Actually it seemed to me that the majority of his vitriol was pointed right at the cuntbag fanbois who accuse them of taking payoffs to give good reviews and that they had to begrudgingly admit that Killzone 2 was so great. Granted he was aiming it at all fanboys but it was definetely the Killzone 2 fanbase that got the majority of his wrath, and for good reason. After all, they directly questioned his integrity.Anton P. Nym said:For your sake, I hope you hadn't watched the video before posting that.hagaya said:Xbox, Halo, etc. Fanboys. The people that would be pissed about that kind of thing.Yog Sothoth said:haven't watched the video, but...
the game got a perfect score and the fanbois still freaked out...? i'm confused...
Sessler took to task the anti-fans for their bleatings, yes, but he also fired plenty of ammo at the fanboys for whom "5 out of 5" wasn't good enough. There's plenty of idiocy to slop around in the fan community, don't let any one group try to hog it all.
-- Steve
I wasn't going to initially but, did you want me to call you a sucker or something?AceDiamond said:$10 for what took me 3-4 hours to complete is a good deal and I don't feel any sort of regret for getting it. Keep in mind that it used to be one might have to spend $50 on an entire game that was that long.GonzoGamer said:Um.
I saw that thing and it looked to me like he was tearing into delusional PS3 AND 360 fanboys. Actually I thought he was being just a bit more harsh to the 360 fanboys except for the ps3fanboy who apparently insulted his integrity. He sunk to that guys level real quick.
I was more perturbed by his previous soapbox where he encouraged everyone to buy DLC: that's just irresponsible. It's easy for him to recommend, he never has to pay for it.
$10-$20 for what's usually a few more missions isn't a good deal on any system.
How has someone missed this?Jennacide said:When it takes stuff from CoD4's perks and exp system, you could say it's not a huge deal. When you take the class system of Team Fortress, the only real class based FPS to date, and water them down and rip off most of the classes, yes. It is.Jumplion said:So now taking a successful game's mutliplayer is plagiarism? Especially a multiplayer as successful as TF2?
Reading has been a problem lately since I went blind. Anyway; Touche, my good man. Basically, Killzone, that is, the original, was a generic apocalypse involving alien invaders plot but very well executed. It was good enough that they made a second and that is the glory of a PS3 game you see this forum being blown up about.DeusFps said:I was asking you to explain seeing as I know bugger all about the game. All i've seen is the footage in the background of that video. But i guess reading is a little difficult for you.hagaya said:Dun Dun DUUNN!! My point exactly. They judge it though they haven't played it. I've played it once and I can say its a phenomonal new experience. Not worth getting my own PS3, but great nonetheless. If you don't compare one game to another, you will learn to like much much more. Oh, and how was it "cut down?"DeusFps said:Can somebody please explain to me why killzone's mp is so good? Looking at that video its just a cut down version of cod4s mp. Which was hardly a good mp experience in the frist place.
Yes there is. I am a fan to Halo a fanboy to Fatal Frame, Silent Hill, and Resident Evil as I own all Silent Hill games, Bought the second Fatal Frame twice just so I could have the box and book (the first I bought was used and didn't have ether) and I am a RE Fan cause I know the series love it and know a lot of facts on it. I didn't want to call myself a fanboy on that cause it was my belief at the time that I didn't know the little facts that a fanboy would then I got in this trivia thread and it became about re between me and this other person and now I am an RE fanboy. But I also happen to be a realist by nature.orannis62 said:You are not a fanboy. You are a fan. There is a difference. I agree on Darksector, by the way.Kevin7557 said:I am a fanboy but I am also a realist. I don't know how that happened, some kind of mutation, I think toxic waste was involved but anyway, just because I am a fanboy of a series doesn't mean the game gets a free ride. I am a RE, Silent Hill, and Part Killzone fanboy. But the way I look at it is that the series must earn my respect and love. If they make crap then I will call them out on crap. (IE Silent Hill Homecoming best and worst silent hill game) I look at it as a love of the series and knowledge of it not blind following.
Sessler is a sell out. He said to get Two Human for christmas and to get Dark Sectors for the B******s in your life. I love Darksector cause it has everything people whine about games having. It has Great Graphics, Gameplay, Unique Gameplay mechanic, Story, Gore, and more gore, ext and it properly rewarded you for your achievements when it came to bosses. Two Human was not a game I would recommend for Christmas. In my opinion if they would have held the game back taken feedback it and made it better it would have been a great game. If not a contendent for game of the year. Now releasing it as was and then saying people didn't like it cause it was too advanced and beyond alot of our comprehension is not the way to go. And yes the guy in charge of making the game did infact insult the gaming public.
Anyway, haven't seen Sessler's Soapbox in a while, thanks for reminding me. Totally agree with Sessler (except on the "Killzone 2 is great part" but only because I haven't played it yet, not saying it's bad).
Yes I do know that it was in developement for over a decade which makes it so funny.Eipok Kruden said:Yo do realize that Too Human was in development for almost a decade, right? And just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's a bad game, same goes for Sessler liking it. It's a niche game, some people love it, others don't. It's unique and it IS very deep, but there are also plenty of people who hate it for what it does. Sessler isn't a sellout or an idiot because he recommended it, it just means he personally likes the game. It was his OPINION.Kevin7557 said:Sessler is a sell out. He said to get Two Human for christmas. . .Too (you had "Two") Human was not a game I would recommend for Christmas. In my opinion if they would have held the game back taken feedback it and made it better it would have been a great game. If not a contendent for game of the year. Now releasing as it (you had "as" and "it" switched) was and then saying people didn't like it cause it was too advanced and beyond alot of our comprehension is not the way to go. And yes the guy in charge of making the game did infact insult the gaming public.
You don't like it, but he does. So do many of my friends. I agree with you on every point you made, but that doesn't mean there won't be people out there that will enjoy it. Get over it.Kevin7557 said:Two Human falls into my catagory of games (which is vast) and I didn't like it. I have been playing games since the atari. I am and always will be a hard core gamer.
That is respectful. I am not saying hey you all have to agree with me that the game is bad. There are many games That I love that people say are bad. (Resident Evil Survivor) My point is when you go reconmending it like it is the greatest game and put down a game which gives players everything they want then that is where I have the problem. Especially when he then goes on to bash the better game.Eipok Kruden said:You don't like it, but he does. So do many of my friends. I agree with you on every point you made, but that doesn't mean there won't be people out there that will enjoy it. Get over it.Kevin7557 said:Two Human falls into my catagory of games (which is vast) and I didn't like it. I have been playing games since the atari. I am and always will be a hard core gamer.