Perhaps I'm missing something, but I thought the Nobel Peace Prize was usually awarded for more than telling people in other countries to stop acting like jerks. Plenty of people have spoke out against nuclear weapons on a global scale before Obama.Labyrinth said:No, it's a genuine thing.grimsprice said:Its just one massive PR job to try and save face when he can save the country from descending into chaos. Honestly, no president could ever affect the country, let alone Obama. Presidents don't have power, they're in office to draw attention away from it. He's got a good pr department though...
Obama has done a lot. His speech in Cairo encouraging understanding between cultures. His call for the disarming of nuclear weapons globally. It's not a matter of "Let's make him look good" because that's not the task of the Nobel committee. They're there to acknowledge concerted efforts.
I can't help but feel it's a bit political at this point. He hasn't been in office very long, and I haven't seen him do very much (most of his policies have been mucked up in paperwork and deliberations). Talking does not equate to action in any way. It just seems strange to award a politician a Peace Prize for being a good speaker. Sort of like awarding Garfield a prize for eating pasta.