Poll: which is the best online shooter

[Mr.Pandah]

Rofl wheres Counter Strike?

 

[smallharmlesskitten]

Halo IMO and in quite a few other opinions is now the Mario of the 360. Purged with Fire and Salt. Halo 3 wasn't great, the only one I liked was 2 and thats strectching my puke-o-meter level. AND I have still played better games than TF2. Play whatever you want just don't teabag on other peoples choices to make yourself seem like more of a man.

I had some guy bag on me today at school for playing CS 1.6 when Source was SO much better.. It really gets on your tits and I can understand that. Just tell them where to shove their opinion as you don't really care.

Enough with the arguing over Halo and Team Fortress Two.

Just go play Day Of Defeat:Source........The new messiah of FPS's

 

[kanyatta]

There's no TF2 option, so I decided to contribute and put COD4, because it is the best online shooter of the choices available (with the PC version being superior to the 360/PS3 version, in my opinion). I've never played Warhawk, so I have no opinion on that, but judging by the fact I haven't heard of it, it can't be THAT amazing. GRAW2 was really fun, but wore off quickly. Vegas 2 is far superior to Vegas, but I still play both online. Resistance is basically a mediocre Unreal Tournament. Halo 3 just isn't that great all around, and XBL's cornucopia of retards doesn't help it at all, and Gears's online was not fun, especially when compared to the single player, and again has the problems of XBL's community.

PS3 crowd are friendly? Yes, I'm a 360 player and I'll admit live is full of stubborn idiots, but I have a friend who is ps3 player and as soon as I say that one little thing 360 does better than the ps3 he starts disagreeing with my opinion and saying that I'm an idoit and how the 360 sucks. Even when I agree that the ps3 is better in some fields than the 360 he's still being stubborn dick. So a majority of ps3 player are stubborn and don't respect opinions of other people.

I agree with you. Most PS3 users are fanboys who can't admit the PS3 has any faults and use irrational logic to back it up. I guess they don't want to admit they made a $600 mistake buying a PS3, since they could have saved $200 and gotten a console with more positive aspects; or spent the money on a new PC.

 

[The Wooster]

I agree with you. Most PS3 users are fanboys who can't admit the PS3 has any faults and use irrational logic to back it up. I guess they don't want to admit they made a $600 mistake buying a PS3, since they could have saved $200 and gotten a console with more positive aspects; or spent the money on a new PC.

You do see the irony there right?


Day of defeat never really did it for me. I suppose it's because I'm totally burnt out on WW2. If it was vietnam though that would be awesome.

"CHARLIE DON'T TEABAG"

 

[kanyatta]

You do see the irony there right?

The 360 has more than its fair share of faults, and I'll be the first one to admit it. I just can't stand talking to PS3 fans who think it is transcendent perfection, or crafted with the carpentry mallet of Jesus Christ or something like that...

 

[The Wooster]

Now do you see what your idle hands have wrought? You've brought the console wars to our village. You must leave.

 

[Nozer]

While I agree with most people that its a bit strange not having TF2, CS or BF2/2142 im gonna pick something different, not because I want to be different, just because its my fav game to play online. Im going with ET: Quake Wars

 

[Lord Krunk]

TF2 invisibly won a competition it wasn't invited to. Hilarious, really.

 

[Alpha001]

Where the fuck is CSS?!!?

 

[Bulletinmybrain]

I can't believe gears doesn't have more people behind it..Its like unreal tournment but lamer.

 

[Bulletinmybrain]

I agree with you. Most PS3 users are fanboys who can't admit the PS3 has any faults and use irrational logic to back it up. I guess they don't want to admit they made a $600 mistake buying a PS3, since they could have saved $200 and gotten a console with more positive aspects; or spent the money on a new PC.

You do see the irony there right?


Day of defeat never really did it for me. I suppose it's because I'm totally burnt out on WW2. If it was vietnam though that would be awesome.

"CHARLIE DON'T TEABAG"

That he bought a console with a failure rate through the roof?

 

[Lord Krunk]

Where the fuck is CSS?!!?

We can't list it until we can locate and examine all servers. We're still searching for the elusive one with polite users, complete sentences, balanced teams, good map rotation and cooperation.

Oh man. So true. But what's Halo doing there then? And what about TF2? TF2 PEOPLE!

 

[Bulletinmybrain]

Where the fuck is CSS?!!?

We can't list it until we can locate and examine all servers. We're still searching for the elusive one with polite users, complete sentences, balanced teams, good map rotation and cooperation.

Oh man. So true. But what's Halo doing there then? And what about TF2? TF2 PEOPLE!

I think he doesn't like the pc. Or great class based games in general.

 

[Arcticflame]

No, it will feature class based gameplay, both in co-op storylines and multiplayer. A fair few of those classes will be "So damn awesome"-er versions of the existing TF2 classes (eg the Medic class can actually siphon off enemies health into teammates, and the Heavy can deploy shields after accumulating kills). One such class is called Psy-Ops. There is no possible meaning behind this that can't be awesome.

If this game is truely so awesome for you to speak like it's a gift from every god ever, I'll reserve judgement and get back to you,

1 - Team Fortress 2 is built around fundamentally flawed concepts: a class-based team shooter having largely linear maps with only one gametype. No matter how good they make the game the classes will never be perfectly balanced and the maps will come down to a few near-perfect strategies that can only be beat by a few other strategies. Don't argue against this because you'll be lying.

There are multiple gametypes, CTF, CP, TC, and Cart (don't know the abbrev for that one).

What the heck do you mean by "largely linear" anyway? I am rather confused by that.

it's fresh and distinctive but it is held back because it is flawed at its core

I don't see how at all.

Your other points are just assertions, or you rambling.