'Slut' Parade

Recommended Videos

AgentNein

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,476
0
0
GiantRaven said:
You have no idea how sick I am of seeing people wearing tights/leggings with no skirt/shorts/whatever. That shit shouldn't be worn that way, it looks horrific.
I'm not really a fan of that look myself. Not that I think it's indecent or anything, I just find it unattractive. Reminds me of sweatpants for some reason. Ew sweatpants.
 

gamer_parent

New member
Jul 7, 2010
611
0
0
AgentNein said:
gamer_parent said:
Gunner_Guardian said:
gamer_parent said:
Ericb said:
gamer_parent said:
In the end, I think it would be more effective to actually address the fact that we as a society tend to judge a woman's worth based on her sexuality and sexual conduct.
Smaller battles do tend to help the larger war, though.

But that root right there is probably the deepest and hardest one to pull out. You'll notice here and elsewhere that a lot guys implicitly and explictly believe the worth of that crappy judgement.
that is definitely true, and from THAT perspective, I can totally get behind any movement that tries to win through subversion of norms. umm... GO SLUTS?
Again as I said earlier, the easiest solution right now would be to coin another word with a positive connotation. I've heard the term "sexually liberated women" that seems to serve the purpose but I think a shorter word should be coined.
Go Florgy?
Florgy?
I'm just pulling some random combination of letters out of my behind and seeing if it sticks.
 

AgentNein

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,476
0
0
gamer_parent said:
AgentNein said:
gamer_parent said:
Gunner_Guardian said:
gamer_parent said:
Ericb said:
gamer_parent said:
In the end, I think it would be more effective to actually address the fact that we as a society tend to judge a woman's worth based on her sexuality and sexual conduct.
Smaller battles do tend to help the larger war, though.

But that root right there is probably the deepest and hardest one to pull out. You'll notice here and elsewhere that a lot guys implicitly and explictly believe the worth of that crappy judgement.
that is definitely true, and from THAT perspective, I can totally get behind any movement that tries to win through subversion of norms. umm... GO SLUTS?
Again as I said earlier, the easiest solution right now would be to coin another word with a positive connotation. I've heard the term "sexually liberated women" that seems to serve the purpose but I think a shorter word should be coined.
Go Florgy?
Florgy?
I'm just pulling some random combination of letters out of my behind and seeing if it sticks.
Thumbs up. Send it to print.
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
AgentNein said:
Programmed_For_Damage said:
Fagotto said:
That parade seems like it'd be a good place to find a one night stand though ;D
Thank Christ I wasn't the only person thinking this ;-)

Back to the topic, no one "deserves" to be raped. Point blank.
And in a perfect world someone "should" be allowed to wear what they want without fear of repercussions. However they also can't walk around ignorant of the potential danger they may be putting themselves in. If you donned a suit covered in raw meat and walked around the lion enclosure at the zoo, you shouldn't be surprised if you get mauled to death, as opposed to the guy dressed as a grassy knoll. There are predators out there, like it or not, and making yourself stand out as more of a target probably isn't advised. Yeah it sucks that things are like that, but that's reality. Deal with it.
But it's not reality. This same concept gets brought back up damn near every page by someone who thinks there's some sense to it, but it doesn't reflect reality. Reality is that what a woman is wearing doesn't actually effect her chances of being sexually assaulted.
Actually, come to think of it I did read a couple of days ago some survey of convicted rapists and it indicated that most couldn't remember what their victim was wearing. I don't know if this was to do with the passing of time or it really just isn't important. Certainly some rapists use the "clothing" argument to try and justify their behaviour may just be the desperate clutching of straws.

That said I don't think you can dismiss that the way dress plays a large part of people's perception. I myself dress in a suit and tie for my 9-5 work, but when I'm out I dress goth as I have for many years and the difference in the way random people treat me is night and day. I behave exactly the same no matter how I'm dressed, but if for example I'm in my suit people will hold the door for me and be polite. If I'm in my bondage pants, Demonia 16-ups, net long sleeve top under a black skull tank people can't close the door fast enough on me.

