So Guys, We're going to all die this time again

Recommended Videos

kickyourass

New member
Apr 17, 2010
1,429
0
0
generic gamer said:
I don't think that this'll kill very many people, this kind of thing happens naturally anyway, nature does have ways of restoring balance.

Frankly it's a lot of mess but it's hardly unknown for oil to enter nature, it does lie in undersea deposits after all.
yeah cause millions upon millions of gallons a crude oil covering hundreds of miles of ocean and killing thousands of living creatures is a totally natural occuance.

OT: This probably won't end the ENTIRE world the way the article says it will, but if someone doesn't do something and clean it up SOON, the world might start getting much worse. Since you know we probably won't be able to eat any of the fish, an industry that is responcible for the well being of millions of people, who may become homeless putting even MORE strain on the economy.
 

Nuke_em_05

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2009
828
0
21
BonsaiK said:
Plank of Wood said:
Doooom! [http://www.helium.com/items/1882339-doomsday-how-bp-gulf-disaster-may-have-triggered-a-world-killing-event]

Now if you don't mind, I'm off to live on Sex, Drugs and Rock and Roll for the next six months.
From the same site:

http://www.helium.com/items/1889326-fear-mongering-rife-around-the-gulf
Well, now that we needed someone to clarify that the article was selling a fat load of BS, back to reality. Or welcome back, rather, to those of you who didn't figure that out in the first place.

Bob the zombie said:
Vhite said:
How many times are we going to die next 5 years?
oh about 10 times, if your lucky. hope you saved up your lives so you can respawn after each cataclysm.
I plan on re-rolling as Worgen after the Cataclysm.
 
Jul 11, 2008
543
0
0
I love how people are comparing this to vague religious crap, misinterpretations of a stone calendar or the potential social economic colapse of our society by a global computer failure.
In theory this could easily happen, it's happened before and there are even smaller scale modern day examples ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2001/killerlakes.shtml ).
If this ever does happen unless you have a multibillion £/$ whatever underground bunker with a self sustaining hydroponic oxygen/food farm and enough people to keep civilisation going for a couple of hundred thousand years (not to mention the room) then don't expect any surface dwelling life larger than a few cells to survive anywhere.

Unbreathable/explosive atmosphere
+
continent crushing tsunami
+
no food
=
fucked

Y2K was never EVER touted as an E.L.E.

though to be fair there is probably a simple(ish) solution if there can be a controlled release of the gasses they could probably be contained for use as feul or burnt as they are expelled.
 

halfeclipse

New member
Nov 8, 2008
373
0
0
Abengoshis said:
Woah woah...since when is methane a "poisonous" gas.
Its not really, still very bad to inhale it though. Short version, in high enough concentrations your red blood cells don't have access to enough oxygen and start absorbing the methane instead. If you don't get access to oxygen fairly fast, que oxygen deprivation, unconsciousness and death.
 

SilverUchiha

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,604
0
0
Anyone wanna summarize what that article said for me? I don't feel like reading the whole thing only to determine it's another bullshit doomsday theory.
 

Aiden_the-Joker1

New member
Apr 21, 2010
436
0
0
I have never heard of this before the mass extinction 250 million years ago was caused by a massive super-volcanic eruption and It didn't kill 96% of the world's population, it was more around 70%
 

geldonyetich

New member
Aug 2, 2006
3,715
0
0
So, the theory is that a giant bubble of methane will erupt, poisoning the atmosphere and causing gigantic tsunamis?

What a fun closure to our story that would be. "Humankind got greedy and screwed up while lusting after oil, so the Earth farted and they all died."

Nah. Humankind is adaptive to a level unprecedented versus any other species on Earth. We can be found in the harshest deserts and barren arctic wastes. So this wouldn't wipe out humanity, though it may cause quite a bit of loss of life.

Frankly, a major hit to our population may not be a bad thing. We've massively overpopulated the planet, and our screwed up capitalistic incentives are giving people reason to cause irrevocable damage to the Earth as a life supporting mechanism. That we're backed into the corner by the backlash of our own shortsightedness and forced to reform would better happen sooner than later.

