Poll: What is your opinion of PeTA?

Recommended Videos

CulixCupric

New member
Oct 20, 2011
847
0
0
Rewrench said:
The wording in poll makes me giggle.
"What is your opinion of PeTA?"
Is your opinion... ignorant, misguided or foolish?

A lot of the stupid things PETA does must be for attention.
Along with money, attention is also needed for these groups.
sorry about the wording.

OT: they might just be trying to get attention and want to play victim. although the whole "I'm a victim! oh woe!" thing is just selfish, the real victim is everyone they've ever euthanized, and yes, i refer to animals are everyones not everythings, because they are conscious beings, not inanimate objects.
 

Raggedstar

New member
Jul 5, 2011
753
0
0
Mostly negative. Some people are in it for the greater good and are intelligent people, but the higher-ups and more extreme members are nuts.

Trying to crash Westminster Dog Show by saying the AKC = KKK/Hitler/etc by going only for shock value rather than actual facts? Stupid.

Not promoting fur coats yet setting up fur coat donations so they can send them to third world countries and people that NEED them? A-OK!
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
Istvan said:
Hmm, I suppose they should stop supporting terrorism, stop supporting violence and stick to the rational arguments and actually important fights for animal rights rather than paying people to firebomb labs or declare the end of the world if people can kill virtual animals in a videogame.
Then, they wouldn't be PETA. That's pretty much all they have.
 

Togs

New member
Dec 8, 2010
1,468
0
0
CulixCupric said:
technically, humans are animals, because we're living organisms, and do not fit in the categories of plant, fungi, bacteria, virus, microbe, insect, arachnid, or mineral.

but i understand that you mean that our own survival comes first, and you mean to only say we need to preserve our species, correct?
It seems I didnt think my first post through enough and I apologise for its confrontational tone, Ill try and explain myself more civilly and thoroughly here.
For the record Im well aware that humans are animals, as for your second paragraph I agree with the 1st point but disagree with the second- humanities welfare and survival comes first but inflicting unnecessary suffering on animals is cruel and debatably evil.
I think where you and I are going to disagree strongly is about what constitutes "unecessary suffering"- to me animal testing for medical reasons counts as a necessary evil, doing so for cosmetics is an unnecessary one.
The same goes for farming methods- you'll get no arguement from me that the more intensive ones are incredibly cruel but in my mind they are necessary- people gotta eat, which Im sure is gonna illicit an arguement for veganism from you, which in my experience tend to be as pointless as any political or religious debate- I can explain my stance on that matter if you want but Id rather not because I doubt either of us will convince the other.
 

UrieHusky

New member
Sep 16, 2011
260
0
0
They have good intentions (as far as I know) but they go about it the entirely wrong way.
Getting incredibly sick of all their stupid stunts to be quite honest =/
 

Sixties Spidey

Elite Member
Jan 24, 2008
3,299
0
41
No better than terrorists. I'm not gonna bother proving my point. The writing is on the wall and you'd be blind not to see the truth from a mile away.
 

Nicragomi

New member
Jul 12, 2009
146
0
0
They're one of these organizations with a positive message, but with horrible execution.

 

Togs

New member
Dec 8, 2010
1,468
0
0
DRes82 said:
[

I don't agree. There are many humans out there that I wouldn't shed a tear for if they were in pain or dying. However, I can't think of any type of animal that I would wish harm or death to.
If you dont mind me asking why od you hold that opinion? As the only basis I can think of for it is mawkish sentimentality which is not sufficient in my opinion ot justify some of the behaviour that PETA members are infamous for, and I know that Im missing an angle in my analysis of it.
 

jawakiller

New member
Jan 14, 2011
776
0
0
You guys are horrid! You mock an organization that clearly only has animal's best interests at heart. Meat is murder!




I want some steak now.
 

Soviet Steve

New member
May 23, 2009
1,511
0
0
Saltyk said:
Then, they wouldn't be PETA. That's pretty much all they have.
The entire core of PETA is completely rotten, in addition to what I mentioned I suppose it would also be necessary to purge the leadership and the memberbase of extremists. This is just my suggestion for fixing it of course.
 

DracoSuave

New member
Jan 26, 2009
1,685
0
0
Saltyk said:
DracoSuave said:
A applaude the meaning of their cause, but find their hypocrasy to be distasteful.

I eat bacon in protest.
I'd eat bacon anyway. It's delicious.
I never said it was a difficult or onerous protest.
 

idodo35

New member
Jun 3, 2010
1,629
0
0
they mean good but they are just stupid... yea...
my advice is pick better targets!!! seriosly after they atacked cooking moma i was like WTF?!
:p
 

CulixCupric

New member
Oct 20, 2011
847
0
0
Togs said:
CulixCupric said:
technically, humans are animals, because we're living organisms, and do not fit in the categories of plant, fungi, bacteria, virus, microbe, insect, arachnid, or mineral.

but i understand that you mean that our own survival comes first, and you mean to only say we need to preserve our species, correct?
It seems I didnt think my first post through enough and I apologise for its confrontational tone, Ill try and explain myself more civilly and thoroughly here.
For the record Im well aware that humans are animals, as for your second paragraph I agree with the 1st point but disagree with the second- humanities welfare and survival comes first but inflicting unnecessary suffering on animals is cruel and debatably evil.
I think where you and I are going to disagree strongly is about what constitutes "unecessary suffering"- to me animal testing for medical reasons counts as a necessary evil, doing so for cosmetics is an unnecessary one.
The same goes for farming methods- you'll get no arguement from me that the more intensive ones are incredibly cruel but in my mind they are necessary- people gotta eat, which Im sure is gonna illicit an arguement for veganism from you, which in my experience tend to be as pointless as any political or religious debate- I can explain my stance on that matter if you want but Id rather not because I doubt either of us will convince the other.
i'm glad we can agree. btw, i do eat meat, i'm an omnivore, i just need it to stay healthy. i have a high metabolism, so i require a lot of protien, so i'm no vegan. :)
 

Emperor Nat

New member
Jun 15, 2011
167
0
0
It's fine to stick up for animals. I think animal cruelty is a bad thing. I think it should stop.

Anyone who claims that an animal should be considered equal to a human however has missed something. And anyone who persecutes people in order to make sure a cow is happy is a bloody moron (the latter not specifically directed at PeTA, more a general comment).

And sorry if you disagree, but meat is damn tasty.
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
DracoSuave said:
Saltyk said:
DracoSuave said:
A applaude the meaning of their cause, but find their hypocrasy to be distasteful.

I eat bacon in protest.
I'd eat bacon anyway. It's delicious.
I never said it was a difficult or onerous protest.
Speaking of bacon.
Gotta love bacon.
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
they a re terrorist, besides the THOUSANDS of animals they put to death, the misuse of their fund to help out convicts and criminals, their close association to ELF and ALF (who have been legally declared domestic terrorist by the US), and being hypocritical shit heads who don't have a clue, i think they are.......well everything i just said!