I am not going to rejoice in the death of another creature but I hope the dad doesn't get charged, he was protecting his family and has removed a detrimental element from the world.
And....
I would have to respectfully disagree and say while I do think killing is a low action and a sign that the individual has failed or not considered all other methods, sometimes removing select individuals who are detrimental to those around them is the most logical action.StormShaun said:Why don't people remember that killing makes more killing and suffering?
But I still think killing is the worst path to go down. I mean sure...break a couple of legs but don't kill him. It just makes life worse.
And....
Paladin Anderson is right. Just like people who say 'the devil made me do it' blaming society is essentially just blaming a scape goat that can't answer back. I think modern society is in a messed up state and it may have screwed him over at some point but at the end of the day the guy, like all of use, still had free will.Paladin Anderson said:I know this man probably wasn't the soulless monster we'd like to think he is. But this "Society is to blame" stuff has never sat well with me. He did it. HE did it. Not him and his neighbors. It wasn't a group project. They didn't put out ads in the news paper asking the community to come lend a hand. This society is partially to blame stuff has always seemed extremely coddling to me as if this person is a victim as well. He had freedom of choice.Daystar Clarion said:People are very quick to abhor those who have committed such crimes without a thought as to why, beyond the standard hyperbolic 'soulless monster' shtick.BathorysGraveland said:Indeed. I said in the other thread that it was a sad case all around, for all three individuals involved. It certainly isn't as black and white as most people would like to believe. Either out of sheer ignorance or simple denial.Daystar Clarion said:On some level, society had failed this man, he didn't get the help he needed to overcome his problem.
It's up to us, the thinkers, to question why.
He could
a: Seek help
b: NOT follow that perverse urge to touch the girl
c: Violate her in ways that will haunt her for the rest of her life.
He choose C. And no one is to blame for that but himself. Our society isn't perfect but this man is NOT a victim. If he had done it out in the open and people ignored the girl's screaming, then yeah I'd join you blaming society.