Marcus Dubious said:
Shine-osophical said:
THE ONE WEAKNESS OF THE FANATICALLY RELIGIOUS RESIDES BELOW
Logic. Go talk to the crazy ***** and calmly and methodically tear down her entire argument. If she screams and rants then tell her that anger is not condoned by her God (make sure to include the word 'her' as it implies that there are other God(s) of equal importance which goes against her monotheistic approach). Also tell her that whenever she goes to church and worships God, that she is worshipping a false God as by her beliefs, God is beyond our logic and yet the fact that humans (priests) can somehow know the mind of God (main reference being that if you confess God forgives, if you don't you go to hell (as this approach implies that his logic is, in fact, quite simple to understand)).
IN SUMMARY: Use logic against her to destroy her entire argument but do it calmly and rationally. Also make sure to, in a semi-subtle way, imply that her beliefs are stupid (the key is to say it politely and almost as a side comment so that it is harder to respond to because she will have to figure out what was meant first and by that time you are aleady destroying the next part of her argument)
How ecatly would you do that, I would love to argue theology with you.
That is the most irrational ?locic?al argument I have heard when talking about dogmatic belief.
You have no logic apart from calling her stupid, if she doesn?t agree.
Well basically say these things to her .. preferable in this order
Me: "If you wouldn't mind, I would greatly appreciate it if you would stop trying to force you hypocritical and irrational beliefs on me and my school peers."
Her: "*crazy rant about the truthfullness of God*"
Me: "That is all well and fail but seeing as you worship a false idol I don't believe you are any judge of what passes as an acceptable belief system."
Her: "*interrupts with silly stuff about saving souls or whatnot (the key point to this argument is to ignore anything and everything she says and just finish what you have to say as though she never spoke)*"
Me: "I say false idol as your chosen belief system indicates that the logic of
your (emphasis on your)God is beyond the comprehension of human kind and yet in the same beath, the God you go to church to worship is seemingly very ordered and quite easy to understand, such as with the rite of reconciliation where a priest, or in layman's terms, a misguided human being, somehow knows the mind of God and also is able to guarantee that God shall forgive you if you seek forgiveness, which is too predictable by human standards for a being of incomprehensible logic. Furthermore (this is where I would change topic to stop her from forming any argument), you are also attempting to take away
your God's supposed gift to humanity of 'free-will'. If God gave us free will then it isn't your place to try and take that away from us and, if anything, you could be considered, from your own religious view, to be working for the devil as you are working against the working of "God" (use finger quotation marks when saying God).
Her: "I am a devout Christian *bleh*"
Me: On top of all this your entire belief is based around a book which had 100 years to be manipulated by the church, in case you don't get it, during the medieval times, the bible was abused by the Church to manipulate the citizens of the Kingdom for personal gain. (At this point, mention that this is actually glutony and that the Pope himself/selves were guilty of such a sin). It has also been shown that many Gospels were excluded from the Bible and the fact that the Gospels that are in the bible are so similar indicates that those that were in contradiction with what the Church wanted to portray ere removed as it is highly unlikely that all the Gospels were so similar in their description. And, fun fact, the vatican actually voted on Jesus' status of 'divinity'.
(change of focus yet again).
If God truly loves all people equally then why the FUCK (include the swear word to piss her off) would he let children get AIDS and DIE in Africa without ever giving them the chance to escape the horrific poverty in which they are trapped?? Why would he let people believe things different to what he 'apparently' told us, unless he was fine with it??? Why wouldn't he smite those he caused wars and therfore caused the deaths of millions, and he obviously could have seeing as, according to your belief, is omniscient, meaning he would be able to tell if a person would end up doing such a thing???
Anyway, I hope you enjoyed the pre-enactment of my argument with her if I was forced to confront her beliefs.