@War Penguin: You'd be willing to give it a try next round if your running it?
@Classic SK: I'm curious since I'm new to this shizzle, but if you have no roles other than the killer, how is it any different to just randomly guessing?
@VonKlaw: As I am susceptible to skepticism [small](say that three times fast)[/small], I'm willing to try things out.
And it's sort of like that, but this time we use this whole thread to communicate with each other to guess together who we think the killer might be. Granted, it's one of those situations where we've gotta learn not to take things personally, though. <_<
But things like this are what makes me kind of want to try Serial Killer: Classic. Just some old fashioned stuff. No spies, no medics, just the killer and the wits of everyone else.
@CA That was my waiting music. So it has a point. A veeeeery small point. A tiny point. But I hardly think it fair to be told off when people were talking about laser spiky glasses, sniping butt cracks and other... odd... things. Let's just enjoy the murders, shall we?
@Malyc: Yeah...today was the big group proofreading session for the paper on our semester project. Since I ended up writing a majority of it, I've spent most of the day defending stylistic decisions and content choices. :/
So that's why I'm fairly exhausted. How about you?
@Rimmy: PM is what most people use but any way of contacting me privately will work.
@Wildcard: You know, despite being a joke, it ain't a half bad idea.
I like the concept of the decisive roles though.
I'll be honest, I feel more useful as a spy than a medic.
@Link: Ah, I hate it when people try to correct something I've spent a lot of time on.
Even if they're usually right >_>
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.