I assume giving birth would hurt more because I heard that the male equivalent of giving birth is passing a golf ball through your penis. I imagine that would hurt a great deal more than getting kicked in the balls.
Poll: What hurts more: kicked in the balls or giving birth?
- Thread starter Everin
- Start date
Recommended Videos
this is just begging for a number 2 joke.... but i am far to civilized a european to fall for that temptation.KingofallCosmos said:
OT: there is no way to physically prepare for a kick in the balls, and it always hurts more than you ever imagine. Both physically and mentally... sometimes i think god put the balls on the outside of the body for the lulz, that unsophisticated prick...
I am in no way undermining the pain that comes from being "split"(forgive my ignorance) and having to shove 3-5kg from your waist, but it isn't something that comes as a surprise, and a woman's body was designed to give birth after all.
on the other hand our tea bags were never designed to be treated to violence and kinetic force. Nay, instead they are to be caressed, scratched and blown upon by a gentle breeze, and occasionally grace the face of a noob.... then again if there is a creator then my above mentioned theory must be true, to which i must reiterate what a complete douche god is.
I'll let a woman handle this one, because... damn, I don't even want to touch it.Glademaster said:
Thing is... giving birth is a normal and natural occurrence. It's SUPPOSED to happen. Women's bodies are designed for it. But balls aren't meant to be kicked.
So... that's a major thing to consider I think.
But of course it depends on how hard one is being kicked in the balls. And what kind of birth we're comparing it to. I mean, I imagine the easiest birth would certainly hurt less than the worst kick in the balls, the pain of which could go on for hours/days itself.
Anyway, I'm sure they're completely different pains. Maybe.
So... that's a major thing to consider I think.
But of course it depends on how hard one is being kicked in the balls. And what kind of birth we're comparing it to. I mean, I imagine the easiest birth would certainly hurt less than the worst kick in the balls, the pain of which could go on for hours/days itself.
Anyway, I'm sure they're completely different pains. Maybe.
To settle this, I would like to give everyone a bit of info.
A mans testicles are basically (in the sense of equality) outer ovaries. For there to be an exact same female feeling, getting kicked in the balls would be like if someone reached up inside you and kicked your ovaries.
I just wanted people to know...
A mans testicles are basically (in the sense of equality) outer ovaries. For there to be an exact same female feeling, getting kicked in the balls would be like if someone reached up inside you and kicked your ovaries.
I just wanted people to know...
Oh, I hears of gi
Actually, I saw an article a few years ago about sisters who were born with external testes.
thaluikhain said:Unfortunately, it's impossible for someone to have functional testicles and ovaries. Yeah, you're not interested in Lady Gaga anymore, are you?StBishop said:Is it possible for someone with XXY chromosomes to become pregant? If so it could be possible for someone to be kicked in the balls and become pregnant. That way we could sort this all out. For science!The_root_of_all_evil said:Tell you what...let's wait until someone can do both and ask them.
Even, so, the word I am looking for is "Eek!".WolfThomas said:
StBishop said:Is it possible for someone with XXY chromosomes to become pregant? If so it could be possible for someone to be kicked in the balls and become pregnant. That way we could sort this all out. For science!The_root_of_all_evil said:Tell you what...let's wait until someone can do both and ask them.
Actually, I saw an article a few years ago about sisters who were born with external testes.
As for your first point, you're wrong, it's been done. Will it still hurt? Yeah. But it can be done. As for the second one, a man's testicles are far, far tougher than they seem. It's surprisingly difficult to permanently damage them through blunt trauma. Long ago, The guys with easily damaged nuts didn't get to pass on their genes, so men today are left with 'nads that can take a hell of a lot of punishment.O maestre said:
I'd rather get kicked in the balls once than give birth, but I'd rather give birth than to be kicked in the balls repeatedly for several hours on end.
The comedian Dara O'Briain brought up pregnancy in his stand up. "during the labour the woman will make a choice between a cut or a tear." I'll leave you with that thought
i Would Argue That Being kicked in the Groin, By your Spouse who is giving birth would hurt most of all
i wouldn't have guessed at this but im not surprised, i mean aren't the japanese an exception to every rule...ever.ComradeJim270 said:
dont get me wrong tamakeri seems very disturbing, but hell i wouldn't be surprised if there was a japanese fetish based on birth giving
The same could be said, more or less, for any part of the human body. There aren't any bodyparts that are meant to be injured. Even the episiotomies already mentioned in this thread would be far less common if not for the strange idea that the most natural way for a woman to give birth is on her back with her legs up in stirrups, so you can't even say that's a part that's meant to be damaged.O maestre said:
Ok, I can think of one bodypart that's kind of supposed to be injured at some point, but a pregnant woman most certainly won't have it anymore. My point still stands.
