Rush Limbaugh Defends Video Game Free Speech

Recommended Videos

CaptainKoala

Elite Member
May 23, 2010
1,238
0
41
I don't know why everybody is freaking out about him agreeing with us. He has always been a huge proponent of free speech in all media, and video games are a form of media, so....
 

ChaoticKraus

New member
Jul 26, 2010
598
0
0
Well i definitely don't agree with his policies as they are so right-winged the plane would start to spiral. But he got his constitution right atleast, unlike those tea partiers.
 

Lord Beautiful

New member
Aug 13, 2008
5,940
0
0
lacktheknack said:
Oh, come off it, guys. I bet everything you ever saw of Rush Limbaugh was a biased, no-context youtube clip. I've read one of his books, and he isn't half as insane as everyone thinks he is (although he still is a bit).

I'll take allies where I can find them.
Credge said:
In this thread: About three people who understand current politics and everyone else living under a rock.

Here's a hint to help those with modern US politics (modern being in the last 100 years, but primarily in the last 20 years):

1. Democrat has never meant 'for rights'. Examples: FCC. Prohibition. Arguable: Health care bill.

2. Republican has never meant 'for rights'. Examples: Patriot act.

3. Modern Democrats are uber-liberal. There are a plethora of in-context quotes and books (FROM THEM) that espouse them for being communist sympathizers.

4. Modern Republicans are uber-liberal-lite. There are a plethora of in-context quotes and books (FROM THEM) that espouse them for being communist sympathizers-lite. There's a reason the tea party exists and if you think it's anything other than the Republicans no longer holding the values that they held 20 years ago... you're what Lenin would call a 'useful idiot'.

For those of you who are "YAY COMMUNISM", that's real cool. All those video games you enjoy and love? That's pure capitalism.

Rush Limbaugh is pro-capitalism and pro-constitution. This being a shock to anybody shows both a lack of understanding of the stances that Rush Limbaugh holds but also a lack of understanding of modern politics.
I love the both of you so much it hurts. Until this thread, I was under the impression that the mere mention of Rush would result in nothing more than the oozing of hatred-infused bile from the other users of this site. I'm so very glad I'm wrong. I'm not exactly a tremendous fan, but it infuriates me every time he's painted as a white supremacist bigot Sith.
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
How long until Fox threatens to fire him if he doesn't retract the statement?

Cocamaster said:
Dom Kebbell said:
accept it is a republican bill brought by the state of California. so no, not the current white house administration. twit.
It's a law passed by a Republican Governor (that's more left-of-center than his party) written by a Democrat Senator.

If anything, it's a by-partisan law.
Just goes to show that you can be a complete idiot no matter what part of the political spectrum you fall under.
 

nash_clovis

New member
Jun 5, 2009
48
0
0
Sure, he's an utterly repulsive smoking, drinking, pill-popping loudmouth, but I guess I could agree with him just this once.

This once. Just this once.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
HankMan said:
lacktheknack said:
HankMan said:
archvile93 said:
What did ou expect? Liberals are the ones that like to have the government tell you how to live your life, not republicans.
Yeah that whole CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO BAN GAY MARRIAGE and that IF YOU ARE NOT WITH US YOU ARE WITH THE TERRORISTS bit were soooooooooooooooooo part of the liberal agenda.
The more shameless Liberals wanted everyone to believe they actually said this, yes.
So you're saying George Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and Fox News are actually liberal?
And JUST SO WE'RE CLEAR: I KNOW Cheney doesn't support the amendment thing.
Find me anything that says (WITH CONTEXT) anything about "non-conservatives are terrorists", and I'll concede. Until then, I'm sure you're using hyperbole.
 

kikon9

New member
Aug 11, 2010
935
0
0
I disagree with some of his views, but in this regard, me and him are on the same side.
 

punkrocker27

New member
Mar 24, 2009
418
0
0
Woodsey said:
I'll never understand why a political group who wants the government to be as uninvolved with the public's lives as possible constantly demands the government to outlaw and restrict things.
Hate to break it to ya but liberals are just as guilty of that. Just sayin...
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Xzi said:
archvile93 said:
What did ou expect? Liberals are the ones that like to have the government tell you how to live your life, not republicans.
I lol'd. I suppose the Patriot Act was enacted to give us MORE freedom, then?
Because the Patriot Act banned various unhealthy substances, added curfews, disallowed communications between different groups, and - wait.

Not related.
 

