XiVViX said:
There is a huge difference between a creationist pastor and an evolutionary biologist. The pastor bases his beliefs on a single ancient book, whereas the biologist bases his beliefs on evidence and experimentation. Could the biologist POSSIBLY be lying and POSSIBLY have gotten his lies past peer review? Certainly. Plenty of things are possible. It is possible that right now if I walk outside I will be struck by a crashing airplane. Does that possibility mean I should stay inside for fear of falling aircraft?
And yes, most strong atheists could be considered 'closed-minded'. They are making a claim to KNOW that something does NOT exist, when proving a negative is nigh impossible. However, you will find that the vast majority of atheist are 'weak' or 'agnostic' atheists precisely for this reason.
And I would really like to know what in the world you mean by that last sentence.
Well, I think you at least understand. I just don't think it's fair to call creationists stupid because they believe what they've been told, just like the rest of us. We've never seen a primary source, at least not most of us. You appreciate what I'm trying to say, right?
Similarly, most religious people are the same way. Most aren't close-minded, they just get offended a lot by strong athiest douchebags. Sure, there are fundies, but there are athist fundies too. I have no issue with atheism, it's the assholism that is so often associated with it. Just like the way most of them view Christianity.
The last sentance is as it reads. Both strong athiesm and religious fundamentalism are steeped in ignorence, the close-minded nature to be unable to accept the possibility that you
just don't know. Ironically, it's more ignorant to say you know than don't. It's an interesting paradox.