So I accept your point that dress may not be deciding factor in whether you're going to get raped or not, but it does affect people's perception of a person and their perception may lead them to believe certain things about that person that could be untrue; for example that they're always "up for it".
 

AgentNein

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,476
0
0
Programmed_For_Damage said:
Oh I totally agree that how one dresses effects perceptions. I know allll about that. I think the problem I've got with how some people view the reasons for sexual assault is that there's this idea that it's an almost understandable (albeit extreme) response to stimuli such as how someone is dressing. And that crosses dangerously close to moralizing rape stories (little red should have been more mindful of what she was wearing and she might not have been bothered by the big bad), when in reality there's nothing really backing that up.
 

PrototypeC

New member
Apr 19, 2009
1,075
0
0
It's not that rapists don't make assumptions that she "wants it" or something like that, and clothing or make-up can be a part of how a target gets chosen.

...but you know what? There's a seriously wrong perception of what it means to be a "slut" if CLOTHING is likely to stand up in court because rapists are seen as inhuman balls of lust rather than a human culprit who knew exactly what they were doing, and their victim gets most of the blame. It's not just clothing, either... "she shouldn't have trusted him", "they were having sex and she changed her mind", "she shouldn't have been alone after dark"... the rapist's lawyer will come up with something, and it usually works.

What's the classic story about rape? Little Red Riding Hood, a story about how to avoid taking advice from strangers that could lead you into a trap (or I guess how to avoid dangerous animals if you take it literally). The antagonist is barely an antagonist at all rather than a natural force of nature. It's a wolf, an animal. That's how people see rapists and that's why they keep getting sent to rehabilitation centers rather than jail for a long, long time. In that story, it was really Little Red Riding Hood's fault because she was too naive, and not something that can happen anytime, anywhere, regardless of what you're wearing or where you go.
 

Justforonething

New member
Dec 15, 2010
14
0
0
Hive Mind said:
Justforonething said:
Hive Mind said:
Justforonething said:
Hive Mind said:
Justforonething said:
Char-Nobyl said:
TB_Infidel said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-13333013



So these women are proud of being sluts, think that there is nothing wrong with acting in that way, and rather then listening to advice on how to avoid rape, they want to protest?

Does anyone else find this type of behavior ridiculous and shows how warped/hedonistic parts of Western society is becoming?
Way to completely miss the point, OP.

They're protesting a Canadian police officer essentially saying that rapes happen because women dress like "sluts." Apparently, males are barely-restrained rape machines with the vision of Tyrannosaurus, except instead of being sensitive to movement, we're sensitive to miniskirts.
No, but rapists ARE.
Men are not. Rapists, who are often men, evidently do not have the same degree of self control as most men. It's like a soldier dressing like a soldier when there are snipers around. If you don't want to get shot, take off the uniform.
Yeeaaahhh. That's not how rape works; a rapist doesn't just see a pretty girl and decide to rape her.

Nice try, though?
No? Prove me otherwise. As I understand rape, it's forceful sex. Rapists tend to be people of a certain character, or possess mental illness in some way. They are triggered, and to many, provocative dress is the trigger. Not always.
Statistics vary, but most agree that somewhere around 50% of rapes are upon children. Of the rapes upon adults, only about 11% are committed by strangers. The remaining 39% are committed by family and friends of the victim. Study after study have shown and all psychologists agree that not only does rape have nothing to do with sex, physical attractiveness has nothing to do with it.
If you source this, I may believe you.
Still don't think women should dress like that though.
"Rape is considered a 'crime of youth,' where fifty to sixty-three percent of reported rapes were of women under age 18, while sixteen to twenty-nine percent were under age 12." (Greenberg, Bruess and Haffner, 572; Lips, 233)

"Seventy-four percent of females under age 14 who have had 'sexual relations' are survivors of rape." (Greenberg, Bruess and Haffner, 572)

"Females ages 16-24 have the highest likelihood of rape - two to three times higher." (Norment, 152; Rathus, Nevid and Fichner-Rathus, 565)

"Teens 16 to 19 were three and one-half times more likely than the general population to be victims of rape, attempted rape or sexual assault." (National Crime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, 1996.)