Though it would be a bummer to get killed before I experience my full lifespan, I suppose I need not fret over unemployment or my student loans.
 

Angus565

New member
Mar 21, 2009
633
0
0
"The bottom line: BP?s Deepwater Horizon drilling operation may have triggered an irreversible, cascading geological Apocalypse that will culminate with the first mass extinction of life on Earth in many millions of years..."

*whistles* Man, that's gotta be bad for business.
 

sunburst

Media Snob
Mar 19, 2010
666
0
0
I absolutely love doomsday scenarios. Our fascination with our planet's demise is fascinating. My friends and I have an extinction pool. We each pick one of the many ways we're supposed to die in the near future and put $100 down. When the end inevitably comes, whoever called it right takes the pot. I got my money on a hypernova. I do believe giant methane bubble is still up for grabs. Anyone want to get in on this?
 

Billion Backs

New member
Apr 20, 2010
1,431
0
0
I am Omega said:
*sigh* ANOTHER Doomsday theory. Honestly, what's with all the gloom and doom in the later half of the 2000s? Ever since about 04, hell, even in 00 if you count y2k, it's been nothing but "WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!" And every idea they've had so far turns out to be false.
Except in this case it doesn't seem to be the regular irrational bullshit like 2012 or the similar.

It seems to be backed up with scientific data, at least to some extent. It's not the "Ancient people said we're all gonna die so we totally will", the article both cites the precedents for this kind of bubbles erupting in the past, and various observations from different sources that would normally be considered more or less reliable, which, of course, could be fake (but then again everything you hear and see can be fake, it's only limited by your own paranoia and mistrust).

While I certainly have no knowledge in the areas this theory deals with, it seems like at least a plausible theory. Methane does exist on the bottom of the sea. Methane bubbles are known to fuck shit up. Compare this with your everyday doomsday theory that cites astrology, religion, or other forms of idiocy. I think this one is a clear winner.

Meh, whatever.

Edit:

DUDE. I KNOW WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT, GUYS. BLIZZARD IS STAGING A SPECIAL EVENT FOR THE CATACLYSM WOW EXPANSION. IT'S GONNA BE OUT IN ABOUT 6 MONTHS, COINCIDENCE?!? I THINK NOT!

Remember, if you see a giant fucking dragon made out of Earth and Magma, run the fuck away, it's Deathwing.
 

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
"The subterranean methane is pressurized at 100,000 pounds psi. According to Matt Simmons, an oil industry expert, the methane pressure at the wellhead has now skyrocketed to a terrifying 40,000 pounds psi."

This alone ruins it. 40,000 pounds pounds-per-square-inch. Good one, dumbass.

Or how about "Workers there now wear advanced protection including state-of-the-art, military-issued gas masks."

I didn't realise gasmasks required that much technology... or that military issued was much different than, say, the standard ones at oil rigs where you can easily hit 'sour gas' which would kill everyone without gas masks.

"If the methane bubble?a bubble that could be as big as 20 miles wide?erupts with titanic force from the seabed into the Gulf, every ship, drilling rig and structure within the region of the bubble will immediately sink. All the workers, engineers, Coast Guard personnel and marine biologists participating in the salvage operation will die instantly."

No, actually, the humans will either be crushed or, vastly more likely, drowned. Which is not instant. Many ships not directly over this "bubble" have a decent chance of surviving, but it'll be rough. Like in the Perfect Storm. (massive waves)

"Next, the ocean bottom will collapse, instantaneously displacing up to a trillion cubic feet of water or more and creating a towering supersonic tsunami annihilating everything along the coast and well inland. Like a thermonuclear blast, a high pressure atmospheric wave could precede the tidal wave flattening everything in its path before the water arrives."
Ok sure. That would be a pretty big disaster and reach a good deal inland in some areas. But certainly not capable of killing the world.

"When the roaring tsunami does arrive it will scrub away all that is left."
lol.

