that DOA game might be a bad example as it doesnt offer much else, but how about Bayonetta? An actual female lead character that is nothing more than style, so over drawn that she looks deformed. She is not made attractive by being interessting so you would relate to her, she only gets that weird sexy librarian thing going on with her. She is made to be ogled, posing and being sexy, not as a character to relate to, but as an object to attract to in fairly simple way.matthew_lane said:Sure & people get off to pictures of feet too. So what?Jenvas1306 said:you dont think that games 'DOA: extreme beach volleyball', are getting into the realm of 'very creepy' if you look at them and know that folks actually get off to that?
If you personally don't like DOA, then don't purchase it, don't play it: These are rights you have. The right you don't have is to complain that it exists & as such should not exist, because you don't like it. Your right to dislike it, cannot infringe on the rights of someone else to like it: Regardless of what you personally think about the property, or the people who play it.
And there we go to the shaming, looking upon women as objects should be shameful, but not for the reason that it reduces your chances of actually getting laid, the issue is that you look at people as if they were objects and lots of games promote that view.