FieryTrainwreck said:
We, as a society, arbitrarily determine the worth of a naked body jiggling around on stage. At a McDonald's, everything is determined by actual costs - as in, how much does it cost to supply the product to the customer. At a strip club, we simply pay out relatively ludicrous amounts of money to women with no real qualifications or skills because we happen to be in power (thanks to excess income) and horny.
One price (crappy cheeseburger) is based on fixed real world costs. The other (titties!) is purely arbitrary. That is the distinction. If prostitution were legal here, you'd probably be defending that as well. Hey, women can choose whether or not they want to sell their bodies, right? The fact that the market will offer them $500 for an hour's work shouldn't impede their ability to make a moral decision, right?
Anyways, I'm obviously someone who believes that unrestricted free market capitalism puts unreasonable pressures on people to compromise their beliefs. That doesn't seem to be a prevalent attitude in this thread. I'm probably just gonna have to take my ball and go home.
"Unrestricted free market capitalism"?
Come on. Don't make me out to be some asshole capitalist with no regard for my fellow man.
Where there is demand, there will be supply. Such is the way of the world.
If a woman is able to feed her family, or even just herself, by stripping(and make more money from that, than flipping burgers from McDonalds), that may seem like a better option to her.
But yes, if prostitution was legalized I would be defending that just as well.
For the record: I take it you are also against male strippers? And male prostitutes, for that matter?
~~
Also, we're talking entertainment value here.
You cannot talk money in specific terms when speaking of service employees.
A bad stripper makes less than a good stripper.
A bad burger-flipper doesn't make less than a good burger-flipper.
You cannot compare an exchange of money for service, with an exchange of money for product.
You can expect the product you buy to have some set standard, and the price will most likely stem from the cost of the product plus some profit margin for the company making it.
When we're talking service, there is no set standard. You could compare a strip-club service to the "service" of an actor in a movie. There is no set standard for an actor, although better actors earn better roles and thus more money. Better strippers earn a bigger crowd, more regulars and therefore more money.
Why are we throwing seven-figures at actors for portraying one single character in one single movie? I don't know. That's life. That's entertainment.
Your argument should also be applied to actors then, and everyone other profession merely exchanging a "service" rather than a product. An auto-mechanic, perhaps. One can complete the education without being an especially good mechanic, and will then earn less money. One can be a super mechanic, and earn more.
Why are we paying outrages amounts of money to professional footballers? We like to watch it. It's fun. It's entertaining.
Why do you pay..., etc., etc. - This is what you should compare it to. There is no set standard for pay, nor performance(although some performance is expected, proportional to the pay), for "services".
This has nothing to do with "unreasonable pressure" on moral beliefs. It has to do with each person individually. If you think every woman feels pressured to do stripping because of society, the American economy(and economic system), then you're the one discriminating women and not me. Women aren't weak-willed like that... If they were, everybody would already be a stripper.
I'm not really sure what you point it, and I'm quite certain I've just moved away from it in my post. What was your point again? Have I addressed it?
As a note: I'm in no way promoting capitalism. I'm an anarcho-socialist at heart, and would love nothing more than the complete downfall of capitalism - that doesn't mean I'm without reason, however, and am able to distinguish.