Presumably because they disagree with your opinion.Diablo27 said:
Personally, I didn't like the MW2 campaign much. The majority of levels didn't require much thought-it wasn't as tactical as cod4, nor as challenging.
They also went in the direction of completely packing the game with action. Now, this I consider bad for a couple of reasons. I like frantic bits of game. However, I like it to be balanced out by slower sections. It makes the game less repetitive, and adds some suspense.
They took a similar approach to the story. It was spectacular. In block capitals. Again and again and again. Perhaps my favourite part about cod4 is the fact that, instead of being some kind of hero on a giant scale, it deliberately alternates to smaller scale, covert missions, and builds up from there. Cod4s story was well balanced. It had the really impressive stuff, balanced by the cloak and dagger, and MW2 doesn't manage this for me. It takes the spectacular elements which were successful in cod4(such as the character death) and repeats them over and over, which only lessens the impact.
