Poll: Would You shoot at Protestors?

Recommended Videos

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
Depends... if they were shouting some kind of hate speech then yeah. I would try to get tear gas in their hate spreading mouths... but if not then no.
 

UberNoodle

New member
Apr 6, 2010
865
0
0
It depends on what the protestors were doing. If by 'shoot them' you meant to do so JUST because they were protesting, then no, I wouldn't (want to) do it. If shooting at them was in response to their own dangerous, or life threatening actions, then it would be a warranted response. If they were just creating inconveniences, then I wouldn't (want to) shoot at them. People cause inconveniences every day. We don't want to set a precendent of being able to tear-gas and bruise with rubber bullets the poeple that inconvenience or obstruct you! ;) I guess it comes down to whether or not the protesters are law abiding, and whether or not the police themselves are too.
 

Gonad23

New member
Aug 3, 2009
42
0
0
This is discusting, the ammount of people that would actually harm someone doing something they have every right to do.
If people never protested think were the world would be today. 99% of the population would have no welfare, money or rights.

Another point - so many of you have said "well, if I was a police officer then it would be my job, so yeah" since when is it acceptable that police (that are meant to be protecting us) go about shooting people that are peacefully demonstrating injustices?

Basically if you said yes, you are no better than a nazi, because you cleary do not question any orders you are given, you blindly carry them out based on the governments determination of right and wrong. Think for yourself people.
 

Gonad23

New member
Aug 3, 2009
42
0
0
Kinguendo said:
Depends... if they were shouting some kind of hate speech then yeah. I would try to get tear gas in their hate spreading mouths... but if not then no.
Bullets are much more "hateful" than words you know. It would actually be you "spreading the hate". Think!!!!
 

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
Gonad23 said:
Kinguendo said:
Depends... if they were shouting some kind of hate speech then yeah. I would try to get tear gas in their hate spreading mouths... but if not then no.
Bullets are much more "hateful" than words you know. It would actually be you "spreading the hate". Think!!!!
No, no it wouldnt. Hitler shooting himself, a bad thing in your eyes?
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
heyheysg said:
So they're basically sitting there jamming up traffic, reducing tourism.
Heaven forbid they reduce tourism!

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ArsonMurderAndJaywalking

If they've committed a breach of the peace, they know the rules. If they haven't, "Sir, up yours, sir!"
 

Brandon237

New member
Mar 10, 2010
2,959
0
0
If they got dangerously out of hand I would shoot them with rubber bullets. Never with real bullets. Tear gas I would use if they even back chatted. hippies...
 

chiefohara

New member
Sep 4, 2009
985
0
0
Depends on what the protest is over and if it turned violent or not. Free Speech is free speech, warts and all.

Attacking the crowd excessively and without provacation does more to undermine order in the long run though.

And anyone here who chanted a 'Hell Yeah, let me at those hippies' attitude are the last people on earth who should be allowed to become police officers.
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
You need an other option.

I might, but it would depend. If the protest was non-violent, no. (You called them a mob, but that's still pretty ambiguous)

If people were getting hurt, or badly inconvenienced (they were stopping individual cars and harrassing them or something) then yes.

Also, for some causes, I might well be among the protestors.
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,190
0
0
xDarc said:
That's pretty damn scary, although sadly, unsurprising. Some of those cops were probably just freaked out and overreacting, but unfortunately some of them would have just been sadists.

What was the riot about anyway?
 

Sir_Tor

New member
Nov 29, 2009
479
0
0
Only if they are behaving voilent or I start to feel threatned. And besides it's tear gas and rubber bullets! Now water would be awesome to shoot at them. Seeing them all being mowed down by zeh powah of ze watah!
 

Kyouki1980

New member
May 26, 2008
70
0
0
heyheysg said:
Let's say you joined the Police/Army and called out to face the mob of the day.

Some are protesting War, corrupt Governments, Workers rights.

So they're basically sitting there jamming up traffic, reducing tourism.

Your commanding officer orders you to start throwing tear gas and shoot rubber bullets and those hippies.

What do you do and why?
I turn around and shoot my commanding officer then drop the tear gas amongst the soldiers or police around me.
 

Mr Wednesday

New member
Jan 22, 2008
412
0
0
This topic is disgusting. The right to protest is a vital part of our democratic system that so many died to protect.


Shame on every last one of you who said yes.
 

wooty

Vi Britannia
Aug 1, 2009
4,252
0
0
Depends, if it was protests against forced movement or a new tax, then I wouldnt shoot

If it was the climate camp or the idiots still protesting to not invade Iraq, then yes, by all means give them a volley
 

Srdjan

New member
Mar 12, 2010
693
0
0
Well I know protesters, and I know they can piss people off, and I can be pissed off very easily so they would be shot, with rubber bullets first, but if they get violent live ammunition is only option