AntiAntagonist said:
The term "feminism" has several connotations. However most people confuse it with "feminazi", both the mistaken connotation and the term "feminazi" were created by those who disagree with either liberalism or equality, as their needs may be.
Why do people insist on associating themselves with feminism if, as they claim, they're only interested in equality? The vast majority of feminists I've seen have, one way or another, advocated policies and ideas that are in opposition to equality, or they have simply complained about astoundingly trivial "problems" while ignoring real ones. Feminists will complain to no end about games like Fat Princess or about traffic lights having male and not female characters in them, but they can't be bothered with real problems like, say, the treatment of women in Islamic societies. They also tend to be paranoid nutjobs with wild conspiracy theories about The Patriarchy which is keeping them down. Of course, they aren't the only group who blame all their failures on a shadowy international conspiracy.
I support equality, and that's why I'm not a feminist. Feminism is at best a political ideology that elevates women, or just feminists, above everyone else. At worst feminism seeks to genocide or enslave the male population, and the fact that such talk is tolerated by society shows just how far feminism has advanced (of course, if you ask a feminist she'll tell you that women have it worse than Jews in Nazi Germany). There is no good reason to say you're a feminist if you simply advocate equality. You do not need feminism and you will simply inconvinience yourself by always having to explain that you're not
that kind of feminist. Of course, there's always the possibility that you don't really advocate equality, or you have a warped idea of what constitutes equality. In that case, I suppose, it makes sense to call yourself a feminist.
Alex_P said:
But feminism isn't one unified movement. Anyone who wants to be a "feminist" can just say so and, poof, they will be thought of as a "feminist" -- especially on the Internet. That's why you get utterly sexist bullshit from self-described "feminists" sometimes.
...
Mostly, though, it's simply that people insist on taking any random statement a feminist makes and ascribing it to feminists. This is stupid.
If anyone can be a feminist and define feminism however they see fit, what's to stop me from ascribing statement X from feminist Y to feminists as a whole? Also, if a self-declared feminist can define what feminism is, then surely an opponent of feminism is free to do the same?
Also: "political correctness machine"? Give me a break! There is no machine. Political correctness is a bugbear dreamed up by American conservatives. They were so successful that it's taken on a life of its own and now everyone bows to it. That's how you get crap like "freedom fries" and endless bitching about the New Yorker's satirical Obama cover -- there's no real source to pin it on, we're just all perpetuating the phenomenon because we assume that someone, somewhere is actually enforcing it. (That's how most of society operates, anyway. Panopticon and all that.)
In several European countries you can be fined or imprisoned for saying things that are politically incorrect, even if they're factually true. That's enforcement. America is, I guess, more free, but since everyone and their dog fervently believes in political correctness it will be enforced one way or another.
Jumplion said:
I feel that's completely untrue. I know that if i look up some more history that there will be some women that stand up to the white man. Jean of Arc comes to mind and a few of those African American (I try to stay away from saying "Black") Women protesters back in the 60s of 70s.
You have no problems with the term white, but you won't use the term black? Also, how was Joan of Arc "standing up to the white man?" She was white herself. She was executed for heresy, a charge which was nullified in a posthumous trial only a few decades later.