Spartan Vs Astartes

Recommended Videos

Trolldor

New member
Jan 20, 2011
1,849
0
0
Loop Stricken said:
Addicted Muffin said:
Despite the astartes healing abilities, they are more bulky and arent as agile as a spartan.
No. They really are.

I wonder if youtube has a clip from the film to prove it...
You really have to read to get the full scope of it.
No matter how fast chief may be, a space marine is faster. And stronger. And more resilient. And more intelligent. And... yeah.
 

Icaruss

New member
Mar 24, 2011
415
0
0
bad rider said:
The Chiefs primary advantage is that he's neurally linked with a sophisticated artificial intelligence and his reflexes.

I would imagine in a cluttered environment the spartan would have the edge given that he would be able to obtain better firing positions more frequently, make effective use of motion sensors and be able to "out think" an Astartes due to a complicated AI.

Whereas in an open field with limited cover, Master Chief would be overpowered through sheer brute force.


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VERY IMPORTANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I THINK PEOPLE AREN'T CONSIDERING THE MOTION SENSOR .
In the Books most have something simliar along with vitals sign displays, Spiffy targenting software and a bunch of other gear. (their Helmets are loaded with tech)
 

ZeroMachine

New member
Oct 11, 2008
4,397
0
0
Fidelias said:
Okay, this is actually a hard question.

I think that if it were The Master Chief against one of them, the Chief would definitely win.

He has better training. (He was trained since 12 years old to be one of the most powerful killing machines in the universe.)

He has much better mobility and reflexes.

He has a lot of experience (He demolished entire armies single-handedly.)

He doesn't rely on his armor. He was trained to fight without it.

So really, against any kind of grunt without a face, he'd win, no question.

Now a Spartan vs a Space Marine is a toss-up. Dexterity and reflexes vs strength and armor. I'd probably still go with the spartans.
Sorry, gotta correct you on a few points here...

John was trained since he was 6, not 12.

He would rely on his armor in this fight... and he prefers fighting with his armor in genaral. He feels strange without it.

He never demolished armies single handedly. He rarely, if ever, worked alone until after the fall of Reach and the Halo incident. And even then, he had some (if pitiful) backup.

Now, with all that said, as much as I love Halo and John 117, sounds like these Space Marines would win. But that's only because it sounds like the creators decided to go overboard with them to make sure they sound damn near unbeatable. It's why I don't like Warhammer 40k. Too many things are just retardedly powerful. I find it boring.

EDIT:

I just watched some of the video that was posted, and I partially take back what I said... in the books, it shows what the Spartan II's can really do, and they'd tear those guys to shreds. They're just a fucking wall. They're like Hunters. And I saw them running... a Spartan II could run circles around them.

They have the advantage of weaponry, but so do a shit load of the Covenant. And we won every ground op against the Covenant that a Spartan was in up until Reach. Oh, and if they have a problem against the Space Marine armor?



Also known as the Spartan Laser. Also known as the "Fuck You" gun. It'd tear straight through that armor.

Spartans win in a one on one. But I will admit that the Space Marines would outnumber them. There were only 33 known Spartan II's to survive the augmentation process. Way more Spartan III's, but they weren't as strong. Just easier to make.

EDIT 2:

And to any of you saying the SM's are smarter than a Spartan, read the Halo books. If that movie was any indication, you're dead wrong.
 

alrekr

New member
Mar 11, 2010
551
0
0
MrJKapowey said:
wiredk said:
it could be some dipshit scout who is now completely screwed...

I could go on, they are reasonably even if you peek into Chief's fluff as well as the SMs
Go Chief!

[small]Sorry for any terrible grammar or punctuation, I'm on a relatives laptop which is quite slow.[/small]
Scouts aren't space marines they are space marines in training (except in the space wolves chpapter)

Also HAVE YOU SEEN THE SPACE MARINE FLUFF?

"reasonably even" is a crazy statement; look at some of the previous posts in regards to 40k fluff the writers are just going crazy these days.

Betcher's Gland
Phase 17: Consists of two identical glands, implanted either into the lower lip, alongside the salivary glands or into the hard palette. The gland works in a similar way to the poison gland of venomous reptiles by synthesizing and storing deadly poison, which the Marines themselves are immune to due to the gland's presence. This allows a Space Marine to spit a blinding contact poison. The poison is also corrosive and can even burn away strong metals given sufficient time.

Space Marines spit acid!

http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Creation_of_a_Space_Marine#Betcher.27s_Gland
 

bad rider

The prodigal son of a goat boy
Dec 23, 2007
2,252
0
0
Icaruss said:
bad rider said:
The Chiefs primary advantage is that he's neurally linked with a sophisticated artificial intelligence and his reflexes.