"A report from one observer in South Carolina documents oily residue left behind after a recent thunderstorm. And before the news blackout fully descended the EPA released data that benzene levels in New Orleans had rocketed to 3,000 parts per billion."
Well no shit, it's an oil spill. It does, however, suck a LOT.

"Most experts in the know, however, agree that if the world-changing event does occur it will happen suddenly and within the next 6 months.

So, if events go against Mankind and the bubble bursts in the coming months, Gregory Ryskin may become one of the most famous people in the world. Of course, he won't have long to enjoy his new found fame because very shortly after the methane eruption civilization will collapse"

Haahahaha!
 

kickyourass

New member
Apr 17, 2010
1,429
0
0
child of lileth said:
T-Bone24 said:
child of lileth said:
So this gas bubble is going to kill everyone again? And how small was 96% of the population then, compared to the billions of people in the population now? I think if anything does happen, we'll be fine.
I don't believe the theory, but I'm just gonna correct you there. It's not 96% of the human population that it killed, it was 96% of all life on the planet, which includes plants and tiny little insects, all that noise.
Yeah, I worded my first post wrong, and made it sound like just humans. But still, most living things have a way more expanded population this many years later compared to what was around then. I just think it wouldn't be as bad in comparison to that time. (Assuming anything does happen, of course)
Hold on just one minute, 96% of the ENTIRE PLANET dying off, isn't that bad? What the hell sorta thought process brought you to that conclusion? Hell 96% of a single city dying is reason enough to panic let alone 96% of the planet.
 

Dingoman013

New member
Mar 11, 2009
264
0
0
dathwampeer said:
Plank of Wood said:
Julianking93 said:
Looks like a bunch of bullshit.

Just like every other Doomsday theory.
Most bullshit doomsday theorys say that "Yeah, We might die in the next thousand years or something, can I have my geology degree now?". This theory is saying it will happen in the next six months. As far as bullshit doomsday theorys go, that's pretty ballsy.
But they don't lose anything if they're wrong. It's just another media fuck. They do this all the time. The media really enjoys instilling mass panick in the population. It keeps their minds off more pressing issues. Like when are we going to stop killing each other.
OMG you put a k in panic, your grammar is already being affected!!!!! EVERYONE START LOOTING!!!!
 

The_ModeRazor

New member
Jul 29, 2009
2,837
0
0
In the grim darkness of the future, there is only WAR.

See? It doesn't say anything about bubbles of doom, so there are no bubbles of doom.
/thread

Edit!: Also:
"The dwarves dug to greedily and to deep, and awakaned something."
"A creature of Shadow and Fire?"
"Nope, a lot of gas."
 

child of lileth

The Norway Italian
Jun 10, 2009
2,248
0
0
kickyourass said:
Hold on just one minute, 96% of the ENTIRE PLANET dying off, isn't that bad? What the hell sorta thought process brought you to that conclusion? Hell 96% of a single city dying is reason enough to panic let alone 96% of the planet.
96% then, is a small number, compared to that number + how much more population there is of every living thing now. That' what I'm saying. No one says it would take exactly 96% of what there is now if it happens.
 

TheEvilCheese

Cheesey.
Dec 16, 2008
1,151
0
0
*singing*
So long and thanks for all the fish
So sad that it should come to this
We tried to warn you all but oh dear?

You may not share our intellect
Which might explain your disrespect
For all the natural wonders that
grow around you

So long, so long and thanks
for all the fish

The world's about to be destroyed
There's no point getting all annoyed
Lie back and let the planet dissolve

Despite those nets of tuna fleets
We thought that most of you were sweet
Especially tiny tots and your
pregnant women

So long, so long, so long, so long, so long
So long, so long, so long, so long, so long

So long, so long and thanks
for all the fish

(yeah)

So long and thanks for all the fish
So sad that it should come to this
We tried to warn you all but oh dear?

(oh dear)

Despite those nets of tuna fleets
We thought that most of you were sweet
Especially tiny tots and your
pregnant women

So long, so long, so long, so long, so long
So long, so long, so long, so long, so long

So long, so long and thanks
for all the fish