I don't understand what the length of a campaign has to do with how good it is. Everyone says MW2s campaign was too short. They said Black Ops campaign is too short. Then they rave about how awesome the Cod4 campaign is and how it was the best story ever. Guess what, it was about 6-8 hours long.AmrasCalmacil said:I shall never buy it!
Mostly 'cause giving Activision money via my WoW subscription is bad enough, and I don't like Call of Duty seeing as the campaign is 8 hours long and I'll never use the multiplayer.
That's good, the more people show up the exploits in the game the more likely Treyarch will be to fix that kind of crap. Keep going.kouriichi said:Multiplayer. I love trolling the kind way. Like we were daisy chaining Second Chance pro to piss people off in TDM.
The fine score was 7500 ((my team)) to 1900. They called us hackers. *snicker* oh! So much fun.
Yeah. Because No Russian didn't start enough flame warsCkretAznMan said:I wanted to see the My Lai level, but they didn't have it.
Would sorta be pointless, then you could rig matches and gain a ton of cod points.subject_87 said:My question is this: Why can't you play the cool new game modes (gun game, etc.) in local multiplayer?
GoldenMech said:I personally bought it for a little of everything.
No, seriously, why isn't that an option? You just said "sure you might want if for everything"... Exactly! There should be an alternative! Just cause the campaign drew you in more than the other aspects, doesn't mean others can't feel equally drawn to it by all elements?smeghead25 said:Because they said 'mostly'. Which bit were you looking forward to most overall? Sure you might want it for everything, but for me I was really interested to see what the campaign has to offer.atled3 said:Why isn't this answer an option on the poll?GoldenMech said:I personally bought it for a little of everything.