Wow, I was thinking I was going to be against the topic creator here, but most of the posters are bothering me. People saying they are not a Star Trek fan obviously would not be bothered by the change of actor, thus their opinion on this would be little more than moot. Now I saw one person mention the whole "Daniel Craig is not James Bond" thing, and I do believe it is true, since he does what he can to NOT do what Bond is known for. Now, if this new guy tries to live up to Shatner's most known role and does not try to tarnish it, then I will be fine but if he tries to make Kirk not Kirk, then I have a problem. Also, Kirk era Star Trek I love because it just seems more fun and out there. Picard is a better captain of a serious Star Trek, but Kirk was more lovable in the origional's obsurdness.