umm....How the fuck did you extract that from the OP?Gerazzi said:I'm with ya.thiosk said:so, what youre saying is, that rape is a healthy release of sexual frustration?
I now believe that everyone is fucked up.
as in: what I was going to say.
Well said, me.scotth266 said:Rape games are essentially interactive porn: that is their purpose, the intent behind their creation.
That having been said: porn is legal in the US, even the raping variety. So I fail to see us having any right to criticize the Japanese.
Also, one must wonder at the source of the uproar behind this: is it that the rapes are in the games, that they can be performed (as in, they are interactive), or that they are the goal?
In the case of the first option, I would like to remind everyone that rape has been a common factor used in both art, music, and movies for quite some time now (the latter especially so if you're a vivid watcher of Lifetime Movies like my mother is). Before you ban rape in games, you must ban it in all mediums.
With regards to the second option: I think that this isn't the real issue people draw with the game either. If rape were put into the game as a tool for pushing the storyline, or just as an extra option added to a sandbox game like GTA (as in, it would be a extra thing to do, and not the overall objective), people would get angry, but not as angry as they are now. That's just being realistic: we can't say NO USING RAPE to game developers, because that's discrimination against the medium. It's in the same school of thought as the Hide Your Children [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HideYourChildren] trope of game development, and I object to that. Why should we tell people that they can't use rape or child violence in games when they could be used to tell a story or make a point?
When venturing into the third option, I must say that my morals make me inclined to agree: rape as the goal of a game is disgusting. But should we generally ban rape in games just because of this? Or more importantly: why should we?
I think that rape in games, for better or worse, is here to stay. All we can do is use our wallets to decide the context in which it is used.
A lot of rape victims feel differently. Rape is a form of torture, and I'd be disguisted if rape games were available in Australia (probably because games that show a hint of a breast are given a fast banhammer, let alone games that have a sex scene).mike1921 said:Really? It doesn't effect the victim? It ends their life! I'd rather be raped and continue living than not continue living.
Very well said, and you seem smart enough to answer me on one thing, why do you act as if using a game as porn is disgusting? Or why do you think the rape fetish is so disgusting when it's not brought into the real world?scotth266 said:To quote myself:
Well said, me.scotth266 said:Rape games are essentially interactive porn: that is their purpose, the intent behind their creation.
That having been said: porn is legal in the US, even the raping variety. So I fail to see us having any right to criticize the Japanese.
Also, one must wonder at the source of the uproar behind this: is it that the rapes are in the games, that they can be performed (as in, they are interactive), or that they are the goal?
In the case of the first option, I would like to remind everyone that rape has been a common factor used in both art, music, and movies for quite some time now (the latter especially so if you're a vivid watcher of Lifetime Movies like my mother is). Before you ban rape in games, you must ban it in all mediums.
With regards to the second option: I think that this isn't the real issue people draw with the game either. If rape were put into the game as a tool for pushing the storyline, or just as an extra option added to a sandbox game like GTA (as in, it would be a extra thing to do, and not the overall objective), people would get angry, but not as angry as they are now. That's just being realistic: we can't say NO USING RAPE to game developers, because that's discrimination against the medium. It's in the same school of thought as the Hide Your Children [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HideYourChildren] trope of game development, and I object to that. Why should we tell people that they can't use rape or child violence in games when they could be used to tell a story or make a point?
When venturing into the third option, I must say that my morals make me inclined to agree: rape as the goal of a game is disgusting. But should we generally ban rape in games just because of this? Or more importantly: why should we?
I think that rape in games, for better or worse, is here to stay. All we can do is use our wallets to decide the context in which it is used.
Well that's them. Also, let's just say australia didn't ban videogames, then would you have a problem with rape games?Dys said:A lot of rape victims feel differently. Rape is a form of torture, and I'd be disguisted if rape games were available in Australia (probably because games that show a hint of a breast are given a fast banhammer, let alone games that have a sex scene).mike1921 said:Really? It doesn't effect the victim? It ends their life! I'd rather be raped and continue living than not continue living.
Rape is a form of torture, it fucks people. And it sure as all hell doesn't affect the victim, if she (or he) have any close family or friends, they will be forever changed. Murder is different, it can be justified with (he was a terrorist or he eats kittens) and is therefore somewhat humanized, rape cannot ever be justified. A rapist is never a good guy.
It's like saying that the person would be better off raping than murdering, understand.mike1921 said:umm....How the fuck did you extract that from the OP?Gerazzi said:I'm with ya.thiosk said:so, what youre saying is, that rape is a healthy release of sexual frustration?
I now believe that everyone is fucked up.
as in: what I was going to say.
Wait , being better than murder makes something good?Gerazzi said:It's like saying that the person would be better off raping than murdering, understand.mike1921 said:umm....How the fuck did you extract that from the OP?Gerazzi said:I'm with ya.thiosk said:so, what youre saying is, that rape is a healthy release of sexual frustration?
I now believe that everyone is fucked up.
as in: what I was going to say.
While the original comment was a bit strong, I still think that would be around what I would say given the attention span.
are we talking from personal experience?RRilef said:Because rape is more of an issue. I hate to say it, but it is so much easier to see the damage murder does than that of rape. It is easy to tell murder is bad, but for some sick people rape lies on the border and when you're drunk, you still know killing someone is bad, but rape may not seem like such a bad idea to you at the time. Also the fact that rape occurs more often in real life may have a factor.
I didn't say that first bit. I have no problem with people using games as porn: hell, one of the reasons that I dislike the ESRB is that it prevents the possibilty of a American adult game industry.mike1921 said:Very well said, and you seem smart enough to answer me on one thing, why do you act as if using a game as porn is disgusting? Or why do you think the rape fetish is so disgusting when it's not brought into the real world?
Anyone sick enough to think rape is on the border is probably also sick enough to think murder is on the border.RRilef said:Because rape is more of an issue. I hate to say it, but it is so much easier to see the damage murder does than that of rape. It is easy to tell murder is bad, but for some sick people rape lies on the border and when you're drunk, you still know killing someone is bad, but rape may not seem like such a bad idea to you at the time. Also the fact that rape occurs more often in real life may have a factor.
I didn't say that first bit. I have no problem with people using games as porn: hell, one of the reasons that I dislike the ESRB is that it prevents the possibilty of a American adult game industry.scotth266 said:Very well said, and you seem smart enough to answer me on one thing, why do you act as if using a game as porn is disgusting? Or why do you think the rape fetish is so disgusting when it's not brought into the real world?mike1921 said:Well said, me.
Gave me the impression you'd like rape games banned if it wasn't for the possibility of rape being used as part of a narrative.rape as the goal of a game is disgusting. But should we generally ban rape in games just because of this?
Nah. I'm a first-amendment man through and through. I was just trying to give a example as to how it could be used positively, even though I don't like the idea myself.mike1921 said:...Gave me the impression you'd like rape games banned if it wasn't for the possibility of rape being used as part of a narrative.
.......how is virtual sex real??Cheeze_Pavilion said:Same reason no one thinks twice about teaching Shakespeare's _Julius Caesar_ but they wait before letting you near the Catullus: virtual violence is always just virtual violence, but virtual sexual content is...sometimes REAL sexual content.Darkin20 said:How many games have the user killing lots of human civilians and all it gets is a high age rating, but if a game actually has the user have sexual contact with the opposite sex (either willing or not) and everyone screams bloody murder.
That's why gratuitous violence in a film makes it an action movie, but gratuitous sex in a film makes it a porn.