Kayner100 said:a question you couldnt answer unless put in that situation
Pink dragon said:I would kepp it.It is a human being it has the right to live
The second sentence in my quote answers your question. With the way the US government hunts those who are stigmatized with child support down, suicide is basically the only way to truly escape it.TriggerUnhappy said:Wait, then what would you do if your girlfriend didn't agree?Kevlar Eater said:If the girlfriend or wife agrees, I'd have that baby aborted without a second thought.
I'd kill myself before I would raise (or pay child support for) a retard with the permanent mindset of a toddler.
are we still talking about a child here? cos they way your saying it makes it sound like a dog or a peice of furniture, this is a human being, do-you-understand? i think you dont understand how valuable life really is. So what your saying is that the child would prefer to be dead than alive with a mental disability? is this child now suddenly a second class citizen now that it has a disability, you cant kill a child because of what your or its life might be like, too many people here think of themselves more than the actual child involvedPlurralbles said:Kayner100 said:a question you couldnt answer unless put in that situationPink dragon said:I would kepp it.It is a human being it has the right to live
No it isn't and no it doesn't.
It's pretty cut and dry. Abort it. I would not marry a woman stupid enough to think that keeping it would be okay. No, it's not okay. It' not fair to you, your spouse, or your other, normal children. Its not fair to tax payers who you will apply to get money from. I'ts keeping teh child alive because of guilt, how is that fair? How can we debate that a 2 week old fetus has the right to live a life perpetually stunted in its development? That's more unfair than killing it. What if something happened to you and your spouse? You're screwing over whoever has to care for it then.
But, at its mental capacity, is it even a human being? What makes us human is our intelligence, while the kid will never possess any, to the point where it is nearly a vegetable. I know the same could be said of infants, but they will change and grow up, whereas your kid would do nothing but grow older. So, what is the point of letting it live when it will do nothing but cause suffering?Kayner100 said:are we still talking about a child here? cos they way your saying it makes it sound like a dog or a peice of furniture, this is a human being, do-you-understand? i think you dont understand how valuable life really is. So what your saying is that the child would prefer to be dead than alive with a mental disability? is this child now suddenly a second class citizen now that it has a disability, you cant kill a child because of what your or its life might be like, too many people here think of themselves more than the actual child involvedPlurralbles said:Kayner100 said:a question you couldnt answer unless put in that situationPink dragon said:I would kepp it.It is a human being it has the right to live
No it isn't and no it doesn't.
It's pretty cut and dry. Abort it. I would not marry a woman stupid enough to think that keeping it would be okay. No, it's not okay. It' not fair to you, your spouse, or your other, normal children. Its not fair to tax payers who you will apply to get money from. I'ts keeping teh child alive because of guilt, how is that fair? How can we debate that a 2 week old fetus has the right to live a life perpetually stunted in its development? That's more unfair than killing it. What if something happened to you and your spouse? You're screwing over whoever has to care for it then.
It's 2 weeks into the pregnancy. It would be perfectly happy to stay in the womb just as it is. With a few tweeks, we can make it start developing into another animal at this point. At this point, there's no reason to worry about its wants.Kayner100 said:are we still talking about a child here? cos they way your saying it makes it sound like a dog or a peice of furniture, this is a human being, do-you-understand? i think you dont understand how valuable life really is. So what your saying is that the child would prefer to be dead than alive with a mental disability? is this child now suddenly a second class citizen now that it has a disability, you cant kill a child because of what your or its life might be like, too many people here think of themselves more than the actual child involvedPlurralbles said:Kayner100 said:a question you couldnt answer unless put in that situationPink dragon said:I would kepp it.It is a human being it has the right to live
No it isn't and no it doesn't.
It's pretty cut and dry. Abort it. I would not marry a woman stupid enough to think that keeping it would be okay. No, it's not okay. It' not fair to you, your spouse, or your other, normal children. Its not fair to tax payers who you will apply to get money from. I'ts keeping teh child alive because of guilt, how is that fair? How can we debate that a 2 week old fetus has the right to live a life perpetually stunted in its development? That's more unfair than killing it. What if something happened to you and your spouse? You're screwing over whoever has to care for it then.