loremazd said:snip
Stop. Feeding. The. Troll.Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:snip
Hey. Just because you like PC doesn't make it better.Edzor said:Ok, repeat after me:loremazd said:I don't agree with you, especially with your use of idiotic terms like "console 'tards" grow the hell up and get rid of this moronic "us vs them" mentality, because it's annoying as all fuck.Edzor said:Um, have you even played ME 1?THEAFRONINJA said:Gameswise, probably Mass Effect 2. it was deeper, had better combat and was just all around more polished. Movies? Erm, Empire Strikes Back.
ME 2 was dumbed down to shit (for the console 'tards to be able to play it) compared to the first one, how the hell was it "deeper"???
Ready?
Ok...
"Just because someone's correct opinion annoys me, doesn't make it any less valid."
Do that about a hundred million times, until your little console gamer head understands that it is TRUE.
And I don't give a fuck what anyone says, ME 1 was THE best fucking game I have ever played, while ME 2 just felt like a shitty, shallow Gears of War clone, only with awesome cinematics and dialog.
ME 2 was to ME 1 what GTA IV was to GTA San Andreas, merely a husk of what the previus game in the series was, in terms of gameplay diversity, content and FUN, a DOWNGRADE, and it should be THE OTHER FUCKING WAY AROUND.
You don't fucking SIMPLIFY a sequel, removing all the things that made the first game awesome, just so that console morons can play it, you ADD SHIT TO IT!
Whoever thinks otherwise is not worthy of the title of "gamer".
Shit man, I agree with you, both that ME1 was better and that console games are much easier(not dumbed down, there's a difference), and even I think you're being an asshole.Edzor said:Ok, repeat after me:loremazd said:I don't agree with you, especially with your use of idiotic terms like "console 'tards" grow the hell up and get rid of this moronic "us vs them" mentality, because it's annoying as all fuck.Edzor said:Um, have you even played ME 1?THEAFRONINJA said:Gameswise, probably Mass Effect 2. it was deeper, had better combat and was just all around more polished. Movies? Erm, Empire Strikes Back.
ME 2 was dumbed down to shit (for the console 'tards to be able to play it) compared to the first one, how the hell was it "deeper"???
Ready?
Ok...
"Just because someone's correct opinion annoys me, doesn't make it any less valid."
Do that about a hundred million times, until your little console gamer head understands that it is TRUE.
And I don't give a fuck what anyone says, ME 1 was THE best fucking game I have ever played, while ME 2 just felt like a shitty, shallow Gears of War clone, only with awesome cinematics and dialog.
ME 2 was to ME 1 what GTA IV was to GTA San Andreas, merely a husk of what the previus game in the series was, in terms of gameplay diversity, content and FUN, a DOWNGRADE, and it should be THE OTHER FUCKING WAY AROUND.
You don't fucking SIMPLIFY a sequel, removing all the things that made the first game awesome, just so that console morons can play it, you ADD SHIT TO IT!
Whoever thinks otherwise is not worthy of the title of "gamer".
that's your opinion which is cool, i personally thought it was more exciting but thats just me...Critical92 said:Fear 2 was not better than the 1st :/Blemontea said:Im just going to list the games in my room that are sequels that are better than the original.
silent hill 2, Yakuza 2, Dark Cloud 2, Gears of war 2, Fable 2, left 4 dead 2, fear 2, saints row 2, and DAHOTF ive played the ones before and the sequels certainly make the game better.
WAIT! we can do movies to! in that case Iron Man 2 which is now one of my favorite movies
That's a pretty interesting way to look at it, and I think you're right.Daaaah Whoosh said:Halo 3: ODST had the greatest firefights of the series because there wasn't a BR or Halo 1 pistol that could kill everything. You actually had to vary your arsenal in order to survive.
My buddy and I would play that game for 6 hours straight twice a week togetherDaaaah Whoosh said:Halo 3: ODST had the greatest firefights of the series because there wasn't a BR or Halo 1 pistol that could kill everything. You actually had to vary your arsenal in order to survive.
Actually, you could consider the set to be a sequel to The Hobbit. String, or nothing.sievr said:Man, I hate to be that guy, but you people are forcing me to be that guy. Lord of the Rings is one book, split in to three sections only for the sake of easier binding. There are no sequels. :uts on his ring and vanishes::