It does seem rather silly that they don't go the
Bully route, and just allow it to be the player's choice. I don't recall anyone bitching about Jimmy being able to make out with guys.
As for all the flack you got for such a simple question, well, I'd say that is something of an indicator of the strong existence of homophobia in the gaming community, even today. FYI to you all, no one is pushing anything down anyone's throats if the option to play your character as gay or straight is given, and the irrational fear that all games are going to eventually become one giant gay love-in is homophobia, no matter how many times you might say otherwise. More freedom to sculpt characters in whatever image you see fit is a good thing.
PROTIP to those whining about this post: when you say "I'm not X but..." chances are, you are.
EDIT:
The4th1 said:
I've been lurking on this thread for a while now and it seems to me that no one pointed out that being a lesbian and being gay are THE SAME THING. Someone might have, quote if necessary. You treat it like a symbol.
Considering the demographic for most games and also considering how lesbianism is much less stigmatized by men, no, it isn't the same thing.
SECOND EDIT:
Sorry, I keep seeing things in this rather interesting discussion. I'm sorry I was late to the party.
JaredXE said:
Again, it comes down to you must tolerate my particular group or else I find you intolerant.
Tolerating intolerance is not true tolerance. All intolerance and inequality must be unequivocally opposed, or else it will be left to fester and grow.
And it wasn't accurate, because the study showed that the brains of homosexuals are different. The word "malformed" implies that something is defective, thus putting a negative frame on what was otherwise a neutral piece of information.