Poll: Who do YOU believe fired the Shot Heard Around the World?
- Thread starter Hectix777
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Im going to say MM, simply because most werent trained soldiers. BTW im American if my answer if you wanted that.
Yes, the Americans took on the British Empire all alone, it's not like they had help from other world powers or that the British armies had completely overextended themselves. -_- anyway, Belgium fired first.
Lemme start off by saying thank you for what you posted, which raised my opinion of you. And I do thank for portraying my forefather as such. And the French Canada and Brit Canada thing may be another war in the future, possibly. But that all depends on Luck, Probability, Quantum Mechanics, but mostly with a dice roll(doomsday arcade anyone?). Besides, why can't Canadians see themselves as Canadians instead of French or English Canadians? They're Canada now, not colonies. And the whole US territory for profit, I was taught that that Louis XVI of France helped the US as both a middle finger to England and a chance for Louis XVI to redeem himself for his failure of a rule. Not saying your wrong, I mean what every country loves is green and made of paper.emeraldrafael said:
Again, washington didnt know. And unless you know french, you wouldnt either. Hindsight is 20/20 but foresight is never so clear. No one at the time thought this would be such a big thing He put the only people at risk before him, which was his men. Its easy to say such things now, but in the situation, either youw ould be a terrible general and sent all your men to their deaths without concern or you would have been a good general and folded as well.this isnt my name said:
i would say its the south africans that traveled back intime to give the south AK47s so that they will win the war and slavery wouldnt be abolished.
What thats the wrong war.
Id say the two sides would havefired on each other at the same time. as in impossible to tell. cause there would be people on both sides with itchy trigger fingers. im assuming they a both using similar weapons with similar ranges.
What thats the wrong war.
Id say the two sides would havefired on each other at the same time. as in impossible to tell. cause there would be people on both sides with itchy trigger fingers. im assuming they a both using similar weapons with similar ranges.
ARe you not reading?Hectix777 said:
WASHINGTON COULDNT READ FRENCH, AND NO ONE (FRANCE, BRITAIN, THE COLONIES, ANYONE) HAD ANY IDEA HOW FAR THIS WOULD GO AT THE TIME
He saw the moment for what it was, which was my mine are in danger. I'll sign this now, because I odnt have the time to wait, and if I dont it will escalate to war. Then I will take me punishment, and hopefully things will work out better.
No one, at the time, saw war coming.
I meant the war for profit was the French and Indian/Seven Years War. That was fought from... um...1760s I think. Sorry, its been a while since I've had that class. By the time the Revolutionary war came, it was a case of the enemy of my enemy is my friend (which is one of the reasons why France saw this as a good opportunity and to align themselves with the States).Hectix777 said:
Its very confusing, and both early wars stretch far beyond France/Natives vs Colonies/Britain and States vs Britain. They in the truest sense were the first world wars.
As for Canadians, I wouldnt know, you'd have to ask them.