I would imagine in a cluttered environment the spartan would have the edge given that he would be able to obtain better firing positions more frequently, make effective use of motion sensors and be able to "out think" an Astartes due to a complicated AI.

Whereas in an open field with limited cover, Master Chief would be overpowered through sheer brute force.


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!VERY IMPORTANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I THINK PEOPLE AREN'T CONSIDERING THE MOTION SENSOR .
In the Books most have something simliar along with vitals sign displays, Spiffy targenting software and a bunch of other gear. (their Helmets are loaded with tech)
Oh cool, I'm just working off of wiki pages so.... (runs away)
 

Tanfastic

New member
Aug 5, 2009
419
0
0
ITT

Warhammer fanbois vs. Halo fanbois

I think it'd be a fair, close, fight but in the end the chief would win due to Cortana helping him out (revealing weakness in armor and junk.)
 

PettingZOOPONY

New member
Dec 2, 2007
423
0
0
This is starting to look like a PC vs console thread. One side using established canon for their argument the other just saying nah ours would win because we said so.
 

GruntOwner

New member
Feb 22, 2009
599
0
0
Fidelias said:
Okay, this is actually a hard question.

I think that if it were The Master Chief against one of them, the Chief would definitely win.

He has better training. (He was trained since 12 years old to be one of the most powerful killing machines in the universe.)

An astartes is chosen for training before puberty, and only the toughest survive that. For the Blood Angels, in order to even be considered you have to cross their equitorial land mass on foot, in your infant years

He has much better mobility and reflexes.

Now you're just making stuff up, even in the books the SPARTANs were never Astartes level

He has a lot of experience (He demolished entire armies single-handedly.)

Before being a genuine battle brother, they spend at least a decade in the 10th scout company, unless they're Black Templar. Those guys are even more badass, though

He doesn't rely on his armor. He was trained to fight without it.

An astartes doesn't need his armour either. Scouts wear carapace, and un armoured an astartes is a giant 2 genetic steps removed from the most powerful human being ever, so powerful that even as a handful of cells in a life support machine, he can exert his will to project a psychic lighthouse visible in hell AND fend off any daemons tempted to it, who actually have a door straight to his throne room thanks to his attempt to access the Webway

So really, against any kind of grunt without a face, he'd win, no question.

That's a literary factor, not a combat factor

Now a Spartan vs a Space Marine is a toss-up. Dexterity and reflexes vs strength and armor. I'd probably still go with the spartans.
 

PinochetIsMyBro

New member
Aug 21, 2010
224
0
0
Space Marine, obviously. They're likely to be a head or two taller(two in the case of Spartan 3s) and over twice as wide. Much better reflexes and armor as well.

Not to mention have a bit of genetic material from the only post human existence running through their genetic makeup.

This is before you take in this like their several centuries of combat experience or more, etc etc etc. It's rather one sided.
 

Udyrfrykte

New member
Jun 16, 2008
161
0
0
Two entirely different universes. In terms of proportional badass-ness there could be a discussion.
But "facts vs facts"? Astartes hands down, don't be silly.
 

Addendum_Forthcoming

Queen of the Edit
Feb 4, 2009
3,647
0
0
Bah ... Space Marines ....

The universe they occupy is so much harder, grisly, uncaring and overtly cruel ... I reckon a Cadian shocktroop would give Master chief a run for his money, much less a space marine.
 

Shirokurou

New member
Mar 8, 2010
1,039
0
0
The best spartan is Leonidas

Let's do Dante vs Bayonetta instead, cause I'm not too familiar with either Halo or 40K
 

Zoraste

New member
Apr 23, 2011
11
0
0
O maestre said:
Sojoez said:
Is there actually ANYTHING outside the WH40K universe that could beat an Astartes? As in, from an other game?
ask a star wars fan, he will give you an encyclopaedia of all the ways star wars beats everything..... despite the second bigger badder death star with no exposed ..exhaust port was beaten by ewoks.
No, even as a Star Wars fan, I have to say that pretty much anything in Star Wars would get utterly annihilated by WH40k stuff. Sure, a Star Destroyer may be a cubic mile of death incarnate, but, well, they're ONLY a cubic mile of death incarnate. That's like, a couple of frigates in 40k. The bigger ships are Super Star Destroyer sized, easily, if not bigger, and annihilate planets with shocking ease and alarming regularity. And pretty much any army in 40k would be able to take any Star Wars army in a ground war EMBARASSINGLY easily, including the Jedi, since they can't deflect bullets like blaster shots. And also pretty much every form of weapon in 40k right down to the basic lasgun can blast a significant hole in something.