"According to the Justice Department, one in two rape victims is under age 18; one in six is under age 12." (Child Rape Victims, 1992. U.S. Department of Justice.)

One quarter of rapes in the U.S are committed by a stranger (US Bureau of Justice Statistics)

I don't know why you feel women should not wear the clothes they like because you don't like them and see them as sexual, but that is your opinion.
Well, it's like I don't think men should have long hair. But I'm not going to make it illegal.
 

thegrimfandango

New member
May 26, 2010
126
0
0
I think a lot of people are missing the point of the protest here.
It's not so much 'I can wear a fucking belt for a skirt if I like and don't you dare look at me, nyer nyer nyer', it's more to point out that things like dressing 'provocatively' (whatever your own personal definition of that may be) should NEVER hold up in anyones eyes (especially the legal system's) as an excuse for rape, and the fact that you have a POLICE OFFICER stating agreement with the 'I couldn't help myself your honour, she was asking for it with the way she was dressed' point of view, something is seriously fucking wrong.
Attitudes like this are the reason so few rape cases are even reported in the first place. There's enough shame and trauma involved without feeling like even the law will tell you it's your own fault, and it reeks of disgusting victim-blaming.
Frankly, men should probably be just as offended by the notion that people think they're slobbering beasts unable to hold their desires in check if they see so much as a bared midriff.
 

Trolldor

New member
Jan 20, 2011
1,849
0
0
Oh for fuck's....


A woman is free to dress how she chooses, and at no point should that ever be accepted as a cause for sexual assault or harrassment. Even if it's nothing but a t-shirt with the words 'Insert penis here' and an arrow pointing downwards.



Any contrary opinion is base stupidity without justification. I really wish people would grow the fuck up. Believe it or not, boys, men can think with the head above their neck. I know many of you find that so hard a concept to grasp, the idea that your penis is not in fact your central processor, but eventually you'll learn to understand it.
I do not approve of women who dress in a way that they can not carry off because it's quite repulsive, and if I disapprove of the way a girl it's dressed it's in the same vein I disapprove of the way a guy is dressed - I don't like the fashion. Utilising the cognitive processes formed in our species over billions of years of evolution I've learned that no matter how a woman dresses it never, at any point, will cause a man to rape her.
What will cause a man to rape is sexual repression or fucked up mental attitudes. Rape will still happen irrespective of how women are dressed, and the pathetic inhuman attitudes that blame the victim are nothing short of wilful, base ignorance from freshly squeezed dog shit.

TL;DR

Shut the fuck up about how women are dressed. It's their right. If you can't help but rape a woman, you and you alone are the problem.
 

UFOROMANTIC

New member
Nov 8, 2010
100
0
0
Trolldor said:
Oh for fuck's....


A woman is free to dress how she chooses, and at no point should that ever be accepted as a cause for sexual assault or harrassment. Even if it's nothing but a t-shirt with the words 'Insert penis here' and an arrow pointing downwards.



Any contrary opinion is base stupidity without justification. I really wish people would grow the fuck up. Believe it or not, boys, men can think with the head above their neck. I know many of you find that so hard a concept to grasp, the idea that your penis is not in fact your central processor, but eventually you'll learn to understand it.
I do not approve of women who dress in a way that they can not carry off because it's quite repulsive, and if I disapprove of the way a girl it's dressed it's in the same vein I disapprove of the way a guy is dressed - I don't like the fashion. Utilising the cognitive processes formed in our species over billions of years of evolution I've learned that no matter how a woman dresses it never, at any point, will cause a man to rape her.
What will cause a man to rape is sexual repression or fucked up mental attitudes. Rape will still happen irrespective of how women are dressed, and the pathetic inhuman attitudes that blame the victim are nothing short of wilful, base ignorance from freshly squeezed dog shit.

