Sony Slams Wii, 360 For Offering Less Value Than PS3

Recommended Videos

Zer_

Rocket Scientist
Feb 7, 2008
2,682
0
0
I really like Sony's aggressive marketing approach, it really works out for them.

If you haven't realized this yet Sony, Nintendo is kicking your bloody ass because they brought in a buttload of non-gamers into the fold. Nintendo is also working on adding a lot more complexity to future Wii games (and possibly their next console).
 

Pigeon_Grenade

New member
May 29, 2008
1,163
0
0
Nakawa said:
This just strikes me odd that a company this big is resorting to a childhood mentality of "If I can't see it, it can't hurt me". But then again, I'm not a business major so I might just be missing some huge point there
the point is this 'crack is good, lets have more of that then change anything'

and the rest of the board agrees
 

mark_n_b

New member
Mar 24, 2008
729
0
0
The dubious value assessment aside I just don't understand why Sony would make a statement like this.

It's a proven fact that consumers don't respond to aggressive and defensive statements / marketing strategies like this. Telling people they are stupid for considering the competition does not calculate to attracting consumers.

Microsoft learned this lesson with the RROD scandal, and now they replace any Xbox hit with the affliction. If Sony would just back off of the "we are teh awesome" and admit their price point might be a little high, they'd earn so much consumer credibility, I bet they'd be able to close the gap between themselves and the xbox.

I would also like to point out dollar value isn't set solely in the overall price, the fact that you can pick and choose your xbox features and purchase them in manageable small components is a type of value in itself. example: I do not own a projector at this point because bulbs for them cost an excessive amount. the projector my buddy owns operates on standard 100 watt bulbs. The projector bulbs last 10x as long, making them cumulatively cheaper. But my buddy can walk out the door and drop the coin for a pack of 100 watts any time at all, and he can afford to pick up more than one back up in a purchase, giving him more value for his projector.
 

Gormers1

New member
Apr 9, 2008
543
0
0
They are smart enough to compare ps3 with a 360 arcade console where they add a HD later. If they compare an elite or "pro" version of 360, then they don't have that much to say about the price. Also it comes with a headset and both hdmi and component cables. But whatever.
 

BlueMage

New member
Jan 22, 2008
715
0
0
photog212 said:
As long as PS3 and 360 exist the two consoles have to constantly compete against each other for the public's money. This means that the two companies will always try to out do each other by creating better consoles, better hardware, better exclusives, so on and so forth. Competition causes evolution. So who ultimately wins? The consumer. So to all the people who wish downfall upon the system they do not own, please take a course in economics.
You realise of course that Sony have just raped that entire concept re: multimedia formats. Ain't monopolies a beautiful thing?
 

Zer_

Rocket Scientist
Feb 7, 2008
2,682
0
0
BlueMage said:
photog212 said:
As long as PS3 and 360 exist the two consoles have to constantly compete against each other for the public's money. This means that the two companies will always try to out do each other by creating better consoles, better hardware, better exclusives, so on and so forth. Competition causes evolution. So who ultimately wins? The consumer. So to all the people who wish downfall upon the system they do not own, please take a course in economics.
You realise of course that Sony have just raped that entire concept re: multimedia formats. Ain't monopolies a beautiful thing?
I'll be frank. Blu-Ray is not going to overtake DVD anytime soon. Blu-Ray came way too soon. DVDs came along at a time when VHS was a long established format. Many people were ready for a change. Blu-Ray comes along just when DVD was getting settled in as the only format.
 

mattttherman3

New member
Dec 16, 2008
3,105
0
0
Lol poor sony, lower the price and they will come! greedy fuckers, my xbox 360 doesn't clutter my entertainment area! the amount of games i have does
 

MrGFunk

New member
Oct 29, 2008
1,350
0
0
Simriel said:
MrGFunk said:
Malygris said:
Sony Slams Wii, 360 For Offering Less Value Than PS3

I consider this advertising. M$ throws it's weight around in the press constantly. Personally, I'm glad Sony are finally stepping to the plate. People should know the details.

I don't understand why they're bringing the Wii into it. Maybe just to show they're not picking on Microsoft (who of course they're targeting).

jupiterman said:
You know who else made a chart and statements just like this? SNK. For their Neo Geo system comparing it to 'inferior' 16-bit systems. Not long before it tanked.
There is no comparision between the NEO GEO and the PS3.

I have never met or spoken to anyone who owns a NeoGeo (you, maybe my first?) but I know loads of people with a PS3.
AWOOGA AWOOGA! FANBOY ALERT! FANBOY ALERT! REFUSAL TO FACE FACTS! REFUSAL TO FACE FACTS!
I own BOTH of the consoles attacked by sony here, and i love them both, Also im a student, i cant afford an HDTV, or Blu-Ray movies, i can barely afford games for my Wii and 360, so why should i pay extra money for th blu-ray drive? Until recently i was a PC gamer, therefor had no bias either one based on ownership, my 360 being a present. it came in at around 350 dollars (current exchange rate, im a U.K resident) and came with a HD cable, and 3 games! so i was able to take it right outa the box and start playing right away, also im on an ethernet network, and really cant be bothered with the (marginally) reduced speed of a wireless network
Are you referencing yourself, ironically as an entrance?

