Really Microsoft, Just Make Yourself A Monopoly And Get Over It That Way You Don't Have To Steel.

[Ginnipe]

Ok, I don't know about you, but Microsoft must have some really deep pockets or their steeling money from Bill Gate's wallet. They have now bought out the MGS franchise doing the same as last year when they bought the FF franchise.

Now I have nothing wrong with any exclusives and acually I havent played any either of these games so none of my thoughts are biased.

But now microsoft is taking away any exclusives from the PS3 just to say they have them. I really hope that Microsoft isn't going to make the MGS or FF franchises exclusives for the Xbox 360 because that would alienate any PS3 gamers that have ever thought of playing those games.

My point is that Microsoft must be secreatly deaparete to have to steel Sony's thunder every E3.

What I think companies should do is make a single console that can work with all PS3 games, all 360 games and all Nintendo games all connected to the same server so that gamers can all play together. Or just make a completly new console that has games worked on by all of the big 3 so that there isn't going to be this ruthless fight to the death to see who has the most exclusives. This would also make it much easier for developers to make their games because what ever make only has to be configured for 1 console, not 2 or three.

(sorry about any grammer and/or spelling mistakes for I wrote this as I was about to go to bed)

UPDATE: if anyone is to have many exclusives it should be Sony becase you can acually play the game on the console befor it getts the RROD and if it does get a system failure then the customer suppor is much better.

UPDATE,UPDATE: The single console concept would not end competition, people are still going to make a competition on which game is best and will try to top them, it would just end the ruthlesness.

 

[Dogstile]

monopolys are horrible

at least this way they have some motivation to IMPROVE

 

[Mychas]

And where's the competition in that?
Without competition, we won't have innovation.
Without innovation, we'd be stuck with 80's graphics.

 

[Kasawd]

Yes, an oligopoly is still rather favourable, these days.

Although, I am not quite sure if I would mind the single console concept too much.

 

[TheBarefootBandit]

monopolys are horrible

at least this way they have some motivation to IMPROVE

exactly

 

[black lincon]

Oh My! Their trying to do better than their competition! I'll call my lawyers immediately!

And by that I mean, so?

 

[k3v1n]

yes, of course, it's a terrorist plot to "steel" franchises, which is being funded by Microsoft...well you know what? I don't give a damn

P.S. good idea though, about the 1 console that plays all games, only problem is that there would be no improvement in graphics or anything, because there would be no need

 

[Calobi]

Weren't they considered a monopoly at one time? How did that go for them? Also, how would one console that plays all the games be any different than Microsoft getting all the games and making them exclusives (aside from the fact that other companies would get the money)?

I am, however, all for a single console. Then I wouldn't have remorse over not getting to play some games that look fun because I'm broke.

 

[scnj]

Why exactly is Microsoft evil? They're just after more money like every other corporation.

 

[timmytom1]

Microsoft are in the "iron and steel industry" now?

Yeah i heard about MS buisness moves first they want to produece genreic games,now they want to prodiece generic stainless steel, DOES THEIR TREACHERY KNOW NO BOUNDS!!!???

 

[Jupsto]

its steal

and if you want there to be only 1 console, why complain about MS taking over everything, sounds like a move in the direction you want.

 

[B0BX]

Microsoft is now based in Pittsburgh.

 

[DeadlyYellow]

I thought they were still being ported to the multiple consoles?

It makes more sense to me. If you own the franchise, why not expand the potential client base as wide as possible to reel in the most money possible?

 

[TikiShades]

I am, however, all for a single console. Then I wouldn't have remorse over not getting to play some games that look fun because I'm broke.

All games would then cost $100 each, and you could not complain.

 

[Calobi]

I am, however, all for a single console. Then I wouldn't have remorse over not getting to play some games that look fun because I'm broke.

All games would then cost $100 each, and you could not complain.

That's not true. I can always complain. It's just that my complaints would be new. My current ones are starting to feel old even to me.

I do get your point, though.

 

[Aristol]

That seems only fair as Sony "stole" the metal gear and final fantasy franchises from Nintendo.

 

[Fronken]

Ok, I don't know about you, but Microsoft must have some really deep pockets or their steeling money from Bill Gate's wallet. They have now bought out the MGS franchise doing the same as last year when they bought the FF franchise.

Now I have nothing wrong with any exclusives and acually I havent played any either of these games so none of my thoughts are biased.

But now microsoft is taking away any exclusives from the PS3 just to say they have them. I really hope that Microsoft isn't going to make the MGS or FF franchises exclusives for the Xbox 360 because that would alienate any PS3 gamers that have ever thought of playing those games.

My point is that Microsoft must be secreatly deaparete to have to steel Sony's thunder every E3.

What I think companies should do is make a single console that can work with all PS3 games, all 360 games and all Nintendo games all connected to the same server so that gamers can all play together. Or just make a completly new console that has games worked on by all of the big 3 so that there isn't going to be this ruthless fight to the death to see who has the most exclusives. This would also make it much easier for developers to make their games because what ever make only has to be configured for 1 console, not 2 or three.

(sorry about any grammer and/or spelling mistakes for I wrote this as I was about to go to bed)

What you are suggesting would be the death of gaming, just so you know that...

And i as an old school gamer would hate to see that happen to my dearest of hobbies.

 

[Donbett1974]

I am, however, all for a single console. Then I wouldn't have remorse over not getting to play some games that look fun because I'm broke.

All games would then cost $100 each, and you could not complain.

That's not true. I can always complain. It's just that my complaints would be new. My current ones are starting to feel old even to me.

I do get you're point, though.

If there's one console than they can charge what they want for games. Competition breed lower prices better games and hardware.