VirtualInsanity91

New member
Mar 12, 2010
19
0
0
Ha. Being an objectivist I like Limbaugh and Beck, but what I dont like is them trying to shove religion down my throat. I think its funny how you guys see Us right wingers as nut jobs. Bent on stopping anything we dont agree with. That we should make people more "decent"
I believe man can do what ever he wants as long as he doesnt physicaly harm another, say what ever he feels, express him self in any form.Right wingers like us, we dont want less speech and freedom-we want more of it. I want the nancy pelosi's of the world to stop trying to force us by law to be politically correct. Righ wingers like Limbaugh and me we want every to be free to do as they feel.
 

Cocamaster

New member
Apr 1, 2009
102
0
0
Xzi said:
archvile93 said:
What did ou expect? Liberals are the ones that like to have the government tell you how to live your life, not republicans.
I lol'd. I suppose the Patriot Act was enacted to give us MORE freedom, then? Clearly tapping everyone's phone was just an innocent prank.
"The Act was passed by wide margins in both houses of Congress and was supported by members of both the Republican and Democratic parties."

"In July 2005, the U.S. Senate passed a reauthorization bill with substantial changes to several sections of the act, while the House reauthorization bill kept most of the act's original language. The two bills were then reconciled in a conference committee that was criticized by Senators from both the Republican and Democratic parties for ignoring civil liberty concerns."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Act
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,658
0
0
Cocamaster said:
Blind Sight said:
What I don't get is all those American conservatives (Limbaugh included) who seem to think that the constitution says that if you're not an American citizen you don't have any rights within America (thus giving them justification for treating foreign terrorist suspects like shit, etc.). Bullshit, the constitution says PEOPLE, not CITIZENS. Jesus people, at least read the damn constitution before you start to 'defend' it, I'm Canadian and I know more about it then you do.
It reads "We the People of the United States", in an age where "citizenship" was applied to individual states, whose entire citizenry was collectivelly reffered to "the United States People".

Meaning that, in fact, "People" means "Citizens" in the U.S. Costitution.

I'm nether a U.S. American nor Canadian, but I know more about their Constitution than you do, apparently. Besides that, Canada's Immigration laws are strictier than in the U.S. You should know that.
Unfortunately you are incorrect about the original content. The Founding Fathers wished for America to be an example to the rest of the world, to show that their society was one of liberty and freedom (all this was, of course, in theory). The American Constitution served as a document of a new kind of political thought grounded in the logic of liberal thinkers like John Locke. Locke's concept of 'natural rights', that every person has a core set of inalienable rights as set forth by God was a huge part of the American political movement during the Revolution, and continued after when they were making the Constitution. The Constitution says people and means it, 'we the people' is used, but citizenship wasn't defined in the Constitution until the Fourteenth Amendment I believe. Yet the document states people, as can be seen in this youtube video by a member of the American Civil Liberties Union (who, I think we can safely say, has more knowledge on the subject them both of us combined):

(Skip to 1:15 for the part of the Constitution that defines citizens and recognizes the natural rights of 'people')


Sir John the Net Knight said:
Blind Sight said:
What I don't get is all those American conservatives (Limbaugh included) who seem to think that the constitution says that if you're not an American citizen you don't have any rights within America (thus giving them justification for treating foreign terrorist suspects like shit, etc.). Bullshit, the constitution says PEOPLE, not CITIZENS. Jesus people, at least read the damn constitution before you start to 'defend' it, I'm Canadian and I know more about it then you do.
Non-citizens in America have more rights than they do in any other country in the world. If you don't believe me, get arrested in a country where you're not a citizen.
Indeed, and I didn't say that wasn't the case, what I said is that there is a series of conservatives in the United States who, through ignorance, feel that the United States Constitution doesn't recognize the rights of any non-American person. That youtube video I posted above has a good example of Sarah Palin, and Limbaugh himself said this on Abu Ghraib:

"This is no different than what happens at the Skull and Bones initiation ... And we're going to ruin people's lives over it and we're going to hamper our military effort, and then we are going to really hammer them because they had a good time. You know, these people are being fired at every day [referring to the U.S. Military service members]. I'm talking about people having a good time, these people, you ever heard of emotional release?"

Basically, this people, specifically, don't recognize the rights of foreign nationals, even though the Constitution says that PEOPLE in general have a right to a fair public trial and all the legal rights that protect U.S. citizens. It's just stupid politics attempting to deal with a current problem, on a whole the United States is fairly good with non-citizens.
 

VirtualInsanity91

New member
Mar 12, 2010
19
0
0
Oh and even though im a right wing kinda guy, the patriot act was a travesty.
Politicians need to stop doing things the constitution tells them they cant do just because theyre in power