Damn you !!! I was hoping nobody else caught that so i could post it >.<Aristol said:That seems only fair as Sony "stole" the metal gear and final fantasy franchises from Nintendo.
Damn you !!! I was hoping nobody else caught that so i could post it >.<Aristol said:That seems only fair as Sony "stole" the metal gear and final fantasy franchises from Nintendo.
QQ more nubby. You're just upset that you didn't purchase a sexbox 360 (no that's not a typo). Also, do you really think Microsoft bought out MGS and FF just to say they could have them? More like for a profit.Ginnipe said:Ok, I don't know about you, but Microsoft must have some really deep pockets or their steeling money from Bill Gate's wallet. They have now bought out the MGS franchise doing the same as last year when they bought the FF franchise.
Now I have nothing wrong with any exclusives and acually I havent played any either of these games so none of my thoughts are biased.
But now microsoft is taking away any exclusives from the PS3 just to say they have them. I really hope that Microsoft isn't going to make the MGS or FF franchises exclusives for the Xbox 360 because that would alienate any PS3 gamers that have ever thought of playing those games.
My point is that Microsoft must be secreatly deaparete to have to steel Sony's thunder every E3.
What I think companies should do is make a single console that can work with all PS3 games, all 360 games and all Nintendo games all connected to the same server so that gamers can all play together. Or just make a completly new console that has games worked on by all of the big 3 so that there isn't going to be this ruthless fight to the death to see who has the most exclusives. This would also make it much easier for developers to make their games because what ever make only has to be configured for 1 console, not 2 or three.
(sorry about any grammer and/or spelling mistakes for I wrote this as I was about to go to bed)
UPDATE: if anyone is to have many exclusives it should be Sony becase you can acually play the game on the console befor it getts the RROD and if it does get a system failure then the customer suppor is much better.
UPDATE,UPDATE: The single console concept would not end competition, people are still going to make a competition on which game is best and will try to top them, it would just end the ruthlesness.
And we'd get crappy wavy joysticks that are proclaimed revolutionary then have nothing but shovel ware and gimmicky use of the thing at best...............................Mychas said:And where's the competition in that?
Without competition, we won't have innovation.
Without innovation, we'd be stuck with 80's graphics.
So there are no multi-console releases that were good in your opinion?Indigo_Dingo said:Because you're doing so at the direct sacrifice of quality?
Exactly.Mychas said:And where's the competition in that?
Without competition, we won't have innovation.
Without innovation, we'd be stuck with 80's graphics.
Either way Metal Gear and FF are sluts for console companies.Indigo_Dingo said:Fuck no. Metal Gear was never a part of Nintendo's lineup. The NES port was garbage.Aristol said:That seems only fair as Sony "stole" the metal gear and final fantasy franchises from Nintendo.
No Kojima ones, no.[/quote]Indigo_Dingo said:So there are no multi-console releases that were good in your opinion?