I can only assume not, so if you are referring to me you have completely overreacted.

You don't even make reference to either of my points. The chart was in the OP. I didn't make it.

Please don't use my post as a springboard for a rant unless it actually has something to do with what i've said.
 

ProfessorLayton

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
7,452
0
41
This chart is using figures from a boiled down version of the 360 and the better version of the PS3. They also didn't point out that the online for the PS3 is a lot less user friendly than live and also the Hard drive and all the things that the PS3 has the the 360 doesn't come with the better version of the 360. It really didn't need to point out the Wii sucks, because that's obvious.
 

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
MrGFunk said:
Simriel said:
MrGFunk said:
Malygris said:
Sony Slams Wii, 360 For Offering Less Value Than PS3

I consider this advertising. M$ throws it's weight around in the press constantly. Personally, I'm glad Sony are finally stepping to the plate. People should know the details.

I don't understand why they're bringing the Wii into it. Maybe just to show they're not picking on Microsoft (who of course they're targeting).

jupiterman said:
You know who else made a chart and statements just like this? SNK. For their Neo Geo system comparing it to 'inferior' 16-bit systems. Not long before it tanked.
There is no comparision between the NEO GEO and the PS3.

I have never met or spoken to anyone who owns a NeoGeo (you, maybe my first?) but I know loads of people with a PS3.
AWOOGA AWOOGA! FANBOY ALERT! FANBOY ALERT! REFUSAL TO FACE FACTS! REFUSAL TO FACE FACTS!
I own BOTH of the consoles attacked by sony here, and i love them both, Also im a student, i cant afford an HDTV, or Blu-Ray movies, i can barely afford games for my Wii and 360, so why should i pay extra money for th blu-ray drive? Until recently i was a PC gamer, therefor had no bias either one based on ownership, my 360 being a present. it came in at around 350 dollars (current exchange rate, im a U.K resident) and came with a HD cable, and 3 games! so i was able to take it right outa the box and start playing right away, also im on an ethernet network, and really cant be bothered with the (marginally) reduced speed of a wireless network
Are you referencing yourself, ironically as an entrance?

I can only assume not, so if you are referring to me you have completely overreacted.

You don't even make reference to either of my points. The chart was in the OP. I didn't make it.

Please don't use my post as a springboard for a rant unless it actually has something to do with what i've said.
I think i quoted the wrong person... Because when i wrote it, the fanboy alert was relevant, whereas your post is not a fanboy rant... and it had something to do with someone mentioning the prices... anyway, sorry, wront person quoted
 

SomeBritishDude

New member
Nov 1, 2007
5,081
0
0
Well, this is pretty snotty and pointless.

If PS3 continue to stick to there guns theres a good chance they'll murg or disappear from the next console generation altogether.
 

Vlane

New member
Sep 14, 2008
1,996
0
0
mattttherman3 said:
Lol poor sony, lower the price and they will come! greedy fuckers, my xbox 360 doesn't clutter my entertainment area! the amount of games i have does
And this people, is a fanboy.
 

Anton P. Nym

New member
Sep 18, 2007
2,611
0
0
Onmi said:
Okay wise ass how much do you think it costs to make a PS3? the fact they sell the console at less that what it takes to make it means they aren't greedy you whiny poor bastard.

You wanna talk greedy? Charging for your Online service is greedy.

Charging 20% more of what the game should actually cost is greedy.
You should've quit while you were ahead; last time I checked, PS3 games cost the same as Xbox360 games, and more than Wii games.

I will say that I personally don't agree that MS is overcharging for Live, but I know that others honestly do so I can't truly refute it. And yes, Sony is taking a bath on every console sold so I can't accuse them of greed for overcharging on hardware.

I can (and have) grumped about them using the PS3 as a trojan horse for Blu-Ray, which drove up the unit cost significantly and is contributing to said per-console bath-taking despite it's debatable superiority as a game storage medium. (Yes, you can pack more content on it, requiring less medium for the same content... but it loads content more slowly than DVD, necessitating in many cases a lengthy installation process before play that's shorter (and optional) on the 360 and not present at all in the Wii.) If you want to call Sony greedy, it's in the wider scope of (pyrrhically?) winning the Format War of '08 and not in the hardware price of the console itself.

-- Steve
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
KiiWii said:
I've been watching this epic battle for so long now, and sony continue to earn my contempt. Its getting to the point where its not even funny anymore, its just sad.

Dear Sony,
Change your playstation ways, or lay down and die.
I agree.