TL;DR

Shut the fuck up about how women are dressed. It's their right. If you can't help but rape a woman, you and you alone are the problem.
Don't take this the wrong way, but I think I love you.
 

Sicram

New member
Mar 17, 2010
135
0
0
Decent idea bur the execution went a wee bit sideways. Using the word "slut" which holds varying meanings between individuals was quite the miss, in my opinion.

While scantly clad women shouldn't be seen as individuals who want the get laid all the time, they rather should be seen as people with a hunger for attention, that's why they dress like they do, attention. The excuse that a certain dressing style warrants rape is just silly and stupid. As said, unless they are prostitues they just want to be considered eye candy, get attention, not intercourse.
 

Inglip

New member
Feb 17, 2011
92
0
0
omega 616 said:
Hell, there are a select few girls in the world who love being dominated and being slaves. Why risk prison time for something you can do legally?
Uh yeah, there are girls that want sex without being raped too, so your argument kind of falls apart here.
 

Inglip

New member
Feb 17, 2011
92
0
0
JonnWood said:
Metal Brother said:
TB_Infidel said:
Well wouldn't it be nice if we all lived on a big fluffy cloud and held hands singing hymns.........



sometimes the victim puts themselves in such a stupid position that you leave yourself wondering how can anyone be so void of common sense.
Sorry, I can't agree with that. What you're describing is not a simply a lack of idealism. What you're describing is the same position used by Muslim zealots who insist that all women wear clothing that shows no skin other than the eyes (if that) because men cannot control themselves if they see a woman in revealing or provocative dress.

You're also flying in the face of all research around rape and sexual assault. You can choose to believe what you want, of course, as many people do...

P.S. This is like the 10th CAPTCHA in a row where I have been able to read it without reloading a new one. Good job Escapist!
TB is kind of a troll, whether intentionally or not. He's not going to change his mind.
You can't be an unintentional troll.
 

Inglip

New member
Feb 17, 2011
92
0
0
DragonLord Seth said:
Yo dawg, I heard yo liek retards, so I got you some retards to be retarded while you bein' retarded.

And theose chicks are stupid whores.
Yeah, down with those stupid whores that want to raise awareness of rape.

Wait...

Did you even read the article, or are you just this ignorant.
 

binvjoh

New member
Sep 27, 2010
1,464
0
0
Serris said:
binvjoh said:
You completely missed the point. The parade was to support rape victims and tear down the whole "she dressed like a slut, she was asking for it" stance.

"Just because I look hungry doesn't mean I want random people showing sausages down my throat".
but if dressing like a slut increases your chances of getting raped and you don't want to get raped, then it's pretty obvious to not dress like a slut right?

and if i were a homeless person and was very hungry, i wouldn't mind random people giving me food. the metaphor isn't really as applicable.
You've twisted the metaphor. Being very hungry and looking hungry are completely different things. Just like dressing like a slut doesn't mean you want to get raped.
 

Astoria

New member
Oct 25, 2010
1,887
0
0
There's nothing wrong with being proud of being able to pick up easy but being proud of being a slut? That's just pathetic. I don't care if you're male or female, if you're a slut I have no respect for you because you clearly have no respect for yourself.
 

binvjoh

New member
Sep 27, 2010
1,464
0
0
Trolldor said:
Fuck sake indeed. Glad common sense still lives.

It seems putting it delicately just won't cut it this time.

Astoria said:
There's nothing wrong with being proud of being able to pick up easy but being proud of being a slut? That's just pathetic. I don't care if you're male or female, if you're a slut I have no respect for you because you clearly have no respect for yourself.
Read the flippin' article.