As for the fight between the Chief and an Astartes? Well, as both a Halo and 40k fan as well, I would definitely have to say that while the Chief might be able to take out a Scout, or even a small squad of them if he was very, VERY careful and lucky, a full Space Marine, or god forbid, a Terminator, would turn him into red goo in a metal tube quicker than you can say "Explosive Rounds". The Chief would have to get insanely lucky and catch a Space Marine unarmed, and he would still have to use a plasma grenade, which while it would kill a normal Space Marine due to the cloud of superheated plasma, probably wouldn't kill a Terminator, or even do anything but annoy it. Sorry, Halo fanboys, but the 40k Space Marines are in a league of their own, and the Chief just isn't up to par. The Astartes would take one look at the Flood and the Covenant, crack their knuckles, and exterminate their entire species inside of a month (factoring in travel time).
 

deakin_j

New member
Mar 14, 2011
49
0
0
I'm pretty sure a Space Marine will win, for several reasons. as well as the whole "7-foot-tall, genetically engineered killing machine", his sidearm's a freaking mini-rocket launcher. urban warfare? not a problem, as the SM could just go straight through the wall. technology's also pretty one-sided, seeing as space marines: 41st millenia, whereas halo is only set 500 years into the future. the chief just wouldn't stand a chance.
 

EMFCRACKSHOT

Not quite Cthulhu
May 25, 2009
2,973
0
0
SckizoBoy said:
Master Chief vs Space Marine Brother Sergeant = no brainer, Master Chief
Chief gets hit by a bolt round. Shield absorbs initial impact and shorts out. concussive force turns chiefs insides into a squishy red paste. Second round explodes said paste into surrounding area
Master Chief vs Space Marine (with a Storm Shield) = both collapse with exhaustion after about a fortnight
Marine beats chief to death with storm shield and eats his flesh to gain his knowledge.
Master Chief vs Space Marine Brother Captain = difficult, still Master Chief, methinks, but he'll be basically dead after the fight
Space marine captain spits acid into chiefs face and smooshes him with a power fist
Master Chief vs Space Marine Chaplain = as with Captain, except the other way around
same as above except he uses his crozius instead of a power fist.
Master Chief vs Space Marine Chapter Master = they'd probably both kill each other in a blink
space marine chapter master flicks chief to death with his pinkie whilst smiting an eldar wraithlord and turns his skull into a beer mug.
Master Chief vs any Grey Knight = Grey Knight wins
agreed.
The normal SM's have awesome armour that allows them the same dexterity, but Mjolnir is arguably better in that regard, though its protective properties aren't much compared to Tactical Dreadnought Armour. However, MC will kick the crap out of most normal marines but not officers due to the joy that is the Iron Halo/Storm Shield. Enter Grey Knights (who are still technically Astartes) and the picture changes 'cos they is got psyker abilities to ramp up their badassness to idiotic levels.
Everything a marine can do whilst not wearing his armour he can do better whilst wearing it. He is more agile, faster, and stronger than the chief by an absurd amount.
No spartan portable weapon in the halo universe aside from maybe the spartan laser could scratch a suit of ordinary power armour.
A boltgun fires a small krak missile, designed to explode inside a target. even if the chiefs shield took the force of the initial impact, the concussive force from the explosion would destroy the chiefs insides. His armour might as well b paper when compard to a boltgun. hell, i doubt even a lasgun would have trouble with it. At best its comparable to carapace armour
chief fires weapons at space marine, space marine "stop that it tickles" and then he crushes the chiefs head in his hand xD
Master Chief in WH40K lore (probable):

WS BS S T W I A Ld Sv
6 6 4 3 3 6 4 10 2+ (4+ Inv)
More realistic master chief stats

WS BS S T W I A Ld Sv
4 4 4 3 2 4 2 9 4+ (6+ inv)
Plus power weapon, hotshot lasgun/pistol, Fearless and a couple of other special rules that probably benefit more his squad than him. Against normal Captains/Chapter Masters, that'd be a right handful, but little to GK BC whose default weapons are just too nasty.
your stats are more ridiculous than calgars xD and utterly unrealistic.
WS BS S T W I A Ld Sv
6 6 5 4 3 5 3 10 2+ (3+ Inv) (in CC after activating Hammerhand)

Plus force weapon, psybolt storm bolter, Aegis plus loads of other shit.

Feel free to argue at your leisure.
Argument made :p
 

Treeinthewoods

New member
May 14, 2010
1,228
0
0
My money is on Squirrel Girl since we're just putting random characters from different universes to war with each other. Either that or Superman, but only if Squirrel Girl doesn't defeat Superman first of course.

Between the two OP put up, Master Chief. He's more awesome, he would win on that alone.