That means they did a good job on presentation, the whole point of the mission is to invoke a sense of self-disgust. Bringing forth the question of "If you were an American agent, sent undercover to infiltrate terrorist group, and were under orders to do ANYTHING to make sure they accept you as one of their own, and that included mowing down innocent civillians in an airport, would YOU be able to do it?"cthulhu257 said:Sorry for mentioning it again, but No Russian was the only time I've ever been a bit concerned about violence. Then I remembered it's a video game, same as all the other games where I kill civilians.
I own a copy of Barbie's horse adventure.Pielikey said:Barbie's horse adventure.
Seriously, I think that mission in Modern Warfare 2 and Grand Theft Auto pretty much sums it up. Also, Left 4 Dead 2's gore-o-vision every time you melee an enemy is kind of ridiculous, but that doesn't really make it the most violent game out there.
No, the second with Wii controls. You actually do the motions to kill people... All these people saying FEAR and MW2 need to get out more...Editos said:Manhunt (the first one)
The main difference is that you are playing the terrorists and you are gunning down people that are not shooting back. If they are shooting back, then it would feel alright, but "no Russian" was not like that.Liquid Squid said:Why is everyone saying No Russian? I know it was bad but its just alot of people dying, you kill people all the time in cod?
this wins.Continuum said:Unfortunately I am desensitized to video game violence to the extent where I find gore to be quite excellent. I think MadWorld is pretty bad for it.