium Lite came around, and "Campy" wasn't acceptable anymore.

Hollywood and video games are both trying to go the same way, and it drives me crazy. They try to make everything so realistic and believable. Slap a dark filter on, give your hero a stupid ninja origin story and a Batmobile that is obviously NOT a Lincoln Futura, 1960s era. Because the movie is now "believable", with real dangers of terrorism and a character (the Joker) who's been played to death twice, and some of the reason people even took notice was because of the actor, Heath Ledger, and his strange appearance. This interested me when I first saw the promotional materials.

Now the other half of people, upon hearing about Ledger's death, made a point to go and see this movie and coin it "his final, great performance". No one seems to point out that he's not in the movie enough to be considered a starring role, there's a HUGE plot hole involving his character, and the campy, unbelievability (OMG) that surrounds him.

Now, on to the point of this all - comic book movies are great when they're for fans. Comic books themselves are awesome. The Dark Knight was NOT a comic book story, it was a James Bond film with different colors. Or better yet, a discarded draft of Spiderman 3 with more morals.

It was a wonderfully made film, believe me when I say this, but I'm sick of everyone comparing every single comic book film ever made and yet to be made to it.

Watchmen may not be a huge hit just because of Moore's interpretation of how "super" these people are, and how more "human" they actually are. But it's a unique story, and it's almost impossible to make a sequel of, so I think we should all give it a chance. Shit, I saw Mortal Kombat: Annihilation. IN THEATRES.

Ok, sorry about that.
 

Double-O

New member
Jan 20, 2009
73
0
0
All this talk about a giant alien squid, surely at least THAT must make it a must read, even if one isn't inclined to spend there money on the movie
 

MrGFunk

New member
Oct 29, 2008
1,350
0
0
Trivun said:
Plenty of other things have been condensed that much. If there isn't enough time then it sets it up for a sequel, which may or may not be a good thing, and if there is then you'll be happy.
Oh. My. God.
(Vader Voice) Noooooooooooooo.

I am going to watch this film but the closer it gets the more worried I am. Hopefully, I'll go in thinking it's going to be rubbish and be pleasantly surprised.

B&C list stars aren't really a problem if they're directed well. They may not have had the breakout role yet and I like Billy Crudup.
Oh dear, getting my hopes up again.
 

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
Based on the trailer I predict Batman & Robin part 2.

I also predict a happy ending, the bad guy getting caught, Mr Mask surviving and the world getting saved in the manner the heroes intended. It's being made in Hollywood, Hollywood doesn't do dark, they just put a filter on the lense...
Spacelord said:
Simriel said:
IT lack giant squid, but thats okay. Change anything else, and your in failsville
But the giant squid's pretty crucial though. o_O They'll pretty much HAVE to change everything else, or at least a lot of it.
Actually your right... If theres no squid... then why would the comidean be killed? Also im kinda expecting an americanised happy ending... Which would suck... Because then the actual message of the story would be lost
 

Galletea

Inexplicably Awesome
Sep 27, 2008
2,877
0
0
I thoroughly enjoyed both films and V for Vendetta too. So if it is as good as any of those, I'll be happy.
 

Double-O

New member
Jan 20, 2009
73
0
0
am about to read the graphic novel now. this may or may not change my view on the upcoming movie
 

Syntax Error

New member
Sep 7, 2008
2,323
0
0
I'm reading the graphic novel right now because of the movie. It's one of my most anticipated for this year (and that's saying a lot, because I don't really go to theaters much). I'm at chapter 9, and from what I've read so far, it's a great book.

The problem I'm seeing here is that, would the movie have come too late? There is a lot of stuff going in the background of the story, and would those things carry over well at this time?

Oh yeah, Rorschach is now one of my favorite characters in anything. EVER.
 

wewontdie11

New member
May 28, 2008
2,661
0
0
Well all the hype surrounding the upcoming film inspired me to go and actually read the comic beforehand. While I thoroughly enjoyed reading it, it doesn't strike me as a story that would translate particularly well onto the big screen. It still has potential to be a good film but it's looking unlikely to me.
 

SomeBritishDude

New member
Nov 1, 2007
5,081
0
0
When I first watched the trailer, I thought it'd be awesome! Then I read the comic and heard about some of the changes that where being made (they've changed the ending. WHAT THE FUCK?!?!!) Now, I honestly have no idea. It could be the greatest comic book movie ever made that will be revolutionary and start a stream of AWESOME comic book movies. Or, it will be shit.
 

GenHellspawn

New member
Jan 1, 2008
1,841
0
0
Meh, it's probably not going to be as good as Sin City 2, but it'll be worth a watch, nonetheless.
 

not_tragedi

New member
Dec 24, 2008
26
0
0
The unfortunate fact is that the direct translation from comic to movie is bound to have some changes. They are keeping most of the scenes that probably would have been cut under other studios (aka the rape scene, the scene in the bar...without giving away too many spoilers for non-readers) and I feel that as long as it make cohesive sense in the film, we can make do with a change.

If all else cannot deter you from hating this before you see it, think of the fact that MTV had an open interest in producing it at one point.

Now shudder in fear.